Skip to comments.Liberal Brit Journalists, Like American Propagandists, Refuse to Look Past Their Own BS
Posted on 06/15/2010 9:08:16 AM PDT by Starman417
A headline from the British newspaper 'The Economist' reflects the frustration of the British Socialist with the inevitability of Conservatism replacing the latest Socialist Darling to auger into obscurity and ignominy through incompetence and arrogance.
What's wrong with America's right
Too much anger and too few ideas. America needs a better alternative to Barack Obama
At least the Liberal Brit Journalists are able to admit that the Obamanation has been an overwhelming disaster and that a replacement is needed and that time is of the essence: however, admitting that Conservatism is a legitimate alternative is beneath their Leftist ideology. The idea that an antithesis to Obama's incompetence and Chicago Machine type Corruption is a viable alternative by itself, without campaigns of faux Greek columns and fainting women who perform on cue.
Read more at floppingaces.net...
Great conclusion to the article...
Yes, Obama is his own opposition, he is in a constant battle with the failure of Socialism and his own incompetence. The Republicans only need to clean house and offer up Conservative principles in the fall; America has had enough of Obamas Socialism and we dont need insipid British Socialism; Conservative principles will be like a shining beacon marking a harbor for the American ship of state that is perilously close to the Socialist breakers on stormy economic seas.
To the Socialist Brits we say, we have the answer and it is Conservatism.
I saw that cover and swore NEVER to open that publication ever again.
If I wanted to read a children’s magazine, I’ll just wait until I go to the dentist.
British Socialism is NOT insipid. The Labor Party were secretly hand-in-glove with the USSR during the Cold War, and the stories pouring out of the UK both before and after the Brown implosion are horrifying.
Thanks very much for the clarification.