Skip to comments.BREAKING! God Now Censored From Blogs
Posted on 07/24/2010 5:45:43 PM PDT by ranair34
The One has made His intentions known to control the internet, along with Amerika itself. His administration has been been attempting (ofttimes succeeding) to censor and silence writers including this one, working to block me from getting news releases out to various media sites. Persecution and censorship of writers has begun.
However, this one takes the ultimate censorship cake. . According to the Communist News site, Peoples World, a new internet software blocker titled, GodBlock is now up and running. Its purpose, according to its designers, Is to test each page that your child visits before it is loaded, looking for passages from holy texts, names of religious figures, and other signs of religious propaganda. If none are found, then your child is allowed to browse freely.
Obamas Marxist implementors have argued that children need to be protected from some of the truly horrifying imagery in the religious texts. Penn Jillette (a most disgusting vulger blasphemous man), of the comedy-magic duo Penn and Teller, said of GodBlock via Twitter, Finally some software to help your children avoid dangerous crazy violent sick sh*t that we have proof does real damage. Really!
David Silverman, national spokesperson and vice presdent of American Atheists, told the Peoples Word that, There are some disgusting things in the Bible. Theyre talking about smashing babies against the rocks, talking about drinking urine and eating dung. Theres really horrible stuff: the genocide, of course, the hate, its all in there. The whole process of killing people because theyre different-suffer not a witch to live - that stuff. Mr. Silverman, please provide us chapter and verse.
He goes on to say that extreme right-wing Christians have often tried to ban things they found offensive, and mentioned how New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani tried to shutter the Brooklyn Museum because of a controversial art work.....hold on there...that art work was a Crucifix with Christ submerged in urine! This was an unacceptable slam on the religion of a majority of the people of the world, as well as their culture which is dear to their hearts. So this was not merely offensive, it was an out and out attack on people of faith.
Supporters of GodBlock, which includes the Obama Administration and the Communists who gloat that they have already taken over America, say that the program is necessary to shield kids from information that will lead them into organized religion. Even children raised in a secular household, says GodBlock.com, are vulnerable to content on the web. This new blocking software has ONLY STARTED under the deception that it protects kids. Their goal is to have this software become hardware that will control every word that goes out on the internet. All references to God as well as any and all Scripture passages will be blocked from ever being seen again. The kids are the starting point only. The intent is to block God from the entire population.
And notice the Communist inspired logo of Godblock. As you examine it you see an image in the center which can be seen clearly as the Marxist trademark, the Hammer & Cycle. The American people and the churches have become so impotent that the Stalinists dont even bother to try and hide their true identity or intent. Sleep well America.....or....get up and on your feet...for Gods Sake!
Dare I say: “How Hitlerian.”
Is this software that you have to purchase to use on your own computer? Why should we Christians have to worry about it? We just don’t have to buy it.
I really hope this isn’t real.
Oh, and by the way, it’s hammer and SICKLE, not hammer and CYCLE. (as in biCYCLE.)
I’m not trying to be a jerk about improper spelling, but, if you’re writing an article.... ;)
No kidding. We’ll just call it an atheist blocker and plot our galactic takeover secure in the knowledge that we aren’t being spied upon.
Absent any transcendent material moral authority, which the Bible supremely is, atheism can easily justify whatever furthers its goals. Just ask Mao, Pol Pot, etc.
God will not be blocked.
Saw Penn on his Maher knockoff about a month ago, of course his standard panel question "Who's an atheist?". And three of them shot up their hand and started ranting BUT Martin Mull said he had gone very recently from atheist to agnostic, and also went on to describe how he had replaced doubt with some rudimentary formative beliefs in a higher power. And the three were stuned beeber style.
“David Icke And Others On Creating Deliberate Economic Collapse”
Wednesday, 21 July 2010
Would it be too much to ask for a link citing who said that quote? Forgive my skepticism, but I find it hard to believe that any president's administration would make such a statement.
Does the author have proof that the Administration supports or endorses this product? I don't see it in the article.
Now that is the best post I've seen in a long time.
What the f are you doing? The Godblock site is all proxied up (surprise, surprise). It doesn’t hold the logo you’re blathering about, a disgusting logo, yes, but not the CPUSA.
It looks like a hoax of some kind, quite likely done up by one or more of the critters mentioned in the original blog - the blogger himself or/and that linked reverend. In any case, I just grabbed the whole bunch of crazies and dumped them in here: http://www.junipersec.com
Does it come in chocolate?
This is likely derived due to Him being the 1st Pres. to honor atheists with a special meeting. Would not go well much earlier. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2460369/posts
Might want to check the spelling on that there magazine cover.
Just don’t buy the software.
Can’t claim it.
Wish there’d been a space after ‘we’ though.
The author of this article is either a moron or trolling for morons.
1. This is a product created by private citizens for use by private citizens who choose to use it. It is not being forced on anybody, nor does it doesn’t prevent anyone from writing about God; it simply allows insecure chumps to configure their browsers so they can only read things they agree with. It’s stupid and cowardly, and ultimately going to cause these atheists to lose arguments due to self-inflicted ignorance of opposing viewpoints, but it’s still their liberty to take.
2. Where’s the proof that the Obama administration endorses this or any similar product?
Please, don’t give legitimacy to the claim that Christians have a persecution complex.
This appears to be a private project not associated with the federal government. I do not like or support Obama, but this has nothing to do with him.
I’m confused as to how a private software internet site blocker, that a (misguided, but freely entitled) atheist wants to put on his/her computer is somehow connected to Obama.
The hysterical and misleading title just takes away the real horrors that Obama is doing daily by displaying false connections.
That’s a nice idea, and it may start out that way. But remember Obama’s administration is also pushing hard for the government to take over the internet. If they do this, they could require all ISPs to install this (as software or as hardware) into their networks on the backbones. This would mean it would filter literally ALL traffic on the internet.
But that’s how oppressive regimes generally operate, and is how the liberals have been operating for years - piece-meal. Little by little, so no one realizes what they’ve lost until it’s far to late to get it back.
Not when it would censor his endorsements by Reverend Wright and Reverend Jackson. He has no problem with religion when it helps justify his edicts or worships him.
Is the Asian guy the first political prisoner? Or would that be Blabbo Blago?
The smartest hackers don't work for the government. They'd find a say around something like this in a New York Minute! ;o)
Gee, how about the word “Allah”? Are they gonna block that too?
Yeah, go after the Christians, but better leave the Muzzies alone.
Lol. It is mentioned on the People’s World site, which is owned by the CPUSA. So far, so good. The only problem is that there’s no hammer and sickle (not even a hammer and cycle), and that the article - by Dan Margolis - is making the point that nobody likes this thing, not even the atheists.
Austin Miles has a persecution complex.
So, you’re saying it’s basically something any 14 year old can get around? I hardly think God will be blocked (or mocked).
I notice that the posts defending oBummer is by memebers signed up since he became pres_ent
Show me your proof that oBummer is actually involved here, and then we’ll talk.
can you prove he isn’t?
I learned that from the liberals
The article is actually title “GodBlock inspires controversy—among atheists.” So it's an article, in the CPUSA press, discussing a new piece of software's controversial nature. Everything that's posted above as something from the Communist Party is actually from the GodBlock website, and, further, if you actually read the article, the spokesperson for the American Atheists is against the software, saying it impinges upon the freedom of information of everyone, even children.
From the post above, you get the impression that the CPUSA is trumpeting software, with the support of atheists, created by the Obama administration to stifle the religious. From the actual article, you read a news story about a controversy among atheists. How does the latter get translated into the former? The left says the the right wing are all liars; why are you playing into that? Are you secretly a shill for the Democratic Party? How would you feel if the lies you peddled were picked up by the news media, and then everyone had to backtrack when the actual article was found?
Also, if you read the comments, a lot of the atheists seem to think that the software is fake, a joke.
Really, if you're going to post about something, you should be truthful and not willfully twist the facts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.