Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whose Country is This?
CDS ^ | 4/25/2010 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 04/26/2010 8:57:30 PM PDT by ezfindit

With the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.

Arizona acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America’s immigration laws. “We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act,” said Gov. Jan Brewer. “But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable situation.”

We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?

He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativedatingsite.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: aliens; citizens; constitution; defense; illegalimmigration; jobs; mexico; obamafailure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 04/26/2010 8:57:30 PM PDT by ezfindit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

” We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?

He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.

He has denounced Arizona as “misguided.” He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona’s sheriffs and police do not violate anyone’s civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.”


2 posted on 04/26/2010 9:11:33 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit
"...said Gov. Jan Brewer..."We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington."

Interesting choice of words, but I don't disagree with her.

Washington, has indeed failed in its primary duties to The People and the several States.

But it's actually worse than that, now that the ruling Marxist Democrat party is in charge. They've now exceeded all expectations of mere failure, and are now in full-blown TREASON to The People.

3 posted on 04/26/2010 9:12:15 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

Ping!

Pat Buchanan? Took him awhile...


4 posted on 04/26/2010 9:17:44 PM PDT by HiJinx (~ Illegal is a Crime, it is not a Race ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Obummer will fix Arizona’s wagon by passing amnesty.


5 posted on 04/26/2010 9:18:44 PM PDT by Minipax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

AZVotes


6 posted on 04/26/2010 9:19:09 PM PDT by FrankR (Standing up against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future will belong to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

“Let us see how many African-Americans, who are today frozen out of the 8 million jobs held by illegal aliens that might otherwise go to them or their children, will march to defend an invasion for which they are themselves paying the heaviest price.”

Boy is he right there. That’s the crazy thing about it. It hurts their demographics the worst BY FAR.


7 posted on 04/26/2010 9:23:56 PM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti2

Yes! And rewards incompetent business owners who refuse to face reality and rely on pseudo-slaves to make up for their failure to remain competitive via automation, IT, or other more sustainable means.


8 posted on 04/26/2010 9:34:07 PM PDT by ezfindit (ConservativeDatingSite.com - The Right Place for Conservative Singles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

Whose country is this? That is the most important question that needs to be answered. I used to believe that this was one nation Under God, and that the leaders in the government governed at the will of the people. I no longer believe this to be true. Our political leaders in Washington live as if God were dead and that the people live by permission of the government. Justice is defined by whatever is in the interest of the state. Morality is determined by nine people on the Supreme Court, who are chosen by politicians. I am not certain to whom this country belongs, but it does not belong to the people.


9 posted on 04/26/2010 9:36:11 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
Took him a while....????

They just passed the law a few days ago, and he's the first that I know of that has written about it.

10 posted on 04/26/2010 9:38:01 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

These people are running around smearing swastikas on state buildings with refried beans. Are they what we want as fellow citizens?


11 posted on 04/26/2010 10:33:19 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (WARNING: Your Conservative vote in November is going to make college students very angry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Pat has been pounding this issue home since the early 1990s. He tried to tell the nation what hell it was going to pay for ignoring the invading hordes.

I think he’s just sick of what has and is still taking place. Being disgusted with it, he just tends to ignore it these days.

People didn’t buy in. He’s hoarse from screaming about it.

I don’t blame him for not commenting on it before now.

It has been a very lonely place to be, angry about illegal immigration and what it’s done to our nation. And now it’s all but too late to do anything about it.

This will go nowhere IMO. High roller Republicans want the cheap labor. Low baller Democrats just want to destroy our nation.


12 posted on 04/26/2010 10:36:49 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Be still & kneel before the know-nothing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr., may fleas be upon him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
Too bad the Obama administration can't feel the pulse of the people.....or count to ten correctly.

The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states by the Constitution of the United States are reserved to the states or the people.

Safety and protection are federal responsibilties for the whole but where given negligence of those responsbilities in certain states, as has been the case, it behooves the states to act in their own best interest.

We are obligated to act in our best interests.
13 posted on 04/26/2010 10:55:46 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Buchanan has been standing on the border since his visit there in 2000, waiting for everyone else, LOL.

Remember, the anti-Buchanan Freepers claimed he was a hypocrite because he took one step over the border into Mexico illegally and he should be arrested.


14 posted on 04/26/2010 11:01:04 PM PDT by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: donna; DoughtyOne

Hmmm...I didn’t expect to take heat for that comment!

I well remember the good ol’ days when Buchanan and Tancredo were voices in the Wilderness.

