Uh, no, I don't think that was the premise of the post at all.
I'm sure you've heard the claim that the chances of life occurring without intelligent intervention (i.e. God) is less than (or the same as depending on who is making the statement) some number of monkeys typing the complete works of Shakespear.
Whether the author agrees with that or not, I believe he is just investigating the statistical probability of a monkey (or monkeys) being able to do so.
Had I read it, maybe I wouldn’t have replied as I did.
Read my #8.
The monkeys would succeed 100% of the time if the output comes out encrypted. The question is not if monkeys could type out Shakespeare, but what is the statistical probability we could decrypt their output, or even prove it's not encrypted Shakespeare?