Posted on 01/28/2010 2:37:32 PM PST by rxsid
An Open Letter to Glenn Beck
From: Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Written: 28 Jan 2010
"Glenn, you say you have studied the founders and framers of our U.S. Constitution to try to learn more about the original intent and meanings of the words therein.
I Believe The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election and The Cover Up is Still Going Strong and Has Created Tthe Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis!
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/i-believe-fix-was-in-for-2008-election.html
Glenn, when are you going to read the preeminent legal treatise of the time of the Revolutionary War against Great Britain that was used by the founders to write the Declaration of Independence and the framers to craft our U.S. Constitution. Benjamin Franklin referred to it as being in heavy use and demand by the delegates at the Continental Congress in 1775 when four copies were sent to him by Dumas who published a newly edited edition in 1775. It was written in French the diplomatic language of the time of which Franklin and many others who founded our nation were fluent in as well as English.
The term, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness", is a direct quote from this book. And there are many more quotes from it in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. And this book is even mentioned by name in Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
This book was the legal reference book describing a new form of government for governing a Constitutional Republic with a written Constitution that George Washington had on his desk and was observed reading from in his first day in office in New York and it was the legal book John Jay had on his desk as the 1st Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. John Jay's letter to George Washington is the reason the legal term of art from that legal book is in Article II of the U.S. Constitution as to the eligibility requirements to be President.
The name of the book is, "The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law", by Vattel. I recommend you read it. If you don't have time to read it all, read at least Volume 1. And if you don't have time to read that, the read Vol.1, Chapter 19, Section 212, on the natural law definitions of "Citizenship" and the separate meaning and definition of the legal term of art "natural born Citizen".
The question for constitutional standards regarding Obama is not whether he is a Citizen of the U.S., but whether he is a "natural born Citizen" of the U.S. to Constitutional standards as envisioned by the founders and framers of the Constitution and reiterated in four U.S. Supreme Court decisions over the next 100 years of this nation until the progressive movement started to blur those two terms in the eyes and minds of the American people so their political party can put forward and elect anyone to the office of President and Commander in Chief (CINC) of our military. The President and CINC per the founders intent must have sole allegiance at birth to only the USA with no citizenship at birth from his parents in any other nation. That is a "natural born Citizen", citizenship at birth in only the USA. He must be born in the USA to two Citizens of the USA to achieve natural born Citizenship and sole allegiance at birth. Obama was born with dual-citizenship. He was not eligible per the founders intent. But the Progressive movement has convinced People otherwise. And you are helping them with their cover up.
Read Vattel's, "The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law", Vol. 1, Chapter 19, Section 212. This is natural law given to nature from God. Pray on it. Then speak the truth from the heart. Speak truth to power. You have the ability to save the Constitution and the Republic. Please speak up on the true meaning of "natural born Citizen" and educate the People on the difference between born Citizen, naturalized Citizen, and "natural born Citizen" http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same
I am a Son of the American Revolution. I served my country in the military for 33 years on active duty and reserves. I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to defend a President or a man.
Please read this book and then speak out about it on your shows.
Sincerely,
Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)
Pennsylvania
http://www.protectourliberty.org"
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-glenn-beck.html
The question also is - did Hannity ever smear “birthers” like O’Reilly or BORe’s new pal Beck?
I do not think so.
A few months back - almost on cue and on the same day they all came out making jokes about “brithers.” Hewitt, Ingraham, Coulter, Medved, Boortz and a few other lightweights. My guess is they were probably all warned to get on board or else.
At the same time - Coulter starts doing CNN shows a lot including Larry King.
The more established and bigger stars did not say a word.
Well, I have mainly stayed out of this....but... I think the time has come to actively pursue this issue.
Obama is not a legal natural born American citizen. He is a foreigner and not eligible to be a POTUS.
This piece of crap needs to be stopped ASAP.
bfl
I concur. So far this issue has garnered no traction and at this time I believe it is best to put our efforts elsewhere. The people are waking up slowly but surely.
Did Glenn fall of the wagon and start drinking again or did his porn addiction (he admitted to both on the radio) flare up again?
I really liked Glenn but his friendship with O’Reilly was the other final straw. Glenn is just an Obama,Soros NWO, Bilderberg,Davos stooge.
Exactly! Hannity has mentioned the issue, but never (to my knowledge) ridiculed those that seek the answers like BOR and Beck have.
I listened to Michael Savage while traveling and he spoke on Obama’s eligibility for at least two hours. He said he could speak out because he owes no one. He said all the others have to do what they are told. And if they don’t, they lose their jobs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLPmjZEN1Eo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SlRw9hyWmc
bfl
Once people realize that when Barry is exposed, it will mean everything he's done becomes very questionable from a legal/Constitutional perspective, perhaps they will get it.
His eligibility issue is much bigger than his proposed health care. Can a usurper sign anything into law, or sign agreements with other country's? Will Nanzi, Biden and others fall with him, as they helped to perpetuate this fraud against the American people...even declaring him eligible (in writing on DNC papers)?
The signers of the Declaration of Independence were labeled "radicals". I'm glad they didn't sit on their hands and "stay away from it".
EVERY day 0bama sits in the Oval Office, he does this Country irreparable harm. If he can be removed, even one day sooner by proving that he is not qualified and is a usurper, then it is best for the Country.
Here is the Phil Berg interview. Savage’s comments I heard were a couple of nights later and I can’t find that show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al-OfGK36gc
It hasn't gone away, either, like so many had hoped.
A recent field poll done in liberal California (of all places) found that at least 1/3 of the respondent's were either not sure or don't believe Barry was born in HI. That is significant. Furthermore, that is simply the question of birth location.
It would be interesting to see the results of a poll question like this:
Do you believe that someone born with foreign citizenship, can and should be considered a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.?
I'd wager FAR more people than 1/3 would say No to such a poll question.
Whenever someone writes me or tells me that his birth cert. has been all over the internet, I say, “Fine, then just tell me who the birth doctor was and what hopsital he was born at.” Nobody knows, period.
What do they all have in common? The FCC. The FCC works for his Highness. Threats are not below the FCC. Think of them like the IRS or ATF.
Yeah, I had heard ole’ Doc Savage interview Phil Berg twice last year. He too has raised the issue a few times, but the timing for him appeared to be bad as he was fighting to get his name off the Britain “Terrorist” list.
“Question - Do you believe that someone who was born with foreign citizenship is, and should be considered a natural born citizen?”
Simply put - No
I haven’t trashed the issue. Perhaps this is a scenario in which the Overton Window could be used as an advantage.
I can’t imagine what he’s thinking or what knowledge he had prior to broaching the subject. But one quick question, what do you mean he must have been warned? Like he got some inside info? If so, what kind of info could cause him to take on the subject?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.