Posted on 06/10/2010 9:24:21 AM PDT by pissant
The claim comes from a Stormfront-sponsored program, and the original video has Stormfront logos all over it. What more evidence do you need?
Uh huh.
The unfolded
COLB
scan???????????
Who the hell gets elected President with a scan for God’s sakes ........?????????
There are dozens of reasonable explanations. But if you are an Obama troll, you won’t see it that way.
As articulate as ever, pissy.
The unfolded
COLB
scan???????????
Who the hell gets elected President with a scan for God’s sakes ........?????????
What’s so hard about just reaching in your pocket and pulling out a sheet of paper?
Can anyone answer me this???
Secondly, the announcement doesn't say the baby was born in Hawaii, it's just an announcement that any proud new Grandparent might place.
Have you ever shown yours as ID?
Good.
You should read up on the threads about this on FR. Sheesh.
I wonder if Wallop had another screen name before his current signup date.
None of O’s paper trail is public. Not his school records, not his passport records, not his original BC. What records there are have pages missing. I have no idea what he is hiding. But that he is hiding something is plain.
You can’t blame people for trying to imagine what, exactly, it is he is hiding.
Yeah, right, that’s reasonable.
Joe Kovacs discusses in depth his 2 hr long interview of Adams & all the background investigation Kovacs did before interviewing Adams to verify the guy was legit.
Peter Boyles: 8AM hour:
http://www.khow.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=fullshow_boyles.xml
Great!
I wish this were up at the top of this thread, for all to see.
Wonder if anyone will reply to my scan question?
...A birth announcement was printed in the newspaper for crying out loud....
An announcement could be printed if someone applied for a BC even if Obama was not born in a hospital...
Also check this out concerning the “birth announcements”
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/
Good!
“World Net Daily is far from reliable”
Try “not even close to unreliable.”
They throw nearly EVERYTHING they see and hear into one, big pot, without corroborating evidence, and then ignore the consequences when they get it wrong.
WND is in it for the moolah and these past experiences should make you think twice about automatically giving WND the benefit of the doubt:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2531005/posts?page=43#43
I’m sure of that.
I think it would be hilarious if the National Enquirer or other tabloid suddenly broke FULL and COMPLETE DETAILS of the OBAMA FRAUD for every supermarket patron to read.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.