Posted on 05/13/2010 6:55:35 AM PDT by mainestategop
The following are from a series of letters that came from a youtube viewer named sherkey. A liberal nut job if ever there was.
You mean Bush that took a surplus from Clinton and tore up the country to financial ruin.that Bush. The one that did not have the honesty to keep war spending in the federal budget , but rather put it in a emergency supplemental bill that Bush who allowed schools, mosques and fir houses to be built in Afghanistan and Iraq While New Orleans burned. That Bush that did not have the balls to raise taxes for the two silly wars we were in, but borrowed from China, again and again and again. That Bush who signed a new prescription drug benefit that was not funded. that Bush who ignored pay as you and deficit neutrality that Clinton did to make a surplus. that Bush was declared business bankruptcy twice in his lifetime and went Harvard business school and still had huge deficits. Reagen = large deficits Bush I = huge deficits Bush Baby II= massive, massive deficits all on his watch
Little child, stand on the side of the road and let progressices run the country. If people wanted to get rid of social security, unemployment and medicaid, they would have voted in huge majorities of republicans again and again, but what happened democrats have enjoyed that luxury
Good luck teaturd and Drill baby Drill HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH
That is so funny, you told me to spell correctly and you misspell yourself HAHAHAHHAHAHA
As opposed to Reagan 10.8% Unemployment double digit unemployment, and quadrupled the deficit, (you spelled deficit, deficient hahaha)
As opposed to Reagan who actually made millions of illegal aliens, American citizens in 1986 HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
As opposed to The Bush clowns and Reagan who gave trillions and trillions to farmers for their crack welfare payments and their votes HAHAHAHAHA
As opposed to Reagan and the Bushes who failed to win the war of terror and drugs (ie crackheads like you ) HAHAHAHAHAHA and Bush baby II who took crack cocaine before he was 40. he was for it before he was against it HAHAHAHAHHA
Obama signed into law Guns in national parks, No republican can say that HHAHAHAHA
Reagan giving chemical weapons to Iraq early 1980's (Saddam Hussein) HAHAHAHA
Reagan = Selling arms to Iran, see Iran Contra our mortal enemy HAHAHAHAHAHA
Bush 1 and 2 like Reagan created massive massive deficits
Jimmy carter = A stump of a fool like the two Bushes and Reagan HAHAHHAHAHAHA
If the majority of Americans wanted no social programs like Social security, unemployment and Medicaid, they would have kept in republican majorities for a long long time Guess what? they did not HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
mainestategop = dumba**
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one, but he is in praise that Obama signed a law allowing guns in National parks
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat, but he pokes his business into other peoples business, ie, The FISA act, and gay marriage
If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks of ways to skew the intelligence i.e Weapons of mass Destruction
A liberal (Obama like Reagan, ) brings Russia to the table and reduces nuclear arsenals and takes his time and decides the surge in Afghanistan will work and does
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly bangs the door stalls ie Larry Craig (R) Idaho, and Mark Foley (R) Florida uses government computers quietly to solicit homosexual activities
If a black man and Hispanic are conservatives, they see themselves as independently successful, and uses the RNC general fund to go to strip clubs and spend money for conventions in Hawaii.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about Limbaugh who broke the law doctor shopping, and Nixon who broke thousands of laws.
If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he only watches fox news channel, and limits himself and the same fox news who are biased and set up the 912 project that is the Teabbagers org.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he becomes a democrat and believes in Jefferson separation between church and State
If a conservative decides he needs health care, and he is 65 years and older, he gladly puts his hands out for his social security and Medicaid. If he loses his job, he appreciates the unemployment that he gets from the Government.
If a Conservative is a farmer, 100% of farmers are conservative, he gladly accepts the welfare handouts that are in the trillions and trillions, while condemning the poor and minorities that get the welfare also Fair enough on the spelling. You know you mentioned Libraries.......This is another taxpayer funded enterprise so you see government can work outside of the constitution. libraries are not mentioned in the Constitution so this social idea works out fine, agree?
If Government has no business in marriage, especially gay marriage, then Government has no business telling women what hey have to do with their bodies. that is why Roe V Wade is there, and I see that the republicans did not do anything to overturn it.
To me, anyone can exercise their first Amendment rights as far as parades are concerned, if this means having parades like the Irish, the Italians and the Mexicans do as well.
Reagan, granted did good in bringing Russia to the bargaining table, but can you praise Obama for doing the same thing last week?
As far as people getting their news from whatever ideology, to each its own, but if you just watch fox news then it is slanted. Are MSNBC and CNN slanted? Of course, but it is wise to shuffle through all the slanted stuff that ALL news does and seek the truth.
Sorry Fox news is slanted, because who sets up the 912 project? Glen beck and that becomes biased news. Sean Hannity, Neil Cavuto advertising the April 15th teabag project and then going live on April 15th last year at the teabag party that are only opposed to Obama. That is very very slanted. What if MSNBC did that or CNN, you would accuse them of slanted journalism. Also do you really think these newscasters care? No because, all they do is sell their wares and junk non stop to the teabaggers. If CNN or MSNBC newscasters sold their liberal crap, you would go off the head..
you cannot tell me there is a difference between welfare for the poor and welfare for the farmer? You generalize when you talk about the 8 kids that some one of color has. Welfare reform done in the 1990's by the republicans and Clinton gave them a 5 year window in their lifetime, and I am alright with that. the only difference is that generations of farmers love that crack welfare. there is no difference. period and taxes do not paint the picture. I am talking about the farmers who have distain for liberal governments but are not principled enough to send the money given to them back. that is hypocrisy plain and simple.
You say Social security is bankrupt. I remember All Gore talk about a lock box, and you all laughed at him and bush raided it and took a lot out. His policies that have got us into the depression in the first place did away with all the jobs that always put money into it. Bush = no lock box.
Also you lament about the government going bankrupt. bush funded the war by not raising taxes, and borrowed heavily from China to be precise. Bush kept the $2.3 trillion debt of the war outside of the federal process, i.e the emergency supplemental . Obama took that and put all the emergency supplemental into the actual federal budget for the first time thus raising the government debt in the federal budget. You say families and churches need to be involved? Are you kidding me. Of course your Christian ideology leaves out atheist who are Americans also. typical reasoning. You people on the right do not believe in abortion, but you are all unwilling to help the ghettos of America deal with this problem. You say " the farmers work for a living as opposed to the 30 year old slut grandmothers and their 8 bastard kids with bastard litters of their own who refuse to work" Again, you oppose abortion, but condemn them and give them nothing. You say also "Families and churches need to be involved?" that worked out well in the States that got hit bad with hurricane katrina. bushes non response to katrina proved that that crap of families and churches do not work but the federal government has to be involved also. look at the flooding in the midlands currently. national Guard units and federal departments like homeland security are involved. please tell those people to just rely on their families and churches. tell then not to rely on rescue workers from FEMO and the helicopters, and boats and emergency medical tents set up to help the citizens.
You did not complain when the same government you do not want to help your fellow Americans spent billions building mosques, schools, and firehouse in Iraq and Afghanistan and the handing out of American taxpayer dollars to the warlords to bribe them. i would rather have waste spending it on Americans by Americans instead of over there too people who will always hate our guts. You see theocracies do not work over there and you want that to be the law of the land here in the United States.
You talk about China and we will become a fiefdom? Well thanks Bush for borrowing trillions and trillions from them. The gulags and stripped pajamas scare tactics you mention always, do not work as your kind tried that in the 1950's ala McCarthyism and it will not work now.
You say that I will have guilt because of what is happening? Why should I? I think the guilt is on your side. the hypocrisy that your side shows is quite amusing. I saw the Searchlight protest. the signs say "hands off my Medicare"? What ? So you accuse the government of socialism but yet you continue to take SS, unemployment and use Medicaid monthly? How is this principled? It is not. I would have more respect for your side when you turn back in all those social programs you denounced with your silly teabagger protest
you mean the illegal immigrant that Reagen naturalized? All those years that have passed by and the American people could have voted republican teabaggers in for as Rove said a permanent majority. Guess what you had power 1994-2006. You did not repeal those social programs such as social security, unemployment and medicare and only tackled sill y things like the Terry sciavo incident. You were immature and get drunk wit power. that is why for decades Americans have voted in democratic majorities. If they wanted change they would have kept you in power. guess what? They did not. Also drudge reports had a piece that 80% of teabaggers under the age of 65 years of age are taking unemployment checks. Go stand to the side clowns while this great President takes care of business.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bear in mind folks THIS is the kind of constituency we have in America that voted for Obama. We are in serious trouble. Can't even spell right to.
I also left the spelling as is... :)
The ONLY time we have gotten a balanced budget in the last 40 years is when the post 1994 election Republican Congress took the public relations hits to actually reign in the spending. ,p> Contrary to the Progressive mythology spewed by this silly fool, Bill Clinton’s tax hikes did not do that. The last Democrat Congress budget forecast in 1994 forecast $200 billion deficits for the rest of the 1990s. The GOP Congress, not Bill Clinton, produced the surplus.
Amen. keep in mind also he is cancelling out our votes.
“Can’t even spell right to.”
Oh, the bitter irony, too.
Sigh.
I see nearly this much silliness at this site and we’re supposedly “moderated” unlike u-tube...
In fairness, I have a solidly conservative acquaintance who writes much like this when he’s off his psychiatric meds and very, very drunk.
Moonbats are a danger to our Republic. We have to try to convert them one at at time. I have generally stopped trying to defend Bush. He did spend way too much. Unfortunately, Obama makes Bush look like Clarke Howard or Dave Ramsey.
The sad fact is that you will not be able to covert about 30% of the people. They are lost. Forget the moonbats - focus on the uninformed or apathetic electorate that can be swayed. Get them fired up.
The screed reads like a typical rant I hear from liberals. They speed from one topic to another and back again without giving time to discuss in depth any of the issues they’re ranting about. One of the biggest lib myths is how Clinton “created” millions of jobs and balanced the budget. Two things: Clinton rode the tech wave of the nineties and had a Republican congress riding herd on him his last six years holding him to his promises. Does anyone believe there would have been a cap gains tax cut in 1997 without a Pubbie majority? And if they’re going to give Clinton credit for the stock market boom, can we blame him for the Nasdaq crash in 2000 and the ultimate recession? Libs don’t want to talk about that.
99.999% of the world’s idiots frequent Youtube on an hourly basis. I’ve learned never to attempt a respectful conversation with them because they are disgusting freaks who respect nothing but their own “intelligence” (whatever that is).
It’s best simply to play their own game until they stop bothering people. Then people can enjoy the videos and comment without being harassed by leftist vermin.
It is not possible to convert idiots to reason. The only thing that can stop this country from being completely consumed by stupidity is some kind of widespread disaster that wipes out the unfit.
WHOA there! I wouldn’t go that far. A lot of those some would consider unfit might be offended by being compared to people like that.
Opps. I wouldn’t dare compare disabled persons to those leftist vermin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.