[tacticalogic]

It is nice, it disproves your comment that the guy had not addressed others, which he had already done in a previous article and noted in the current one

Disproof would be something in the article addressing others. What he did or did not address elsewhere is not in evidence. He calls articles of impeachment to be drawn up against Ron Paul. Everyone else gets a pass.

[ejonesie22]

So let me get this straight.

In an article solely and specifically about Ron Paul where the author is kind enough to mention that he has previously written about the same basic issue with other politicians, even to the point where he names the article for reference, you are upset because in this article, again only about Ron Paul and his "followers" he only specifically speaks of Ron Paul.

TacticaLOGIC right?