Skip to comments.Clinton's Waco Actions Render Claims of OKC Bombing Cover Up More Believable Than Ever
Posted on 04/20/2010 1:29:06 PM PDT by BobMcCartyWrites
If President Bill Clinton was responsible for the deaths at Waco, then claims about his involvement in an Oklahoma City Bombing cover up become more plausible.
This video shows former Clinton advisor Dick Morris sharing details with Fox News Channel's Sean Hannity of a deal made between President Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno related to the tragedy in Waco. In short, according to Morris, Reno threatened Clinton by saying she would tell the world how he was in charge of the mishandling of events which resulted in the deaths of 82 Branch Davidians -- including 20 children -- and four federal agents at the Texas prairie compound of David Koresh and his followers.
The statements by Morris come seven months after I published four posts based on exclusive interviews with two people who suspect President Clinton engaged in a cover up of details about who, in addition to Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, was responsible for the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City two years to the day after the Waco siege began.
One of the people with whom I spoke was David P. Schippers, a man who served as chief investigative counsel during the Clinton Impeachment Hearings in the U.S. House of Representatives and in similar proceedings in the Senate. Below is an excerpt from the Sept. 30 post in which I recounted my interview with the Chicago-based attorney:
I began the interview by asking Schippers why no one had pursued Hussain Al-Hussaini, the Iraqi native Davis identified in her book as the third terrorist who, along with Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, carried out the attack?
My honest opinion is that the original shot was made by (President Bill) Clinton in 1995, he explained. Remember, it was 1995, and he had lost the congress both houses of Congress and people were saying he would never get reelected, and his numbers were way the hell down.
If he had had another attack against the United States, he would have had to act, and he didnt do a damn thing on the first Twin Towers bombing, he continued. Clinton said, Lets not overreact, and, at that time, we had the Department of Justice with (Janet) Reno in there who was completely politicized, and I think (Clinton) just decided were not going to do it.
Schippers continued, riding a bipartisan train of thought.
Now, why didnt the (President George W.) Bush people do it? he asked rhetorically. Thats the one that really bothered me. We deliberately waited until Reno and that gang got out of the administration and then Bush came in.
Unfortunately, no one ever bit on the information Schippers said a president could have used as a legitimate reason to invade Iraq, and he blames it on a pact between the Bushes and Clintons something akin to the mutually-assured destruction mindset that prevailed during the Cold War between Russia and the United States.
The other person I interviewed was Jayna Davis, award-winning investigative reporter and author of The New York Times Best Seller about the OKC Bombing, The Third Terrorist. In three posts published Sept. 28, I share details of the interview during which she broke her four-year silence with the media and spoke to me about the OKC Bombing video tapes the FBI refuses to release -- most likely, because they will reveal that officials at the highest levels of government knew more than they let on.
File this under "Once Bitten, Twice Shy".
Something wasn’t right about what happend in Oklahoma City and the aftermath. Why was it so important to destroy the building so fast before the investigation was complete? So many questiuons that have no believable answer!
This all happened before I began paying attention to anything political. Is there also a “truther” group on OKC and Waco? And how would a “truther” group on those events differ, politically, from the 9/11 truthers of today?
Definitely something odd happened there. Just the fact that it happened despite the fact that McVeigh couldn’t turn around without bumping into a fed or someone in contact with the feds makes me suspect a major screw up at the least.
The Greatest Mystery about WACO 3 or 4 Slain ATF Agents were Clinton Body Guards
[Clinton said so himself in the Cash Room Speech]
The Third Terrorist.....A Very Good Book!
I think it’s pretty clear there was a coverup of Okc bombing. But i think it’s a federal “cop level” thing, happily supported by the Clintons.
There were guys seen with bomb sniffing dogs earlier that morning outside around the Murrah building. NO ATF was inside,, etc.
I think they knew a “bombing” was planned, and were really prepared for a pipe bomb, etc,,. They got caught flat footed by a mid-east style monster size truck bomb. We would have all been better had they just told us that,, instead, they stonewall and never admit a mistake.
And i think it’s interesting that Nichols spent a LOT of time on the specific island in the Philippines, at the specific university environment where that islamic Bojinka plot to blow up 10 airliners came from.
They clearly havent told us the truth. Clintin was too happy to blame the NRA and Rush Limbaugh.
This forum is founded on Truth about Waco and other Clinton crimes. That’s our beginning. We’ved covered it inside and out. You’ll find few in Talk Radio who could disagree with us about it. Now the revelation by Dick Morris and Rush firing a shot across Clinton’s bow — it’s all resurfacing.
Guess I’ve got a lot of catching up to do ;)
There are a ton of threads here on FR...search OKC Bombing and tags such as that...amazing stuff.
Thank you both!
McVeigh was bought and paid for...and that's why he was quickly "offed"...dead men tell no tales...
"Another Conspiracy Theory intrigued me because I could never disprove it. The theory seemed unlikely on its face: Ramzi Yousef or Khalid Sheik Muhammad had taught Terry Nichols how to blow up the Oklahoma Federal Building. The problem was that, upon investigation, we established that both Ramzi Yousef and Nichols had been in the city of Cebu on the same days. I had been to Cebu years earlier; it is on an island in the central Philippines. It was a town in which word could have spread that a local girl was bringing her American boy friend home and that the American hated the U.S. government.
"Yousef and Khalid Sheik Muhammad had gone there to help create an al Qaeda spinoff, a Philippine affiliate chapter, named after a hero of the Afghan war against the Soviets, Abu Sayaff. Could the al Qaeda explosives expert have been introduced to the angry American who proclaimed his hatred for the U.S. Government? We do not know, despite some FBI investigation. We do know that Nichols's bombs did not work before his Philippine stay and were deadly when he returned. We also know that Nichols continued to call Cebu long after his wife returned to the United States. The final coincidence is that several al Qaeda operatives had attended a radical Islamic conference a few years earliler in, of all places, Oklahoma City."
("Against All Enemies", p. 127)
It's all chronicled right here. Gonna take you awhile!
Of course they do!
Some of us never doubted that for a minute!
I’ve heard that McVeigh was just a fall guy of sorts and that he was not the real bomber of the building. And that he’s not really dead. I don’t know what to believe regarding that, but it kind of sounds like the truthers version of 9/11.
That’s kinda how I look at it. They knew something was going down and they screwed up.
Lots of interesting terrorist ties to Oklahoma City as well. Like the fact that Zachariahs Mussoui used Nick Berg’s computer while they both happened to be in town at the same time prior to 9/11.
The Buck Stops with Reno.
No problem KGG...I think Ovrtaxt and Politicalmom had some posts/threads about Oklahoma happenings awhile back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.