I’m starting to get burned out after hitting the ping list since Friday with all the ink this issue has gotten. I was surprised at the time that I didn’t see something from Pat before today. I was also surprised to see Tancredo make comments against SB1070. That caused a serious double-take this morning.


15 posted on 04/27/2010 12:04:41 AM PDT by HiJinx (~ Illegal is a Crime, it is not a Race ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

You can’t breathe around here without getting jumped on lately. I blame Bush, LOL.

Seriously, it’s like the whole country wants to riot.


16 posted on 04/27/2010 12:16:07 AM PDT by donna (SarahPAC has donated money to...(wait for it)...Lindsey Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: donna

I hear you...sounds like a cultural chasm is in the making.
Gonna call it a night...


17 posted on 04/27/2010 12:19:11 AM PDT by HiJinx (~ Illegal is a Crime, it is not a Race ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Thanks for the response HiJinx. Sorry to have been so negative. I’m so used to folks going after Pat for any number of things, I just didn’t want something to slip by when he has actually been one of the best on the topic.

Your observations are reasoned. Take care.


18 posted on 04/27/2010 12:35:31 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Be still & kneel before the know-nothing Omnipotent One, Il Douche' Jr., may fleas be upon him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

If they are illegal immigrants, by definition they are law breakers. So what is the problem in enforcing the law? As for “civil rights”, in the first place these people, by definition, are not part of the “civil population”. In the second place it’s not as if they are all going to be lined up against a wall and shot. Enforcement of any law implies some kind of coercion, but it doesn’t have to mean cruelty, and its disingenious of the president to imply otherwise.


19 posted on 04/27/2010 3:51:12 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit
What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed? He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty. He has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.

It need to be said, and said clearly: Barack Hussein Obama is committing treason by siding with the lawbreakers and illegal invaders to this nation. He is not upholding the Constitution, which he swore as an oath to defend.


This is grounds for Impeachment.

This isn't diddling an intern and lying about it in a sexual harassment lawsuit.

This is siding with a foreign government(s) (primarily Mexico) against American citizens and their Constitutional rights.

I am not chanting "Black Helicopter" rhetoric. I don't think the MSM, the Democrats, or anyone else fully realizes what Barack Hussein Obama has done in the last 48 hours.

We are on VERY dangerous ground.

20 posted on 04/27/2010 4:45:47 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus
These people are running around smearing swastikas on state buildings with refried beans.

I read that and saw a video. The crowd was violent, pushing, and throwing things.

And yet it was the peaceful Tea Party participants who have been smeared by the Media, the Democrats, and pResident Obama.

21 posted on 04/27/2010 4:47:39 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

Whose country is it?

Welll the elite think they own it...as well they should. A progressive income tax basically allows the very wealthy, who can buy anything they like, to buy a government. And We the People have sold it to them.

When 1% of the population pays 40% of the income tax, 5% pays 60%, 10% pays 70%....well the other 90% are naturally going to have little or no say.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html

IMHO, BTW, its the reason I believe the courts cannot find “standing” for anyone to question Obama’s selection by the elites as their leader.


22 posted on 04/27/2010 4:54:00 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nosterrex

Whose country is it?

Welll the elite think they own it...as well they should. A progressive income tax basically allows the very wealthy, who can buy anything they like, to buy a government. And We the People have sold it to them.

When 1% of the population pays 40% of the income tax, 5% pays 60%, 10% pays 70%....well the other 90% are naturally going to have little or no say.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/news/show/22652.html

IMHO, BTW, its the reason I believe the courts cannot find “standing” for anyone to question Obama’s selection by the elites as their leader.


23 posted on 04/27/2010 5:04:08 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mo
Welll the elite think they own it...as well they should. A progressive income tax basically allows the very wealthy, who can buy anything they like, to buy a government. And We the People have sold it to them. When 1% of the population pays 40% of the income tax, 5% pays 60%, 10% pays 70%....well the other 90% are naturally going to have little or no say.

Under Obama, they people who pay little or no tax are getting "free" money handed to them in the form of the Earned Income Tax Credit, which is welfare by any other name.

Earned Income Tax Credit is a Welfare Scam

People who pay no taxes, are are not even citizens, receive FREE medical care in hospitals. Even routine care treated in ERs is free to them.

Under the new health care scheme, people who pay nothing in taxes are going to be eligible for better care than people who have to pay for it. In fact, the new law (no longer a bill) calls for offices for "minority health" and "civil rights." These are already being enacted.

There are elites who have bought politicians, and the system. But under Obama, it is the non-payers that have won the lottery.

Everything is "free."

24 posted on 04/27/2010 5:45:59 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Tancredo’s reaction stunned me. I would like to hear more from him about the law- I hope he was taken out of context or something...

Something my dad told me when I wanted to help with a campaign when I was in high school- he told me to always remember a politician is in the end a politician. Though I know of no political reason it would benefit Tancredo to change horses in mid-stream.


25 posted on 04/27/2010 6:25:46 AM PDT by Tammy8 (~Secure the border and deport all illegals- do it now! ~ Support our Troops!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus

Corporations know this -

you must limit the influx of hires from specific other companies because the hires will bring the “culture” of their former employer with them and “pollute” the culture of the business, a business that is more successful (they’re hiring) than the business that was laying off.

The way to solve this is to allow a trickle from the other culture, “forcing” them to conform to the successful culture of their new home or employer.

It makes sense,

UNLESS YOUR GOALS INCLUDE THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SUCCESSFUL CULTURE.


26 posted on 04/27/2010 6:29:56 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit
...He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.

He has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.

...What are we doing to our own people?

Whose country is this, anyway?

27 posted on 04/27/2010 6:36:33 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit; Admin Moderator

It’s a shame Pat’s name isn’t in the headline....maybe the mods will fix it. He was at the forefront of this issue for years.......should be a great thread


28 posted on 04/27/2010 6:37:11 AM PDT by MadelineZapeezda (Promoted by God to be a mother!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...................Thanks, Susan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
In the second place it’s not as if they are all going to be lined up against a wall and shot.

To hear some talk, you'd think they were. I'm sure it's not pleasant to be "racially profiled" or to be asked for ID, but where is the sympathy for the millions of Americans and legal immigrants who've been beaten, robbed, raped, killed, hit by illegal alien drunk drivers, caught diseases from illegals; not to mention the many who've lost their jobs or seen their wages go down, those who've had their identities stolen, kids whose schools are now dangerous, ineffective and overcrowded; people whose neighborhoods are ruined, and on and on and on? We're supposed to be outraged because somebody might be asked for ID. Well, sorry. I'm too busy being outraged about all of the above.

29 posted on 04/27/2010 7:08:02 AM PDT by Nea Wood (Silly liberal . . . paychecks are for workers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

Apparenlty the Country belongs to those lazy, over fed over paid serial criminals who sit in Congress. At least they act like it does.


30 posted on 04/27/2010 7:28:16 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Mexico’s Immigration Law: Let’s Try It Here at Home
Human Events | 05/08/2006 | J. Michael Waller
FR Posted 4/27/10 by Mount Athos

Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.

That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

* in the country legally;

* have the means to sustain themselves economically;

* not destined to be burdens on society;

* of economic and social benefit to society;

* of good character and have no criminal records; and

* contributors to the general well-being of the nation.

The law also ensures that:

* immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;

* foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;

* foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;

* foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;

* foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;

* those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.

Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens — and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.

It is an interesting law — and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry.

We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. [1] Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

* Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)

* Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

* Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)

* The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

* Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)

* A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)

* A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

* Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)

* Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

* Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

* Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

* Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working with out a permit — can also be imprisoned.

Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

* “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)

* Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

* Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)

Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

* A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

* Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.


31 posted on 04/27/2010 11:50:27 AM PDT by Liz (If teens can procreate in a Volkswagen, why does a spotted owl need 2000 acres? JD Hayworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mo

As I said, I wonder just who does own the country. When the government can take away someones land and decide for what a person’s property can be used, such as wetlands, the federal government can do anything that it wants to do. Who runs the government? I suspect it is the golden rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.


32 posted on 04/27/2010 12:31:28 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit
Mexicans have been taught from birth that Arizona is part of Mexico. This photo was taken in SoCal, not Mexico.

If we don't fight for it, we'll lose the SW in a generation.


33 posted on 04/27/2010 4:16:10 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

And it got him called every ugly name you can think of by some so-called ‘conservatives’, at least one of whom was supporting Hanoi back when Pat was working for Nixon.


34 posted on 04/27/2010 9:07:15 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: donna

“Remember, the anti-Buchanan Freepers claimed he was a hypocrite because he took one step over the border into Mexico illegally and he should be arrested.”

That’s when they weren’t busy calling him a nazi.


35 posted on 04/27/2010 9:08:17 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus

“These people are running around smearing swastikas on state buildings with refried beans. Are they what we want as fellow citizens?”

Out here in SoCal they routinely throw frozen cans of soda at elderly Americans who show up at rallies. And in one incident of this sort the Anaheim police simply stood by and did nothing.


