Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
Apples and Orange's and you know it.

I can easily say. NO, I do not believe that the US Government was anyway involved in the 911 attack. However, it is our Constitutional right to QUESTION our Government in everything and watch them very closely.

To this, I would add that the 911 non partisan commission found NOTHING to suggest the Government was any way involved.

39 posted on 02/15/2010 10:09:32 AM PST by BornToBeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: BornToBeAmerican

Isn’t that what she said in her announcements later? Along with the clarification that she believes people have a right to question their government?

The 9-11 Commission was a sad, sad joke. The gal who should have been answering questions - Jamie Gorelick - was sitting on the panel! And the result was that the panel REFUSED to seriously look at why actionable intelligence from Able Danger was thrown away.

Because Judicial Watch was finally able to win their FOIA suit we know why the information on the Brooklyn-based AQ cell headed by Mohammad Atta was destroyed, even though the people being referred to other intelligence groups were not citizens and therefore didn’t qualify for “Gorelick wall” treatment.

We know the information was destroyed because Secretary of DEfense wanted to discredit Able Danger’s work - since they also pointed out suspicious connections between William Perry’s own company, a Chinese front company, and contacts at Sanford University. It turns out that William Perry ABSOLUTELY knew he was selling forbidden military satellite technology to the Chinese government via a front company owned by the Chinese commander’s wife - because a contact at Sanford University expressly said he was matching the two companies for the purpose of the illegal sale.

Congress’ Cox Report had brought attention to the leaks by the Clinton Administration to Chinese front companies and Congress was pushing hard for a formal investigation by the DOJ. Janet Reno said no, and that was that.

William Perry got rid of the information about Mohammad Atta because he was covering his own a$$.

Now - should I call that “government involvement in 9-11”? Should I call it government involvement when I know that the 9-11 Commission had at least one thug on it who was covering up the illegal activity of our Secretary of Defense?

I believe that Islamic terrorists carried out 9-11. I also believe that the US government is full of crooks and that people in the government have been playing fast and loose with US security in order to do CYA for the crooks in government.

We see the same thing with Nidal Hassan, CAIR, the NPP voter intimidation thugs, etc ad nauseum.

How would I respond to a question about the government’s involvement in 9-11? I’m not sure. And I absolutely believe that the event was planned and carried out by Islamic terrorists. Just like I believe the Christmas Day bomber was an Islamic terrorist but still have big questions about who in our government knew what when and why they did what they did in not seeing it prevented.

I think we do everybody - and the truth - a disservice if we have a litmus test and throw out as crazy anybody who doesn’t totally swallow our corrupt government’s official line. At this point I think a person is crazy if they DO authomatically accept everything we’re fed.

The IPCC e-mails are another example that by laughing off “conspiracy theorists” we enable real conspiracies which could bankrupt this nation if unchecked.


60 posted on 02/15/2010 10:27:46 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson