Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How can a constitutionally ineligible, putative president get a four-star general to resign?
Post & Email ^ | June 23, 2010 | Tom Arnold

Posted on 06/24/2010 8:07:16 PM PDT by USALiberty

Mr. Dasey, you tell me how Barack Obama, the putative president and so-called “Commander-in-Chief,” was able to legally and ethically secure the resignation of a four-star general and American hero, Stanley McChrystal! Obama has no legal or moral authority to do any such thing! Barack Obama (assuming that’s his real name) is not, as our Constitution defines it and requires, a “natural born citizen”! I don’t care if he looks “black” (he’s mostly Arabic in ethnicity, and he has admitted to being a Muslim as opposed to Christian).

I don’t care if the people elected him “President,” as it was by fraud. He never possessed the qualifications to run for office in the first place, yet he lied and claimed that he did. That alone makes him guilty of high crimes, including treason. I don’t care if the man is charismatic; so were Adolf Hitler and Jim Jones! I don’t care if there’s a conspiracy of “heavyweights” like George Soros, Rupert Murdoch, Michael Moore, the Clintons, John McCain and Sarah Palin, O’Reilly, Beck and others to keep him in office. I don’t care if he has numerous social security numbers while most of us ordinary folks are restricted to having only one. I don’t care if he, Obama, knows who I am, because I am just an ordinary everyday American citizen.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; dasey; kenyanusurper; mcchrystal; naturalborncitizen; obama; treason
This letter raises EXCELLENT QUESTIONS!
1 posted on 06/24/2010 8:07:19 PM PDT by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

General McChrystal demonstrated military discipline and deference to the office when he tendered his resignation to the Commander-in-Chief.


2 posted on 06/24/2010 8:09:47 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Because the general is a libtard pu*s, the Joint Cheifs are filled with libs or cowards like the CIA and Pentagon plus SCOTUS. The judicary and legislative branches are totally corrupt. Prepare for islamification too.

Most Americans are idiots who watch TV which empowers the Saudi agent. TV is 100% behind him.


3 posted on 06/24/2010 8:12:09 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

How? By being elected President. The only way.


4 posted on 06/24/2010 8:13:32 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; ExTexasRedhead; Sparko; trlambsr; True Republican Patriot; 3IDVET; STARWISE; Lumper20; ...

Ping!


5 posted on 06/24/2010 8:19:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

bump


6 posted on 06/24/2010 8:20:19 PM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Because the general is a libtard pu*s

How much time do you have in Ranger Battalion?

7 posted on 06/24/2010 8:21:03 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
General McChrystal demonstrated military discipline and deference to the office when he tendered his resignation to the Commander-in-Chief.

Yah right.

If McChrystal had any balls whatsoever, his first allegiance is to uphold & defend the Constitution of the United States, from all enemies both foreign & domestic. His allegiance is NOT to the Commander in Chief, or in 0b0z0's case, the Usurper-in-Crap. McChrystal should have demanded that 0b0z0 prove by what right, that he could fire or demand McChrystal's resignation, and force a Constitutional crisis RIGHT THEN & THERE to force 0b0z0 to prove his constitutional eligibility as president. McChrystal is a stinkin' RAT bastard socialist demoRAT liberal whose real allegiance will always be to the leftist agenda & ideology.

8 posted on 06/24/2010 8:21:14 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”


9 posted on 06/24/2010 8:24:12 PM PDT by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcrngroup

McChrystal exhibited poor judgement when he voted for the usurper...so his secondary screw-up doesn’t surprise me.


10 posted on 06/24/2010 8:29:15 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rcrngroup

Don’t hold back. Tell us how you really feel.


11 posted on 06/24/2010 8:29:48 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Letter is from “Tom Arnold”?


12 posted on 06/24/2010 8:31:50 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
"...he’s mostly Arabic in ethnicity..."

I keep seeing this claim, but I've seen his daddy, and he's as negroid as any other African.

Where's the alleged Arab in the woodpile?

13 posted on 06/24/2010 8:35:18 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
It seems that Rolling Stone Magazine is now in charge of our foreign policy with Barry at the helm.
14 posted on 06/24/2010 8:36:52 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
About the same time I have covering for a Saudi agent usurper. Zero.

How much time does he, the JCOS, CIA, DIA, NSA, SCOTUS have covering for the usurper? Almost 2 years?

I have more respect for LTC Lakin but those who were butt kissers to the brass and who loved the PX for cheap smokes and booze think Lakin should be court martialed.

15 posted on 06/24/2010 8:40:58 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

In all the pictures I’ve seen of McChrystal, he’s wearing 3 stars.


16 posted on 06/24/2010 8:45:02 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (Time for a new tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcrngroup

If he had an IQ above 4 he would never have voted for the Saudi agent. He knows that Riyad aka the King wants his employee in the white hut to get lots of american troops killed with pro-muslim rules of engagement.

Iraq and Afghan now are all about getting american troops killed and humiliating the US military.

McChrystal VOTED for that.

The govt now is filled with Muslim Brotherhood moles [robably sending intel back to the Taliban and Al Queada to kill our troops.

McChrystal VOTED for that. F-— him.


17 posted on 06/24/2010 8:46:16 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Thanks! LOL!

But just to reiterate, McChrystal is a socialist RAT bastard liberal demoRAT through & through. He had a golden opportunity to force disclosure of 0b0z0's illegitimate, illegal, unconstitutional election as pres___ent of the U.S. And he did nothing. McChrystal is a coward & traitor along with 0b0z0, the commie pig, usurper-in-crap. If Petraeus had any balls he would likewise decline the "offer" and explain to the American people why he was not taking the assignment. I think 90% of the generals & admirals currently on active duty are dyed-in-the-wool socialist RAT bastard liberal demoRATS.

18 posted on 06/24/2010 8:52:20 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

If the general wanted the job he wouldn’t have given the magazine interview. He got what he wanted: out of a losing command.


19 posted on 06/24/2010 8:57:56 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Ever notice in the past 2 decades that when those with the least qualifications and most suspicion of criminal behavior are liberals in office, those closest to institutions of clandestine intelligence and operations with power to confirm and act are removed from authority?

One of the first things military operational officers learn is to never trust what you read in the press.

I found the Rolling Stone article interesting in that it praised Hillary, asserted the General voted for Obama, then brandished nonprofessional quips attributed to his aides.

I really don’t know how anybody would know who the General voted for in a sealed ballot, even if he claimed to vote for somebody, let alone report it as fact.

I don’t know why an article would praise Hillary in that relationship, unless to damage the General’s military reputation and image of righteousness or just discernment amongst his peers and juniors or perhaps simple lip service.

For the rest of the article it appeared to well document the General’s devotion to duty to a chain of command which might have provided considerably more support.

IMHO, from reviewing his bio and timeline, he was probably selected and groomed for this type of position for decades and did not in any shape, form, or fashion receive it based upon competitive excellence, but that is simply the evidence, not a judgment of authority.

IMHO, none involved in the situation have manifest any virtue in their discernment or actions, but they have been authoritatively active in a worldly manner.

I’m left with the impression that two seasoned, groomed professional senior flag ranked officers have held the same position, and have received more adversarial support from the political authority, than any friendly active support in the accomplishment of a visceral mission.

Those who repetitively blame their juniors, rarely if ever respect their seniors.

The removal IMHO paints Obama more as a loser than a winner, but I don’t know why the action occurred, because the obvious events being reported are too easily contrived in either direction for the political maneuvering of others.


20 posted on 06/24/2010 9:04:49 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“...he’s mostly Arabic in ethnicity...”
I keep seeing this claim, but I’ve seen his daddy,

I know, I’ve seen this posted over and over again, but I can’t find anything to support it. IF BO Sr is his father, we’ve seen his pictures, there’snothing Arab about his appeparance. If BO Sr ISN’T his father (Frank Marshall Davis or Malclom X) either of them is American, so again, the Arab thing doesn’t apply. This is just a distraction.


21 posted on 06/24/2010 9:22:29 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

You’re all falling for the political theatre, SMC is a member of the Soros conspiracy. The usurper said “I need a distraction, fall on your sword Stanley”, and so he did.


22 posted on 06/24/2010 10:33:08 PM PDT by 83Vet4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick
IF BO Sr is his father, we’ve seen his pictures, there’s nothing Arab about his appearance.

Honestly, I don't remember when the Arab theory of his provenance started, but once it did, it grew legs and took off.

Obama Sr. was a black African who was more Communist than Muslim. Zero's middle name is Hussein, which I suppose is Arabic, but lots of other Kenyans have that name. They're not Arabs, but most are Muslim.

Dunno. Maybe that's where it started.

23 posted on 06/24/2010 11:03:14 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

Yet

Both his names, without a doubt, are of Arabic NOT African origin

Barack

Hussein

Wonder why?

and he lied when he said they were Swahili

Wonder why ....

The “father” met Barack for 10 minutes in 30 years, had that one photo taken .,........ something odd and weird about the whole thing (no wedding record ever found, never living together even for a single day)

Weird


24 posted on 06/25/2010 2:39:33 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 83Vet4Life

The usurper said “I need a distraction, fall on your sword Stanley”

I thought Stanley was his Mom


25 posted on 06/25/2010 2:40:30 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

At one time, I was dismissive of this theory. But as each day brings another egregious act against the health, safety, and welfare of this country, I can’t help but deduce that the Kenyan clown despises this country and all it has stood for. Before the election, I knew that he embraced Black liberation theology and Marxism. But it goes even further than that. It’s a mixture of Islamic hatred toward the west, combined with requiring reparations from Whitey for past oppression against the Black man, combined with Marxism. This toxic philosophical stew is fatal to the country.


26 posted on 06/25/2010 4:40:05 AM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Honestly, I am concerned about any of our military using force overseas. The United Nations will use the ineligibility of their man Obama to knock us around for a while. The left has really screwed us and themselves.


27 posted on 06/25/2010 6:10:11 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Hey, Barack "Hubris" Obama, $10 is all it would take, why spend millions to cover it up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; Hoplite

And how much time do you have in the fiels with the SF?

Stan McCrystal is one of the best GO’s we have. (Had) and it is a shame it has come to this.


28 posted on 06/25/2010 6:27:39 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Frantzie is certifiable.


29 posted on 06/25/2010 7:14:48 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

He voted for the one who is an obvious agent for the Saudis and Indonesia. A person who’s past is a total mystery. Either incredibly poor judgemnent or he is one of them.

Ever hear of the Muslim Brotherhood? Maybe these SF guys need to spend less time running marathons and old books on counter insurgency in Nam. A few articles on National Review by someone like David Pryce-Jones and Mark Steyn might bring him up to speed.

The Pentagon has no clue. Our troops are now and have been for the past 20 months been set up to die and be humiliated by the Saudi agent. This is what the King wants and the Islamic world.

Stan McChrystal VOTED for that.


30 posted on 06/25/2010 7:36:47 AM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I would suggest then that you tell that diretly to the face of one of those SF types and see how long you’re standing thereafter.


31 posted on 06/25/2010 8:02:01 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

McCrystal voted for the one. The one is selling out the troops. Get a clue. They are being punked. Stan McChrystal appears to be one of “them.”


32 posted on 06/25/2010 8:04:26 AM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

“How can a constitutionally ineligible, putative president get a four-star general to resign?”

EVEN IF Obama not the de jure CIC, he is still de facto CIC.

We have had to recognize de facto heads of state.

At least that is how I remember the little International Law that I did study.

In terms of Domestic Law, if Obama were ever to lawfully be found ineligible, I don’t know how that would affect domestic legislation he signed into law.

Unfortunately, chances are that will never happen.

But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t keep trying to shine a little light on the truth which has been buried.

If for no other reason let’s get some laws on the books, state or federal, to make sure this duplicity is never visited upon us again.


33 posted on 06/25/2010 8:04:44 AM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
How can a constitutionally ineligible, putative president get a four-star general to resign?

Apparently without a whole lot of trouble once the four-star in question shoots his mouth off to Rolling Stone.

34 posted on 06/25/2010 8:06:34 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo
"In all the pictures I’ve seen of McChrystal, he’s wearing 3 stars."


35 posted on 06/25/2010 8:08:17 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

You are clearly mistaking politics with Military acumen.

I would follow Stan McCrystal into hell in a combat scenario, as would most.


36 posted on 06/25/2010 8:22:28 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Roger that.


37 posted on 06/25/2010 8:36:41 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray, Pray, Pray. Stop Barrystroika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

Hooah!


38 posted on 06/25/2010 8:46:18 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Maybe you did not notice but you lost your country 20 months ago. Stan voted for it too. He was either clueless or voted for the coup.

I hope the rest of the military is not a dumb as McChrystal.

It is so easy to connect the dots but a lot of major dumb a*ses get their reality through ball games on TV and running marathons. Ball games are moe important than liberty because the morons have no clue. The TV manipulates the masses. Fox News? At least 7% owned by the Saudis.

This is a lot like how the honorable Germany Army got hijacked by SS and SA thugs and an Austrian usurper but this is far far worse.

I hear a lot of people hear blasting LTC Lakin as not following the chain of command and kissing the brasses a**es. Lakin at least read The Constitution that is being shredded. Probably most dudes in the service only care about cheap smokes and booze at the PX.

Our military is being pawned, used and killed off by a Saudi/Indonesia mole that “Stan” voted for.


39 posted on 06/25/2010 9:48:04 AM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I am one of LTC Lakin’s staunchest supporters, so take your trash talk elsewhere.

And I’ll not ever concede My country to the Marxists unil I’m sone-cold F’n dead.


40 posted on 06/25/2010 9:51:36 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Thanks! Obviously I was wrong, or looking at old pictures.


41 posted on 06/25/2010 3:44:52 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (Time for a new tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
How can a constitutionally ineligible, putative president get a four-star general to resign?

Because no one tells this guy ....NO!

42 posted on 06/26/2010 2:18:20 PM PDT by urtax$@work (The best kind of memorial is a Burning Memorial.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson