Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONTAMINATION - Coming Soon to Food Near You - Produced by Nalco Corexit - Directed by Barack Obama
Investigating Obama, American Daughter ^ | 6/24/2010 | Nan Matthis

Posted on 06/24/2010 9:26:31 PM PDT by unspun

by Nancy Matthis at American Daughter

The toxic chemical dispersant Corexit 9500 was pumped into the Gulf to counter the oil spill. Now it appears to have gassified, entered the atmosphere, and rained down on inland farmers, damaging crops and killing songbirds:

One month ago, on May 24, The European Union Times wrote about a report prepared by Russia's Ministry of Natural Resources for President Medvedev -- Toxic Oil Spill Rains Warned Could Destroy North America:

A dire report prepared for President Medvedev by Russia's Ministry of Natural Resources is warning ... that the British Petroleum (BP) oil and gas leak in the Gulf of Mexico is about to become the worst environmental catastrophe in all of human history threatening the entire eastern half of the North American continent with "total destruction".

Russian scientists are basing their apocalyptic destruction assessment due to BP's use of millions of gallons of the chemical dispersal agent known as Corexit 9500 which is being pumped directly into the leak of this wellhead over a mile under the Gulf of Mexico waters and designed, this report says, to keep hidden from the American public the full, and tragic, extent of this leak that is now estimated to be over 2.9 million gallons a day.

The dispersal agent Corexit 9500 is a solvent originally developed by Exxon and now manufactured by the Nalco Holding Company of Naperville, Illinois that is four times more toxic than oil....

A greater danger involving Corexit 9500, and as outlined by Russian scientists in this report, is that with its 2.61ppm toxicity level, and when combined with the heating Gulf of Mexico waters, its molecules will be able to "phase transition" from their present liquid to a gaseous state allowing them to be absorbed into clouds and allowing their release as "toxic rain" upon all of Eastern North America.

Even worse, should a Katrina like tropical hurricane form in the Gulf of Mexico while tens of millions of gallons of Corexit 9500 are sitting on, or near, its surface the resulting "toxic rain" falling upon the North American continent could "theoretically" destroy all microbial life to any depth it reaches resulting in an "unimaginable environmental catastrophe" destroying all life forms from the "bottom of the evolutionary chart to the top"....

By June 10 the San Fransico Chronicle reported crop damage -- BP oil spill Corexit dispersants suspected in widespread crop damage:
....It seems like damage brought by the oil gusher has spread way beyond the ocean, coastal areas and beaches. Collateral damage now appears to include agricultural damage way inland Mississippi.

A mysterious "disease" has caused widespread damage to plants from weeds to farmed organic and conventionally grown crops. There is very strong suspicion that ocean winds have blown Corexit aerosol plumes or droplets and that dispersants have caused the unexplained widespread damage or "disease"....

The warning on the Corexit 9500 label is clear enough:
"Keep container tightly closed. Do not get in eyes, on skin, on clothing. Do not take internally. Avoid breathing vapor. Use with adequate ventilation. In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice. After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of soap and water. Wear suitable protective clothing."
Now the stuff is raining down on us!

Corexit warning label
It has been well-known in the oil industry since the 1980s that oil-eating microbes can clean up the oil with no lasting environmental impact. They were developed at the behest of the Texas Land Office and the Texas Water Commission, and used successfully in 1990 to clean up a large oil spill in Galveston (see Business Insider -- An Oil-Eating Microbe That's Been Around Since 1989 Could Single-Handedly Clean Up BP's Entire Oil Spill).


6/1/2010 video Gulf Oil Spill - Microbes that will eat oil within weeks

So why is Corexit 9500 being used in the Gulf of Mexico? Back on May 30 blogger Jo Anne Moretti published a Bombshell Exposé based on meticulous and lengthy research that she had performed showing that Democrat party bigwigs including Warren Buffett, Maurice Strong, Al Gore, and George Soros reaped huge profits from the sale of Corexit. Not only that, but her findings show that some increased their holdings preceding the disaster:
There is big money and even bigger players in this scam. While they are letting the oil blow wide open into the Gulf, the stakes and profit rise.

The Dolphins, Whales, Manatees, Sea Turtles and fish suffocate and die. The coastal regions, salt marshes, tourist attractions and the shore front properties are being destroyed, possibly permanently. The air quality is diminished. The Gulf of Mexico fishing industry is decimated.

All to create a need for their expensive and extremely profitable poison.

By now an outraged public has become aware of the microbes, which were warehoused in large quantities and available for use in the Gulf. But it is too late to use them now that Corexit has depleted the oxygen in the water. The microbes need oxygen to live long enough to eat the oil.

The European Union Times report sums it up best:

...the greatest lesson to be learned by these Americans is that their government-oil industry cabal has been just as destructive to them as their government-banking one, both of which have done more to destroy the United States these past couple of years than any foreign enemy could dare dream was possible.

But to their greatest enemy the Americans need look no further than their nearest mirror as they are the ones who allowed these monsters to rule over them in the first place.

H/T: Serg N of Common Sense Patriots Related reading:

JoAnneMor -- Bombshell exposé. The real reason the oil still flows into the Gulf of Mexico.

[Note: Jo Anne Mor represents the best of the Blogosphere, an ordinary blogger whose dedicated work uncovers hidden evils that endanger us and makes them public knowledge.]

The Next Right -- BP's strange Democrat bedfellows

One of the top media consultants for British Petroleum gave free rent to a politician who became White House Chief of Staff. And, no, this was not Karl Rove giving a freebie to Andy Card. No, the recipient of the favor was Rahm Emanuel and the benefactor was Stanley Greenberg....
© Nancy Matthis, all rights reserved, published with permission.


TOPICS: Agriculture; Food; Gardening; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: corexit; crimeinc; deathbystarvation; famine; food; hunger; obama; signsofthetimes; starvation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: unspun; xzins; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; 1000 silverlings; Gamecock; Alex Murphy; Quix; RnMomof7
Unbelievable.

We're being played, but it's just not clear who's doing the playing.

21 posted on 06/24/2010 10:56:28 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Ros<P>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

hmmmm i WONDERED about that.

THX.


22 posted on 06/24/2010 11:11:32 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

THESE FOLKS, this little club . . .

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2

HAVE BEEN playing the American citizens for fools and like a piano for 110 and more years.

Beyond that, I’m not sure who you’re considering.


23 posted on 06/24/2010 11:12:53 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

And they really are quite deadly serious about forcably exterminating the world population down to 200 million.


24 posted on 06/24/2010 11:18:05 PM PDT by Quix (THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: unspun

I’m right on the Miss coast. Best year ever for my lawn and garden. Absolutely lush and green. Lots of birds and insects. More songbirds than usual because of the great conditions this year. About the only thing good happening this year.


25 posted on 06/24/2010 11:29:48 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

...”Unbelievable.
We’re being played, but it’s just not clear who’s doing the playing”...

My first thoughts after reading this was what I heard Glen Beck say the other day..He admonished to watch for drastic moves by this administration because of the falling poll numbers..Part of that plan might be to scare this population into submission with something beyond the failed global warming push of the past few years. While we need to protect our planet the best we can, we also need to understand that there are those very, very rich people out there, some not even citizens of our own nation, who would be happy to form an unholy alliance to take over the whole world. What do you do when you are totally bored with all the material wealth money can buy?..Why, you try to dominate and enslave the human spirit out of your envy of God. We are in very dangerous times and not primarily from the oil spill. As always, it is human evil which will get us in the end.


26 posted on 06/25/2010 12:49:17 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kingu
2.5 million liters is 15,724 barrels, as in barrels used to measure oil. That is the total release (according to reports) of the dispersant over the lifetime of the spill. This is compared to roughly 19,000 barrels of crude oil spilling from the Deepwater wildcat well head per day.

I know this is going far, far out on a limb here, but somehow I think that 50 times the volume of crude oil is going to pretty much negate the minuscule risk as listed in the material safety sheet you posted for handling the fully concentrated form of dispersant.

Reasonable observation. However, the Corexit is separating the oil into its constituent parts, harming both the ocean and the air. It acts like a poor refinery. Instead of crude oil that rises and cane be skimmed off the top of the sea, one gets, the various chemicals such as pentane, heptane, octane, etc. More stays down in the various levels of the sea and (perhaps) more some rises into the air.

According to a great many experts, this Corexit path is doing much more harm than good, compared to other options.

Consider this an alert about the possibility of big problems in the air/rain. Big problems in the sea are a given, and have been guaranteed to be much, much worse than had the massive skimming, suction, absorption, and bacteriological digestion methods that people from all over the world have been trying to get Obama administration to adopt.

27 posted on 06/25/2010 1:26:02 AM PDT by unspun (It's individual, state & national sovereignties, 'stupid' - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Habibi
..therefore it would take quite a while for it to evaporate significantly.

It is being dispersed into oil which is lighter then water and eventually floats up to the surface in slicks.

28 posted on 06/25/2010 1:30:54 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: unspun
Consider this an alert about the possibility of big problems in the air/rain.

At the very least they have decided to pursue a path that minimizes short term negatives (visible oil slicks). This is accomplished by maximizing the long term negatives (corexit fallout). Looks like they are only worried about the effects this spill has on the upcoming November elections.

29 posted on 06/25/2010 1:40:41 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

I do believe you are right. This dispersant is used solely for show and tell, questionable people are making a huge profit at the risk of millions living near the Gulf.

I really honestly hate saying this and I do deserve any criticism but I am again truly glad I live in Alaska.

Too cold and remote for politicians to majorly screw up.


30 posted on 06/25/2010 2:39:40 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Every move was made by the DNC and Obama and BP

for the cap and trade patent (held by the DNC)
for Soros and Petrobras
against the American people, their children and future.


31 posted on 06/25/2010 2:52:01 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun

bump


32 posted on 06/25/2010 4:18:25 AM PDT by tutstar (Baptist Ping List-freepmail me to be included or removed. <{{{><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Gulf of Mexico is now The Obama Dead Sea.


33 posted on 06/25/2010 4:22:16 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

“It is being dispersed into oil which is lighter then water and eventually floats up to the surface in slicks.”

Well, it rather depends on what the Corexit is doing to the oil. There’s a nifty site that discusses Corexit, and how it works, which might interest you.

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6578

Now mind you,this site has a mix of academics and practitioners, which always leads to interesting discussions. Such conversations also tend to cut through the media driven BS that all too often clouds the reality of environmental problems. Transparency can be really refreshing.

I’ll warn you that some of this stuff will make your eyes cross, and reflects some uncerainty on the part of the tech community. That’s ok though, as knowing what we don’t know helps to target the enquiry. The particular variety of Conexit used in the Gulf is a bit light in the formulation area. It is reputed to have some strong surfactants (detergents), but that needs to be elaborated on before a real discussion can proceed on it. I’m sure the formulation will become available, but from the literature I was able to acquire, some of the contents are still proprietary.

If the surfactant effect is significant, it’s going to be putting a lot of this oil into solution, much as the cooking oils in your kitchen sink. That would tend to keep the oil away form the surface in the first place.

Like most natural/unnatural systems, the variables can confound those seeking easy answers. Be very careful about buying into simple environmental theories about the situation at an early stage. Right now, the Ludite environmental opportunists are regurgitating whatever comes into their technically feeble brains. For good or ill, accurate environmental answers are not going to come for a long time. Right now you’re seeing PC-PR spin thats only produced by organizations trying to push particular agendas that have little to do with reality. In months, or years, we’ll actually know some of the answers as to how Corexit works in this particular environment. Those who profess to know the answers at this early stage are not to be trusted, but it is interesting to pick apart their agenda driven mantras that are trying to pass off as scientific knowledge.


34 posted on 06/25/2010 6:22:11 AM PDT by Habibi ("It is vain to do with more what can be done with less." - William of Occam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

Been to the Oil Drum. Just too busy to read all the threads that deal with this spill. And yes the various political groups will be coming to the situation from their perspectives. At any rate, since the formulation is proprietary, we can only guess at this point in time.


35 posted on 06/25/2010 6:59:11 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Habibi

A ping to you...

I quoted your No. 34 post via my 22 here...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2541314/posts?page=1


36 posted on 06/25/2010 7:59:06 AM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: unspun

So now FR is going to quote “russian government sources” and pretend they are fact-based?

Corexit is not an evaporative agent, it biodegrades, it isn’t getting into the atmosphere, even when sprayed from above it has a very low travel distance (about 2000 feet in a 30 mph wind).

It’s also not all that toxic, it is made up materials all of which you can find in common household products, including cleaners and body lotions.

And they haven’t sprayed enough that it could, if dispersed, spread enough to cause widespread disaster, even it it was actually highly toxic AND could be evaporated and didn’t biodegrade.

FR is just being too inundated with all this crap from the environmentalist whacko movement. We might as well become shills for cap and trade.


37 posted on 06/25/2010 8:43:57 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
I'm especially amused by the warning label:

"Keep container tightly closed. Do not get in eyes, on skin, on clothing. Do not take internally. Avoid breathing vapor. Use with adequate ventilation. In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice. After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of soap and water. Wear suitable protective clothing."

Have you looked at the warning label on the products you have around the house?

If a product doesn't tell you to do a 15-minute rinse and seek medical advice for skin contact, it's not really hazardous. You'll find this warning on your formula 409 that you spray all over your kitchen.

You should see the warning on the chlorine bottle they pour into the pool you swim in every day.


38 posted on 06/25/2010 8:46:46 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unspun
BP chose more toxic, less effective oil dispersant manufactured by company …

They didn't. The EPA asked them about this, and BP responded, and the EPA agreed with the response.

39 posted on 06/25/2010 8:47:37 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
Heck, pool chemical labels are downright frightening to read.

Yep, and yet we actually SWIM in those chemicals.

40 posted on 06/25/2010 8:49:42 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson