Skip to comments.Blackmailing Obama
Posted on 01/10/2010 3:48:06 PM PST by opentalk
Of all the most dangerous aspects of the constitutionally ineligible Obama usurping the office of the Presidency, the prospect of blackmail is one of the most frightening. When a person owes his job to a cover-up and election fraud, he will do anything to keep it. And remember, if it wasnt for the fraud, he would not have been on the ballot, and we would not be facing this prospect of treason from within. In my view, Obama has now crossed that line definitively....
Under this scenario, the United States is dragged into one conflict after another, or the resources of the country are spent elsewhere because a President is afraid to be caught in a life-long lie, and is thus beholden to another agenda. In my opinion, a great part of this pResident is motivated by his information-holding blackmailers to do as they say or be exposed. The pathological narcissist is the perfect target for blackmail.
Protecting and defending the Constitution and American lives should be a first priority for any American President. But bounded by the favors he owes his financial and political backers, protecting America takes a back seat to the payback of those who put him in office.
The Usurpers Vulnerabilities to Blackmail
The following presents a partial list of Obamas vulnerabilities to blackmail that we know of:
-IneligibilityNot a Natural Born Citizen
The obvious Achilles heel is Obamas Constitutional ineligibility for the office. No matter where you land on this subject, Obama simply has NOT proven he is a Natural Born Citizen, and no authority has ruled him to be so.
Can you imagine how much money has been spent to silence, intimidate, or eliminate anyone or anything with the knowledge of who he is? And this is is probably on an international scale.
The cover up of Obamas entire identityindeed, the probable manufacture of his identitysurely involves bribery, extortion, and the use of U.S. government agencies, non-profit organizations like Moveon.org, ACORN, and others to intimidate and silence any potential investigation or revelation of information. All backed by huge money.
The role of Nancy Pelosi in fraudulently covering for Obamas lack of Article II eligibility, and campaign cash whose origin remains unexamined are also worrisome aspects of Obamas ineligibility, or how he evaded detection and with whose help.
Um...Dr. Kate, DUH!
blackmail? Soros already owns the guy.
The full article needs to be read, with comments. Barry is susceptible to blackmail in several categories in addition to his constitutional ineligibility. The blackmailers are very likely running the government now. It’s not just a possibility.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Humor me, please. I know nothing about Dr. Kate. What’s the scoop?
The potential for foreign blackmail is especially huge. Sure seemed unusual to me how fast zerO decided to betray the Czech Republic and Poland on those missile shields. The State Dept gave them no warning whatsoever.
His clear objective is the destruction of the U.S. Constitution, so we need to look for those who want that to happen to look for the sources of information on Obama and potential blackmail. The following is a preliminary list of behavior that could be perceived as a payoff for not revealing anything about who he is
1. INTERPOL E.O. This fits with his overall effort to destroy the rights in the Constitution, and focused on Article 1 Section 9 of the US Constitution. But was he or his cronies guaranteed immunity from INTERPOL investigations to allow this to happen?
2. Stimulus Bills, Health Care, Other Spending. Does Obama owe Nancy Pelosi any legislation she wants, or the insurance companies a profit, or foreign donors, and the bankers a payback for getting him elected? Are republicans part of this agreement to keep quiet, and why? Looks like Ben Nelson and Mary Landreau, and probably many other more, took the money like cowards.
3. Communists appointed as czars and agency heads. To keep quiet about Obamas communist background are security clearance rules waived by the WH to allow them to invade the WH?
4. Terrorism inside the United States. What is the reluctance to call it what it is, radical Islamic terrorism? Political correctness? Whose agenda desires the outbreak of war within the United States and killing of American citizens? Why the casual response?
5. Stalling on Afghanistan. Who is Obama buying time for? Which group of terrorists? Is he initiating war between terrorist groups, with America now a battle field, by his actions. And if so, for whom?
6. Foreign, National Security, and Economic Policy. All of Obamas initiatives are following classic lines of totalitarianism, socialism, and communism, using uniquely American tools such as the Cloward-Piven strategy and Alinsky tactics, and backed by huge amounts of money backing useful idiots. Who is interested in bankrupting America, removing the Constitution, enslaving its people, and destroying its sovereignty?
There is so much danger in the usurper continuing in office. In conclusion, Id like to offer this statement from George Washington on January 14, 1776:
The refection upon my situation and that of this army produces many an uneasy hour when all around me are wrapped in sleep. Few people know the predicament we are in.
Blackmail is certainly a possibility. But it could cut either way. For example, Israel could blackmail him into being less pro-arab. (I’m assuming the Mossad is up to the task of finding his real birth certificate)
I don’t see what he’s doing now as being the result of blackmail. In his books - esp. “Dream From My Father” he comes across as a smug, leftwing, America - hating internationalist. That’s pretty much how he’s governing.
If he suddenly starts acting against type, that would be evidence that blackmail is being done, IMO.
Determining where the BC is located isn’t the problem, really. It’s getting someone in the position to do so more motivated to reveal it than to conceal it.
You have known me long enough to know I am no 0bama apologist. My issue with this birth certificate issue is that 1) people keeping changing their criteria on 0bama citizenship and 2) there was an opportunity to raise these issues prior to Nov of 2008 and when the votes were counted in the joint session.
No scoop and I guess it’s not a bad idea to state the obvious — that Obama’s hidden, unknown past (school grades and records, law firm records, health records, how he traveled to Pakistan at a time when U.S. citizens couldn’t get visas, nevermind the birth certificate) leaves him vulnerable to blackmail — as she does, to those who have never considered it.
Got it. I thought the Duh! was in reference to Dr. Kate.
To state or not to state, that is the question. I have a flair for the obvious myself. In this case, it’s far better to state and restate than not to state.
Still no National Security Strategy from Obama. I was required by law in July, 2009.
“Determining where the BC is located isnt the problem, really. Its getting someone in the position to do so more motivated to reveal it than to conceal it.”
They got Eichmann. And the Munich plotters. Killed lot of Egyptian and Iranian nuke scientists. I think they could “turn” somone with access to State Dept. Passport records, or someone at the Hawaii dept. of public records.
The blackmail angle is interesting. The fact that he isn’t acting against type, that “the dog is not barking,” so to speak, suggests to me that there isn’t as much “there” there as we might wish.
Who knows what machinations and deals
are being made behind the scenes to protect
the truth about this ‘wunderkin’ and the
accompanying costs and risk to us and our
Look at my byline. I’ve been saying this since the election.
Obama part of group locked up at Russian airport // U.S. delegation stripped of passports as guards demand to inspect plane
Chicago Sun-Times (IL) - Monday, August 29, 2005
Author: Lynn Sweet, Sun-Times Washington Bureau chi
WASHINGTON Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) were not allowed to leave a Russian airport Sunday and were locked in a room briefly.
The incident prevented their departure for about three hours, but Obama told the Sun-Times it ended up not being a very big deal.
The senators had their passports seized by local officials at an airport in Perm. Obama said the officials demanded, unsuccessfully, to inspect the DC-9 military aircraft being used by the congressional delegation for the trip.
Although he was on a first-time diplomatic mission, Obama has traveled extensively, spending part of his youth in Indonesia and visiting Kenya, where his father was born. He noted that as a back- packing college student he had a lot less leverage than this time.
Obama , a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, and Lugar, its chairman, left Wednesday for a trip to inspect sites where nuclear and biological weapons are slated to be destroyed in Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan. On Sunday, the U.S. group was scheduled to fly from Perm to Kiev, Ukraine. But border guards wanted proof that the groups aircraft which Obama said looked like a mini-Air Force One was really an official U.S. government plane, which would be exempt from an inspection.
Robert Gibbs, Obama s spokesman traveling with him, said in an e-mail that the border guards took our passports and demanded to inspect our aircraft, which we refused. We were moved to a room to wait.
At one point they were demanding to inspect virtually everything, including the gifts their representatives at the missile facility had given us. The border guard said they were acting on the authority of the FSB, the Russian intelligence agency.
Precisely. And the key reason to have all those ‘records’ made public. After all, at least one guy, Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, died for something having to do with the passport fruad.
How does it work.... when dozens of different intel agencies can blackmail you, when dozens of political competitors have the goods on you — what happens when there are hundreds of people who can blackmail you??
“Still no National Security Strategy from Obama. I was required by law in July, 2009.”
JJ, You need a graphic to go with that. Like one of those clocks or debt clocks.
-Lack of Experience and Decision Making Skill-
"There is nothing to write about here. Hence his handlers had to create a whole different image where these things didnt matterhe was sold on the idea of hope, as a vessel secretly filled with contempt for America. Obamas lack of experience also means that someone else is making the decisions and doing all the strategic thinking. And this is the way it has to be or he wont be there."
He does appear to just be the spokes person. The 2000 page bills and the agenda seem to be coming from elsewhere.
There! Fixed that.
O’Bammy is already Owned...
Beck has documented who is writing all that crap. It’s the Left basically. It’s not like they just starting thinking about what they wanted to achieve yesterday. This has been a long time coming. And Obama is a willing participant. He’s one of them.
And Amen, I've had these same thoughts for a long time.
So did I and ready to comeback with the twenty’ish year old indoctrinated opinionated reporters.
Hmm. If multiple parties have blackmail-able dirt on Obama, then their conflicting demands should cancel each other out.
So then the question is, who has dirt on Biden?
And the Saudis!!!
Actually, we don’t need a B.C. to know that he still is NOT a NBC!!!
You mean acting conservative and patriotic?
That would mean that loyal conservative Americans were blackmailing him.
You’re either funnin’ or something else....
All that crap was pre-written fro sure.
The issues where raised both prior to the DNC convention, and numerous times prior to the EC votes & "certification" in the form of lawsuits. Problem is, it got zero play in the media. Nobody was going to deny the first black (who's really more white and arabic) POTUS...especially when his "popularity" was sky high thanks to the cheer leading state run media, hollywood and uneducated liberal 18-30 y.o.'s
You mean acting conservative and patriotic?
That would mean that loyal conservative Americans were blackmailing him.”
What I’m saying is that it would be hard to tell if Obama’s being blackmailed by America’s enemies, because, based on what we know about him - Rev. Wright, “Dreams,” Frank Marshall Davis, etc - he mostly agrees with them.
The poster who suggested that the left could blackmail him to move more boldly on his agenda than he wants to had a point, however.
But yes, if Obama suddenly moves right on some issues - becomes pro-isreal, or pro coal mining, for example - that, to me, would suggest blackmail more strongly then anything he’s doing now. The left doesn’t need to blackmail Obama. He’s already on their side.
Your premise is wrong. His backers are leftists and Muslims. If he acted against the wishes of leftists and muslims, they would undoubtedly threaten to expose him. Any “right” agencies that have dirt on him would be smaller in number or power - money talks. He’s gotta dance with those that brung him.
It wasn’t “right” money that put him where he is.
The left may not “need” to blackmail him, but it is a very good way to shackle him and make sure he not only stays on track but sprints even faster to bring the US to destruction.
Just because he is already in agreement doesn’t mean he is not acting according to instructions of other entities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.