Posted on 02/11/2010 9:45:43 AM PST by AKReportz
Six days ago, the big news out of Texas was that Tea Party activist and gubernatorial candidate Debra Medina came within the margin of error with Kay Bailey Hutchison, who barely clung to second place against incumbent Rick Perry. Today, Glenn Beck suffers heartbreak when Medina more or less cops to being a 9/11 Truther as well as a “constitutional conservative” candidate. “I think some very good questions raised have been raised in that regard,” Medina replies when Beck asks whether she believes that the American government was in any way involved in bringing down the World Trade Center towers on 9/11. Medina says she won’t take a position on a question where “good questions have been raised and haven’t been answered,” even though they have been answered for years. Beck and the others in his studio can’t quite believe their ears:
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
They’re going nutz on her FB page:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Debra-Medina/95669721909?v=wall&ref=search
She disqualified herself.
We need our conservative officials to have courage.
We also need them to be of sound mental health.
The 9/11 truthers who supported her are coming out of the woodwork on her FB page by providing links to conspiracy theories, etc.
Page has been deleted.
Oh, my.
She didn’t say she was at all....she said she would not fire someone on her staff who was...that is a big difference.
Hmmmmmm. Still works for me. :-/
Um, not quite.
She said, “There are a lot of quesitons unanswered. There are a lot of good arguments made.”
She’s a truther.
So there you go.
We don't know what she thinks...she seems to believe there are facts on the wild side of this issue that demand investigation. For me...knowing the nutcases were all arabian was all I need to know.
Well, looks like it’s Rick Perry then. Not great, but better than KBH and better than a truther nutball.
You can’t spin away her lack of forceful denial of the charges made by some in Texas who informed Glenn that she espoused the idea. Her first answer, that “some interesting questions have been raised” was bad enough, but the disingenuous “I’ve never heard that before” to his explanation that Texans are warning she is a truther is all I need to know that she is dishonest, not worthy of holding an office of Public Trust.
I say it is the later without a doubt.
And if she is someone who thinks Americans did this horror to fellow Americans, then if she cannot simply SAY SO she is not worthy of anyone's vote. That kind of obfuscation is a liberal way of doing things. Dishonest.
If she thinks there are outstanding questions about it all, then she should say so, like she did.
Rick is Sarah’s pick! :^)
Nice try, but this one's not going to get spun. She's toast.
“She’s dead, Jim.”
- JP
Ya, Rick P. is OK by me, but then again, I’m a Mizz-u-rah man...
Glenn Beck’s ignorance has begun to show.
I call him “Rick with a P.”
Good arguments made.............
Dear God, what is in her head beside a big empty space.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.