Oh she's crazy...like a fox. The whole incompetent thing is a ruse. She's actually involved in generating the fake birth certificates to make us look nutty.
Clever girl.
Posted on 03/08/2010 4:54:37 PM PST by Man50D
The thing I didn’t like from that video was not Orly Taitz but playing those background scenes of Obama events. I found that distracting and annoying to the topic at hand.
in fairness, one can question Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS and still think Taitz is nuts. That is the problem with having one person be the ‘face’ of the eligibility questioners.
In all seriousness I ask the question again...for those who call Orly Taitz nuts on what basis, reason or assumption do you label her as nuts? I want to know that point of view because I see an intelligent, cogent and passionate person in pursuit of truth. Tell us why she is “Nuts”.
I'm so convinced that Barry Soetoro is not constitutionally eligible that I've moved on to something much more damning on his fabricated past. But I'm glad Orly has not let go of the dragging affirmative action fraud foot at this point. How will we get change int he vetting system if we stop demanding this particular bastard provide his bonefides?
Do not think, removing Obama from Office is even a consideration by those seeking Obama's verifiable and authentic validation of American birth.
At this point, they DO want to insure that Obama is elligible to run - and that he must prove that he is authentically elligible; before he engages fully, for 2012. Something that, by whatever nefarious measures; Obama has heretofore, NOT done.
Fool America 'once' shame on America; fool twice. . .and we are doomed. And in truth; we may already be. . .but I pray that is not the case/sigh.
(Obama lives in a 'den of thieves'; really, he can trust no one; he has better watch himself and those closest to him; because it is 'they' - irrespective of any birth certificate - who would throw him under the bus; if they ever need him there.)
I don’t know that he has usurped the Constitution and neither do you. We should steer clear of the insane, it does the cause no good at all.
By what she says and how she acts.
We? We?
You aren't involved, you aren't helping with this "silly thing" so stfu and go fight socialism your way.
Orly has more balls than most Conservatives and is doing her best to fight socialism the best way she knows how.
Be more specific...what does she say and by how she acts?
While I agree the fight is socialism; this poser must be shown for 'who/what' he is. Our Constitution matters; or it should.
For one thing, this lawyer/dentist has been laughed out of every court she has stepped foot in. She is hapless in every appearance on these left wing shows. She is embarrassing.
“D&C” means “Dilation and Curettage.” I wouldn’t mind if someone did that to him.
It is a still common form of early abortion, scrapping the lining and contents from the inside of the Uterus.
I don’t think you’re embarrassed. In fact, I think you relish the opportunity to trash this woman without having even a centilla of education to back up your assertion that she’s crazy. ... I can tell you from education, she is not even close to insane. She is dedicated, and dogged, and she is exquisitely sane ... and that probably worries you. Perhaps you would do well to use ‘eccentric’ rather than a term you clearly do not comprehend.
Then neither is the socialism that he brought with him to the Oval Office.
Why do you keep posting all that? We’ve all seen it before. You’re just cluttering up the thread. How ‘bout some new material?
Because a patriot, Attorney Taitz, is at point,
and saboteurs are attacking her,
and there are lurkers who do not know the background.
Your point is?
I agree. Orly is a nut.
Oh she's crazy...like a fox. The whole incompetent thing is a ruse. She's actually involved in generating the fake birth certificates to make us look nutty.
Clever girl.
I will acknowledge Dr. Taitz is passionate about this subject, and intelligent. Cogent, not so much. It’s admirable that she could come to the US, pass both the dental boards and the CA bar exam. All in a second language. I know I couldn’t do that.
But as to how she could be considered ‘nuts’ (which *I* didn’t call her but accept that many others do):
The first thing that came to my mind was her conduct following a hearing (in Sept as I recall) in the CA case. She misinformed the public and her client, Alan Keyes, that the case was going forward. In fact, all the judge did was set a (possible) date for a trial in case the motion to dismiss wasn’t granted.
The Clerk set the date on the court’s calendar. A purely administrative function following a hearing Taitz herself attended and should have understood. She then put out a presser, and Keyes put out a presser, over a clerical confirmation on the record of what the judge had told Taitz just a few days before at a hearing. So not only Taitz, but Keyes also, looked foolish.
Similarly, her ‘misunderstanding’ the discovery question and saying she’d have Obama sitting at a deposition in thirty days.
Her attacking the judge in GA wasn’t all that professional. Her claim that Holder was in GA, and meeting with the judge in a coffee shop near the court wasn’t particularly professional, either. It was foolish.
She acts on emotion, and not the law or precedent, which guides an attorney. It may make fun reading and long threads, but does absolutely nothing to advance the question of Obama’s eligibility; if anything, it’s counterproductive and has tarred anyone who’s raised the questions.
There are reasons the officer/client in GA fired her .. among them, as I recall, were the filing of a reconsideration motion which the client told her not to do. And, I think a few of the CA clients dropped her. She’s involved in litigation with her former assistant/drafter, with the inspector who provided the “Kenyan birth certificate” and with some other attorneys. It seems not to be just some random “after-birthers” who have come to the conclusion that the woman is either ‘nuts’ or totally incompetent.
She may be, outside this context, the nicest person on earth, but she has not in any way advanced the question of Obama’s eligibility. She has merely sucked up all the energy and brought into question the legitimacy of a perfectly legitimate constitutional question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.