Skip to comments.MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Taitz v Obama (QW - DC district court)
Posted on 02/19/2010 3:45:38 PM PST by rxsid
"Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to recuse the US attorney's office from representing the defendant.Complete MOTION, here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/27132803/MOTION-for-Preliminary-Injunction
Plaintiff is seeking the Preliminary injunction-Injunctive relief to obtain the vital records of the defendant prior to the February 26 deadline for document and response submission of the response by the Plaintiff to the CA Bar.
Memorandum of point and authorities
The only relevant authority in this case, is the unanimous decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States and provided by the opinion written by two justices: John Paul Stevens and opinion by Steven Breyer. "Sitting president of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him from acts done before office and not related to the office."
Preliminary injunctive relief sought
Plantiff is seeking an order by this honorable court directing the defendant to release by February 26,2010 his original birth certificate, which was allegedy obtained based on the defendant's birth in Kapiolani hospital in Hawaii on 08.04.61.
"..." directing the defendant to release by February 26 his school enrolment records and financial aid application records from Occidental college, Columbia University, Harvard university and Punahoa high school
"..."directing the defendant to release by February 26 any and all passpor applications"
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
"MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Taitz v Obama (QW - DC district court)"
Boy, that JD via correspondence school is glaringly obvious.
INB4TT (in before the trolls)
Great, I’m in before the AFTER-birther trolls.
I’m confused ... a case # is shown .. is this
an actual case on Judge Lamberth’s docket ?
Here is the basis of the motion:
I got myself sanctioned and am about to be disbarred. Therefore, Obama must turn over his birth certificate and financial aid records (seriously, why?), because that will somehow prevent me from being disbarred.
Or wait till late night....They’re only paid for a few hours at a time.
What, is there a light or something that goes off in your basement everytime an Orly thread is posted?
You wouldn’t believe the technology that George Soros can pay for.
Maybe they're on a bong break, it's taking longer than usual.
I’m sure, what’s he paying you?
I admit I haven’t been following this as closely as I should. So......what’s the over/under on this thing really going anywhere? I’m asking sincerely; no sarcasm here.
$135,000/annual. Three weeks vacation. 410K. Health Insurance. HSA. Accidental dismemberment.
Doesn't make sense since they give you "accidental dismemberment"
Apparently the school saves a lot of money by leaving Rule 11 out of their Precedure textbooks.
I think a recusal motion is for jurists and a motion for withdrawl is for opposing counsel
I have little faith in the courts in this matter ... or for many others quite frankly
nice! Definitely should get some sort of award for that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.