36 posted on 04/27/2010 9:12:08 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

What’s unusual about that picture is that the Aztlan Brown Berets aren’t wearing ski masks. I guess they weren’t planning on any serious crime that day.


37 posted on 04/27/2010 9:14:08 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
In this photo you can see one wearing a scarf bandido-style. I had a "debrief" on these guys from a "knowledgeable individual." They are pretty sophisticated. Look at the guys all in black. They are "semi-plainclothed" BBs. That is, they can recognize each other for support, but are not "in uniform." This is so they can throw punches etc without being ID'd as a BB. Then they have other totally plainclothed guys with radios as scouts and flankers. And also guys in cars with radios for mobile scouting. They seem like a joke, but they're not. Look at the big photo above again, check out the old BB giving the 'hermano' grip and grin with the older policeman. The cop is at the left in profile, the handshake is just above the banner. They are buds, clearly. More cops were about 100' behind the banner. If not for their presence, I would have been under the boots ten seconds after snapping that photo, instead of just being roughed up.
38 posted on 04/28/2010 4:34:06 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

39 posted on 04/28/2010 4:34:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Imagine if some militia operated in public the way that these Aztlan Brown Beret thugs do. A paramilitary group advocating the overthrow of America, a group that masks themselves and violently attacks Americans in street demonstrations.

You know about them. I know about them. The police certainly know about them. And so does the press, which ignores them. It’s an openly operating criminal conspiracy and nothing is done about it. It’s what you get when both Bush and Obama and their political flunkies pander to latino voters. They aren’t even willing to prosecute a violent, racist group because they don’t want to ‘offend’ other latinos. What a hell of a country we have come to live in.


40 posted on 04/28/2010 8:19:09 AM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

And the MSM pretends they don’t exist.


41 posted on 04/28/2010 10:39:19 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit

bump


42 posted on 04/28/2010 10:40:55 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit
De-blogged link
43 posted on 04/28/2010 10:53:48 AM PDT by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Amazingly enough Limbaugh has discovered the illegal alien problem today. Better late than never. Or should I say “finally, we don’t a Republican President pushing treason this time.”


44 posted on 04/28/2010 11:06:26 AM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yes, Rush was quite silent when Bush was pushing amnesty (aka “immigration reform”).


45 posted on 04/28/2010 11:07:49 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ezfindit
Question: "Whose Country is This?"

Response: Take a real good look at those in office. Use of one's senses, sight and sound and in some instances smell, will reveal the truth as to those who think it is theirs.

Comment: If we really want to change what is happening to our country we are going to have to fight-literally! The coalition coming into power are not going to voluntarily surrender. I don't think we are ready. I don't think we have the leadership at this time.

46 posted on 04/28/2010 11:27:48 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Peter Brimelow has described how he would approach Rush over the years asking him to get involved in speaking out about the evils of illegal immigration. Limbaugh would hem and haw and give Peter mealy mouthed excuses and would continue to screen out any and all calls about illegal aliens.

And then came Bush’s big amnesty push and the ensuing revolt of the American public. Rush was put in danger of being revealed as being totally irrelevant to one of the major grassroots political uprisings of his time. Suddenly Rush was yelling “wait! wait! I’m your leader! wait for me!!” and immigration would get discussed, oh, once every six months or so. Now that Obama is the third term of Bush’s amnesty push Rush is discussing the issue.

What I expect is that soon enough he will be using the “F-word”: ‘enforcment FIRST’, meaning we should all embrace amnesty once something is done at the border itself. Nothing will be done about deporting the 20-30 million illegal aliens already here. This is the fallback position of the Treason Lobby and we will soon be hearing it from them. I’d look for Michael Medved to be the stalking horse.


47 posted on 04/28/2010 11:35:09 AM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Medved was totally pro-amnesty until his listeners really hammered him back. Then reluctantly he moved to “secure the border first.” This is totally misguided. ANY amnesty, and we’re cooked. Ten million new ‘rat welfare voters means the ‘rats win forever.


48 posted on 04/28/2010 12:36:24 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Yep. Medved’s instincts were lousy when he was a 20-something communist and he’s still not someone to trust. When Medved comes out for a particular candidate I start looking for what has to be wrong with him.

He’s spent a lot of his ‘conservative’ years purging people he doesn’t like, like Buchanan in the past and JD Hayworth right now. Unlike Ho and Red Ron Dellums, these are the sort of men whose reputations Medved is willing to trash.


49 posted on 04/28/2010 12:49:32 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I can’t stand MM.


50 posted on 04/28/2010 4:02:34 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson