Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elena Kagan in 2005: Barack Obama is my hero (VIDEO)
youtube.com/ ^ | 10.05.2005 | Elena Kagan

Posted on 05/13/2010 9:12:38 AM PDT by day21221

video ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWV6YTrWthE&feature=player_embedded#!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: barack; elena; elenakagan; elenakegan; gaygan; heroworship; kagan; kagantruthfile; nakedmarxist; obama; obamaadministration; starkravingsocialist

1 posted on 05/13/2010 9:12:38 AM PDT by day21221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: day21221

I would normal say kneepad city but in this case, I know better


2 posted on 05/13/2010 9:13:27 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
I would normal say kneepad city but in this case, I know better?

LOL!! Yep! But I refuse to make references to a "Wise Lesbina" here.

3 posted on 05/13/2010 9:14:51 AM PDT by ScottinVA (RIP to the country I love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: day21221

From The PatrotPost.US.com:

In her thesis, Kagan lamented the fact that free enterprise overcame socialism and concluded, “A coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness.”
“Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force?” wondered Kagan. “Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties? Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself...”

In her thesis, Kagan lamented the fact that free enterprise overcame socialism and concluded, “In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness. ... In unity lies their only hope.”

Ah, yes, the “hope and change” necessary for Obama to make good on his promise to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.”
Just as Obama was mentored by Marxists, Kagan has been steeped in socialist doctrine, and is no doubt rejoicing in the resurgence of socialism in the U.S. under the leadership of Obama and his water boys in the legislative and judicial branches.

As for her qualifications for a seat on the Supreme Court, Obama insists that Kagan “is an acclaimed legal scholar with a rich understanding of constitutional law.”
In fact, she has exactly no judicial experience and very limited litigation experience. Legal authority Ken Klukowski writes that Kagan is an ideal nominee for Obama: “She’s a liberal without a paper trail.”

http://patriotpost.us/alexander/2010/05/13/komrade-kagan/


4 posted on 05/13/2010 9:15:45 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Google hides Obama’s Social Security Number story
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152937


5 posted on 05/13/2010 9:18:13 AM PDT by day21221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: day21221

right about the time he began campaigning for President


6 posted on 05/13/2010 9:20:17 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Since none of the USA voters can ascertain exactly what NObama’s school history is-——
How can we trust his assessment of this person??

If one stands back & takes a longer look at the NObama administration, it looks more & more like the KING has given all the power outside of what he is holding to all of his sychophants & loudest cheerleaders.

Not too different from Roman times.

NObama has already proven that he can fiddle while the country burns.


7 posted on 05/13/2010 9:20:25 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: day21221
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

From David Horowitz's
FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org

PROFILE: ELENA KAGAN

As an undergraduate at Princeton, Kagan wrote a senior thesis titled

"To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933."

In the "Acknowledgments" section of her work, she specifically thanked her brother Marc, “whose involvement in radical causes led me to explore the history of American radicalism in the hope of clarifying my own political ideas.” In the body of the thesis, Kagan wrote:

"In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness. Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties?...

"Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight one’s fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope."

Lots more on Kagan here:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2398


8 posted on 05/13/2010 9:20:43 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

May 13, 2010

In addition to attacking the First Amendment, Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court also argued against the Second Amendment.

“I’m not sympathetic,” to the Second Amendment, said Kagan.

In 1987 as a U.S. Supreme Court law clerk, Elena Kagan said she was “not sympathetic” toward a man who contended that his constitutional rights were violated when he was convicted for carrying an unlicensed pistol, according to Bloomberg.

The man argued “the District of Columbia’s firearms statutes violate his constitutional right to ‘keep and bear arms,’” Kagan wrote. “I’m not sympathetic.”

Kagan believes the state has the right to impose restrictive gun laws and she disagrees with the language of the Second Amendment.

Kagan told lawmakers last year when she was the nominee for solicitor general that she accepted the 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller as a precedent of the court. “There is no question, after Heller, that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to keep and bear arms,” she said.

Kagan, however, added that the Constitution “provides strong although not unlimited protection against governmental regulation,” thus leaving the door open for future regulation.

In answers to written questions by Patrick Leahy submitted in February of 2009, Kagan said: “Like other nominees to the Solicitor General position, I have refrained from providing my personal opinions of constitutional law (except in areas where I previously have stated opinions), both because those opinions will play no part in my official decisions and because such statements of opinion might be used to undermine the interests of the United States in litigation.”


9 posted on 05/13/2010 9:23:09 AM PDT by day21221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Photoshop a mustache on her and she looks like Paul Blart (Kevin James). No offense to Mr. James intended.


10 posted on 05/13/2010 9:28:53 AM PDT by getarope (One Big Ass Mistake, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Another pinko. Gee Obambi must not know. We were told that “Van Jones” and the Che flags in his Houston campaign office were “flukes”.


11 posted on 05/13/2010 9:38:51 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

I have yet to hear any media, Fox included, mention her socialist views. Why?


12 posted on 05/13/2010 9:45:11 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: day21221

She does NOT belong on the court. Period. End of story!


13 posted on 05/13/2010 10:03:38 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
"A week after Ronald Reagan’s presidential victory in November 1980, Kagan, who was then a student at Princeton University, contributed a piece to the Daily Princetonian, wherein she gave voice to her angst over the apparent demise of the left. She wrote that her immediate “gut response” to Reagan's election had been to conclude “that the world had gone mad, that liberalism was dead, and that there was no longer any place for the ideals we held or the beliefs we espoused.” Soon thereafter Kagan predicted, with a hopeful spirit, that “the next few years will be marked by American disillusionment with conservative programs and solutions, and that a new, revitalized, perhaps more leftist left will once again come to the fore.”

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2398

14 posted on 05/13/2010 10:06:37 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Speaking of left-wing radicalism during the 80s:

Obama Espoused Radical Views in College [advocated revolution]
Steve Malzberg - WOR News Talk Radio 710 ^ | February 12, 2010 | Ronald Kessler

Posted on Friday, February 12, 2010 7:33:56 PM by ETL

Dr. John C. Drew, a grant writing consultant in Laguna Niguel, Calif., tells Newsmax he met Obama in 1980 when Obama was a sophomore at Occidental College in Los Angeles. Drew had just graduated from Occidental and was attending graduate school at Cornell University.

During Christmas break, Drew says he was at Grauman-Boss’ home in Palo Alto when Obama came over with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, his roommate from Pakistan.

“Barack [Obama] and Hasan showed up at the house in a BMW, and then we went to a restaurant together,” Drew says. “We had a nice meal, and then we came back to the house and smoked cigarettes and drank and argued politics.”

For the next several hours, they discussed Marxism.

He [Obama] was arguing a straightforward Marxist-Leninist class-struggle point of view, which anticipated that there would be a revolution of the working class, led by revolutionaries, who would overthrow the capitalist system and institute a new socialist government that would redistribute the wealth,” says Drew, who says he himself was then a Marxist.

The idea was basically that wealthy people were exploiting others,” Drew says. “That this was the secret of their wealth, that they weren’t paying others enough for their work, and they were using and taking advantage of other people. He was convinced that a revolution would take place, and it would be a good thing.”

Drew concluded that Obama thought of himself as “part of an intelligent, radical vanguard that was leading the way towards this revolution and towards this new society.” ..."

Referring to Obama’s quote from “Dreams of My Father” that he associated with Marxist professors, Drew says, “What he’s not saying is that he was in 100 percent total agreement with those Marxist professors. When you understand that, Obama’s later associations and policies make more sense, including why he was taken in by Rev. Wright’s ideology.”

15 posted on 05/13/2010 10:15:05 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ETL

He was convinced that a revolution would take place, and it would be a good thing.
___________________________
He should be careful what he wishes for because if one ever does take place, he better run for the hills. I would venture to guess he doesn’t wish for one now. No way does he want to give up his new lifestyle. After all MO said it was cool not having to do laundry, cook, go to the grocery store, and having all those ... “servants”. Yep, she likes her servants that do everything for her. Pigs, both of them. Elitist pinko pigs.


16 posted on 05/13/2010 10:31:10 AM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
I would venture to guess he doesn’t wish for one now [communist revolution].

There's no need for one now. They've achieved what they wanted without firing a shot.

17 posted on 05/13/2010 10:37:37 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: day21221

Sucky sucky


18 posted on 05/13/2010 10:49:01 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

FOX is a liberl news outlet that likes to pay some lip service to conservatism.


19 posted on 05/13/2010 11:32:17 AM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity have their own platforms and are hardly liberals, yet I have heard nothing from them regarding Kagan’s socialist views.


20 posted on 05/13/2010 11:58:28 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

“Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness.”

Uh, Americans don’t speak of socialism’s greatness because it’s failed everywhere it’s been tried.

And she is supposed to be edjumacted?


21 posted on 05/13/2010 12:37:10 PM PDT by rickb308 (Muslims need to check with Native Americans & ask how that whole cowboys & indians thing worked out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: day21221

If we bork her, we could get worse. The good thing about her is that she hired conservative professors at Harvard. That is somebody who is not a wacko.


22 posted on 05/13/2010 12:59:48 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson