Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Penna Atty Geníl has jurisdiction to call Sestak Grand Jury
Liberty Pundits ^ | June 15, 2010 | Clyde Middleton

Posted on 06/15/2010 4:48:20 AM PDT by clyde_m

In a reapportionment case, Erfer v. Com. (794 A.2d 325 (2002)), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania specifically held that the Commonwealth retained jurisdiction over all elections within the state, not just those for state office. Further, when discussing equal protection under the Pennsylvania Constitution, the court held, “The issue is whether the reapportionment plan has denied voters of a fair chance to influence the political process. This inquiry focuses not on the effects of a single election, but on the election process itself.” I find that instructive: What better argument can be made for denying a voter his or her ability “to influence the political process” than clearing the field of candidates?

(Excerpt) Read more at libertypundits.net ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: clinton; corbett; sestak

1 posted on 06/15/2010 4:48:20 AM PDT by clyde_m
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: clyde_m

Forget judicial activism. What specific PA law was violated by Sestak/Clinton/Rahm/Obama/etal? I don’t know PA law. I’m just asking. But our side would be hypocritical to ask the court to get involved without naming the specific PA law that was broken.

In contrast, it is reasonable to believe a federal law was broken.


2 posted on 06/15/2010 5:19:31 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clyde_m

I’m not sure where a PA AG would have jurisdiction over federal offenses such as violations of the Hatch Act.


3 posted on 06/15/2010 5:26:57 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
From the article:

Further, Section 5 of the Pennsylvania Constitution begins with “Elections shall be free and equal.” How far do we need to take “free and equal” when a 3d party seeks to manipulate the slate of candidates in apparent violation of federal law? If an act has the color of violating federal law, then it doesn’t seem to be a stretch to convene a Grand Jury to investigate whether it violates an on-point Pennsylvania Constitutional provision.

4 posted on 06/15/2010 5:29:31 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: clyde_m

I’m still waiting for someone to tell me why Bill Clinton can offer Sestak a position in the Obama government when he is not part of that government.


5 posted on 06/15/2010 6:38:04 AM PDT by anoldafvet (As of 12/24/2009, no more democrats elected - ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson