Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stanley Ann's passport records out
A place to ask questions to get the right answers ^ | July 31, 2010 | Apuzzo

Posted on 07/31/2010 6:25:47 PM PDT by jdirt

They don't have her records before 1965 !!

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Gardening
KEYWORDS: anndunham; birthers; certifigate; dunham; dunhampassport; foreigners; naturalborncitizen; obama; passport; sadopassport; sadpassport; soetoro; soetoropassport; stanleyanndunham; tpd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 501-550551-600601-650651-664 next last
To: Brytani; Buckhead

C’mon in Buckhead ... we need ya, Buddy ... bad ... ;)


551 posted on 08/02/2010 9:51:18 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thanks for that link.

The plot thickens.

Also, it looks like the whole damn family were congenital liars!

The apple has not fallen far from the tree!!


552 posted on 08/02/2010 9:53:30 PM PDT by Palladin (Obama on The View: "When those folks came over on 9-11". Folks??? WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith; Las Vegas Ron; Mr Rogers; little jeremiah; STARWISE; danamco; STE=Q
Throwing a tantrum, whining, pouting, and posting insults,and belittling remarks laced with juvenile sexual innuendo because he cannot just deal with the hand he has been dealt.

You need to grow up!

This evening I saw on Greta that Sarah Palin says that your friend, the illegal alien and usurper in the W.H. has NO cojones!!!

Maybe she should have addressed you instead???

553 posted on 08/02/2010 9:54:34 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Brytani; Buckhead; STARWISE
Buckhead, you made your most recent post dated August 1, 2010, so you will probably see this...

BUCKHEAD WE NEED YOU!

554 posted on 08/02/2010 9:55:02 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

You wouldn’t like it, it’s been hot, muggy, steamy weather for the last couple of weeks.


555 posted on 08/02/2010 9:59:59 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

556 posted on 08/02/2010 10:00:56 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Brytani

557 posted on 08/02/2010 10:08:36 PM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

LOL ... no different than the Midwest lately.
Several high humidity, high 90’s spells.
And Caesar’s is well air conditioned ... ;)

(I LOVE Las Vegas ... I need a ship
to come in so I can take advantage of
the free 4-day stay ticket sitting on
my desk ;)


558 posted on 08/02/2010 10:12:29 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

Comment #559 Removed by Moderator

To: Natural Born 54; Buckhead

Excellent !


560 posted on 08/02/2010 10:16:23 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: Natural Born 54

And swiped .. ;)


561 posted on 08/02/2010 10:19:35 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Natural Born 54; Buckhead

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35189898/Lolo-Soetoro-U-S-Records-Allen-v-DHS-State-and-Allen-v-USCIS-FOIA-Releases-Final-7-29-10

The letter referrenced in the Comment section on the Post& E-Mail article is at this link:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35189898/Lolo-Soetoro-U-S-Records-Allen-v-DHS-State-and-Allen-v-USCIS-FOIA-Releases-Final-7-29-10

ADDRESSED TO MR O’SHEA, 1 MAY, 1974


562 posted on 08/02/2010 10:31:08 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Irony: An immigrant telling ME about illegals. Welcome to America Dan. My Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandfather, immigrated to America in 1747. Our family has been here ever since and fought in EVERY war to protect this nation from 1776 on, and I am a proud DAR.

You need to learn how to read and not how to spout off in utter ignorance. The American way of debate is taken from Isaiah 1:18 “Come now, let us reason together.” It is the rest of the world that resorts to vile, vulgar and slanderous innuendos instead of logic, dispassion and reason.

That you would attack someone with whom you have never constructed a dialog is beneath dignity of civil response, yet I afford it on your behalf, of my own charity.

Let us now address your curt and insulting remarks: Cojones, (n) Spanish vulgarity for testicles. You would be right, I have none. I am a woman. You may wish to check into that situation outside of this conversation if you are confused as to the differences.

“my friend”.... Whom? Barack Husien Obama? Likely, English is not your primary language or else reading and comprehension are less than your strongest gifts. Any of even the slightest perusal of my postings, would hardly leave any such evidence. To the contrary and to be clear, in case you are in fact ignorant and not willfully stupid, BHO is the understudy for the Anti-Christ. That statement alone, should declare plainly my position on the matter. Even for the daft.

Sarah has addressed me. By my first name. In person. And at length. I know her, and her circle of friends. And have had more than one occasion in which to enter into discourse with her personally and will likely do so on many future occasions. I even have access to her personal email address.

Now, is there anything I have left out? Some subject matter worthy of further exchange?

Perhaps the very germane scope of this thread? Yes. Let me close on that point.

If you, Ron and the other rude, sexist, and juvenile posters are the public face of this issue, it is no wonder at all that we are all painted as loons. Your very heart, your soul, is what is exposed. For it is written: Luke 6:45 “A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh”.

Good night!


563 posted on 08/02/2010 10:48:53 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
I will make an exception for some. Several are sincere and try hard to stick to facts. Those few are worthy of respect and I’ll give it to them even while disagreeing. But most of the ones on this thread? Liars. And I despise liars.

I will agree with you and expand it further. Vile, sick, vicious, rabid and prolific liars. Full of angst, malice and blind rage. Seeking to outright slay that with which they cannot understand and refuse to reason. The exact words to describe them are these:

Romans 1:28-32 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient..., undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.

564 posted on 08/02/2010 11:05:59 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

And the reason for including me in your post ?


565 posted on 08/02/2010 11:17:25 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I pinged you once. And only once. And only because Ron pinged you when he insulted me. And I copied his ping list in that single reply. Please, read the thread in order if you are not sure which has begotten which.

Thanks.


566 posted on 08/02/2010 11:22:48 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

I see.

I’ve been reading your posts.

Respectfully, you’re quite a piece of work.

I deduce that you’re quite intelligent. You’ve
stated you come from good stock; but good
golly, lady, why so arrogant, snarky, cocksure
and supercilious ?

If you are a believer, quoting biblically as
you do, do you not know of that gem: faith
is the evidence of things unseen, and whose plan
is Supreme and ultimate?

We know not what is to come in the next hour,
never mind the midterms, nor whom will do what
in any given govt office, courtroom, network
or corporation, nor whom will be struck with
gnawing remorse or guilt, and confess a golden,
precious and vital truth ... NONE of it.

The wheels will turn and events will play out
as they will. But I do know that God will not
be mocked, and that there are forces for good
fighting the righteous fight .. at this very
moment ... unseen .. for this nation’s and
freedom’s preservation. And Amen.


567 posted on 08/02/2010 11:57:53 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

More than welcome to it... ‘tis mine to give, too.


568 posted on 08/03/2010 12:13:01 AM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
If you are a believer, quoting biblically as you do, do you not know of that gem: faith is the evidence of things unseen, and whose plan is Supreme and ultimate?

No. I have never heard such a thing.

I even googled it. Nada. No hits.

I do know something close to what you said, but it has a totally different meaning than that which you purport.

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Let us examine the words.

First we have Faith and it is described not as you said something unseen, but as SUBSTANCE. Substance has mass. It is quantitative. Real. Substantial.

Secondly, it is EVIDENCE. Now, as an attorney I am very familiar with this word. And in the context it is SOLID EVIDENCE. That is to say immutable. Sure. Understood. Proven.

Your wording implied the very opposite. Something unknown, vague, outside of reason. I reject that totally, and with near hostility. Faith, as is my middle name, is something to which I am deeply aware and it is more real than any text we see on this board. The living God calls faith SUBSTANCE and EVIDENCE. Not something ephemeral, mystic, or elusive.

It is because the substantive evidence is all around us our founding fathers, of which my 9th great-grandfather was one, used the words, "Self Evident Truths".

When I speak in these absolute terms, and claim unknown futures as fact, it is I who am being quantitative, real, evidential, and truthful.

When someone tells me they or I cannot know, cannot be sure, I see only those who have never encountered truth and lack faith and understanding.

It is the spirit of Pontius Pilate which asks, "What is truth"? It is the spirit of God which says, "I am the truth".

Sadly, what is missing in this debate, and I keep attempting to interject it, is that our path is ordered. Our future, from a religious or even a quantum mechanical point of view is already done and known. This is not a path of fear nor of ignorance. It is these and the distractions from the tasks at hand which will be the labors to the bitter fruits of our destruction.

If that is too deep of a concept for some, I will put it more basely. Rude, ignorant, insulting conservatives who are unable to reason with their own, are the greater threat to liberty than any outside force. If we are not united, we ARE divided. And it is not "us" who are doing the dividing. We bring only a point of view and ask for reason. We are met with abuse. This is the end of all that the abusers purport to be saving. They are the enemy within.

And they are known by their deeds!

569 posted on 08/03/2010 12:23:34 AM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
Obama Is a Usurper - Illegal President - 20100802 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5
570 posted on 08/03/2010 12:59:47 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

For what purpose in the world are you linking me to this web page?

All I see is another scammer taking money from fools to support himself all the while laughing to the bank at how a sucker is born every minute.

Just how many bogus lawsuits do you intend we should fund? And how much should we give? Do you KNOW anything about this group? Who runs it. Have you spoken with them? In person? Do you know there past dealings? THESE are the things that matter. You are being duped by insipid emotions and have lost all reason.

These are the same cutthroat sharks who duped you all about Terri Schiavo. Now, don’t get me wrong. Let me be very clear. You remember the story? Well, the murdering scum of the earth who killed her, ordered those to kill her and abetted those who killed her, should all burn in the hottest fires of hell forever and ever. Are we clear on that? Good.

There is a BUT coming now... so hang on to reason and don’t let your emotions get the best of you....

But, those who raised money for her cause, of which not a DIME ever made it to her brother and family fighting for her, and MILLIONS were raised right here on FR links, posted by good intentioned but DUPPED FRiends.... those who raise... I mean STOLE money milking her cause, should go to hell FIRST and stay LONGER than eternity!!

How’s that?

Same for Obama. For his crimes. Punishment eternal without end. For the criminals pretending to be conservatives duping you all into thinking you are going to accomplish something, a hotter fire and a greater burden.

But know this.... these Birther fundraisers are telling you more and bigger lies than Obama is telling you.

Fact!

And they are dividing us!

Doubly important FACT.

Stop being a tool.


571 posted on 08/03/2010 1:31:17 AM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

Please review this thread. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2512143/posts

We want to see Obama’s long form birth certificate to verify his father’s citizenship.

I recalled Theseus could not be a citizen of Athens based on Pericles citizenship law....born to citizen parents.

Locating old law dictionaries, and books on citizenship, reading the definitions of a natural born citizen.

It has been quite an adventure. There is plenty of information to cast doubt Obama is a natural born citizen.

We would like the Supreme Court to decide if Obama is a natural born citizen based on the intent of the Founders.

Perhaps your emotional attachments to Obama have shrouded your judgement.


572 posted on 08/03/2010 4:16:11 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith

Les naturels, ou indigenes, font ceux qui font nés dans le pays, de parens citoyens.

Please tell us what naturels meant to the Founders?


573 posted on 08/03/2010 4:22:56 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Again, you’ve shown your inability to hear, see or read — to understand, to comprehend or to acknowledge research and clear logical discussion.


574 posted on 08/03/2010 5:33:44 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: svcw

What would be the consequences? Would he be removed and if so by whom?

No. It’s too late. About all it might do, is prevent him from another term


575 posted on 08/03/2010 5:48:16 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Locating old law dictionaries

You don't need to locate old law dictionaries. Just look up natural-born in an Oxford English Dictionary which is really a history of English language word usage. It's pretty clear from the OED that at the time of the drafting for the Constitution natural-born referred to the legal status of one's parents, and not even the place of birth. They suggest comparison with native born which referred to the place of birth and not the status of the parents.

People can come here blowing smoke all they want, but it is rather obvious why the Framers included this adjective and what they meant.

ML/NJ

576 posted on 08/03/2010 6:02:35 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo

Ah, Tuxedo, you made me laugh - and that’s saying something on a day where everything that can go wrong has. Thanks!


577 posted on 08/03/2010 6:10:22 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Question: Then why would every single other of Obama’s records from kindergarten to law school to medical records etc be scrubbed, locked, sealed, hidden and/or forged?

Answer: He’s got something to hide.

That can not be disputed.


578 posted on 08/03/2010 6:17:11 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: deport; Candor7

Re: We are a little beyond 1774. What about the Constitution and the laws passed regarding Presidential Succession? You think they don’t apply?

King George had no doubt his law didn’t apply.


579 posted on 08/03/2010 6:23:30 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

The Constitution says that only Joe Biden can have the presidential powers, since Obama failed to qualify by Jan 20, 2009.

Anything that Obama has done using the presidential powers can - and should - be contested. That would include if he vetoes the repeal of healthcare reform (and hopefully a bunch of other unconstitutional crap) that the Republican Congress will pass.

This issue is far, far from being over. The dems are putting everything they’ve fought for on the line by keeping somebody who is documentably forbidden from having the presidential powers instead of letting Joe Biden do what is granted him in the Constitution. If they insist on having a fake in the office they will end up having NOBODY in the office from a legal perspective. Laws can be passed without a President’s signature, but only a President can veto. When we get a Republican Congress they will not be able to afford having no valid President - because it means nothing can be vetoed.

If we clean house in the elections, the fun can begin in earnest. We need to let our leaders know that - and know that both we and the law are on their side.


580 posted on 08/03/2010 6:33:00 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; SirJohnBarleycorn

On the 3rd of July 2007, U.S. Congressman Eni Faleomavaega would touch down in Jakarta, Indonesia. A staunch outspoken critic of Jakarta’s rule over West Papua, New Guinea and a crusader for West Papua’s right to self-determination, the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Asia, The Pacific and the Global Enviroment, Faleomavaega promised to be a force to be reckoned with.

Having been barred from visiting Papau by the Indonesian government, Faleomavaega would instead settle for a private meeting in Jakarta with Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Barnabas Suebu the governor for the Indonesian province of Papau. The Papuan issue though wasn’t the only thing on Faleomavaega’s mind, being one of Barack Obama’s most devoted disciples, Faleomavaega would be seeking the Indonesian government’s assistance in supporting Barack Obama’s presidential campaign as well as making the requisite pilgrimage to Barack Obama’s childhood school.

According to our Indonesian sources, “officials” who accompanied Faleomavaega were interested in acquiring any and all documentation or photographs of a young Barry Soetoro for America’s “national archives” and they were offering cash, lots of it. In a show of faith, Barack Obama’s childhood school would be one of the very first beneficiaries of this outpouring receiving thousands of dollars to upgrade the school and for the purchase of computer equipment, thanks in part to the benevolence of this visiting junket.

The challenge of course was securing Indonesian goverment records potentially damaging to Barack Obama’s candidacy for the US presidency as well as other records pertaining to a young Barry Soetoro and his family wouldn’t be so easy to acquire and secure, and for this, the visitors would need the assistance and cooperation of the Indonesian government.

It’s not that getting Indonesian government help is difficult, it’s not. It’s no secret that Indonesia is one of the most corrupt countries on the planet, but we’re not talking about the challenge of dealing with corrupt government officials here, but rather, dealing with the “true believers of change”. Convincing the Indonesian government that an Obama presidency will be able to deliver that “change” and that it was in the interest of both countries to see that Barack Obama was elected was nothing more than a fait accompli for Faleomavaega’s entourage.

For West Papau’s governor in attendance, having been pacified at the prospect that an Obama presidency would enable him to make zillions trading carbon credits on the Chicago Climate Exchange, Barnabas Suebu would sit quietly as the fate of West Papau was decided.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

http://laotze.blogspot.com/2008/09/obama-throwing-papau-under-bus.html


581 posted on 08/03/2010 6:33:32 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

YOu can quote the Constitution and anything else you want. Proving now that Obama isn’t qualified to legally be president just isn’t going to change anything over the next 2 yrs - it will be tied up and argued until his term is over - just being realistic.

btw - Who the heck wants Biden in there?


582 posted on 08/03/2010 6:42:14 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding
Then wonder if McCain was a party to the fraud.

Most definitely.

John McCain chose ambition over honor when it came right down to it.


583 posted on 08/03/2010 7:08:08 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1; RachelFaith

I fed it into an Internet translator once...it had it, “The native, or indigenous...”

And since it was more about philosophy than law, it dealt with 2 categories only - natives, and non-citizens. However, it is pretty obvious that citizenship is more complex than that, which is why there is naturalization. And with the 14th amendment, there is reliance on birth in country rather than parentage - you will recall, the 14th makes no mention of parents.

As for NBC, the courts - where you want to fight this out - have repeatedly said the key to understanding original intent is by the analogous phrase ‘natural born subject’ known to all the Founders from English Common Law. You may think the courts have erred in that determination, but if so, they erred in it long before Obama was born.

Citizenship in America is not defined by Roman law, nor by Greek, but by American law. I may disagree with how American law developed, but it is what it is. Not because of Obama, but because of court decisions made many years before Obama was born.


584 posted on 08/03/2010 7:12:18 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
"HE IS NOT SANE. Therefore you cannot apply normal sane reasons to his actions. He is a narcissist of the first order. Your entire conspiracy premise is based upon what a reasonable person would do. He is a pathological liar whose whole world has been a sham. He would do anything to avoid confronting that reality. THAT is far more motivational than . . ."

You need to learn to express yourself -- heh, heh, heh!
585 posted on 08/03/2010 7:21:27 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

For me the rule of law is the main thing. We have to regain the rule of law, no matter how long it takes.

But from a practical standpoint, this issue will decide whether it is possible to undo the unconstitutional acts of the democratic Congress that just put us through Hell.

The dems tied themselves to this illegal president, and that millstone is going to sink everything they’ve done to screw America.

That is, if we can embolden our leaders to realize that the people and the rule of law is on their side.

It’s definitely a battle worth fighting.


586 posted on 08/03/2010 7:23:34 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith; little jeremiah

Kindergarten records would contain vaccination records.

If he was vaccinated in Kenya for Un-gaw-wah disease, that might be interesting?


587 posted on 08/03/2010 7:27:12 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
That leaves me with where I began... WHAT "DO" we do? What? Really. Seriously. None of this fantasy land mumbo jumbo If Only nonsense. WHAT?

OK! I'll bite. What do we do?

You've criticized everyone. What's your solution? What's your plan?

588 posted on 08/03/2010 7:42:50 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

If Jerome Corsi is accurate, Kenya sealed some kind of medical records for Obama.


589 posted on 08/03/2010 7:44:59 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

“Bill van Allen” uploaded “Chris Strunk Says” to scribd

http://www.scribd.com/billvanallen

Not sure if “Saebarkah” is a typo

s/b “Soebarkah” ?


590 posted on 08/03/2010 7:55:01 AM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
But, those who raised money for her cause, of which not a DIME ever made it to her brother and family fighting for her, and MILLIONS were raised right here on FR links, posted by good intentioned but DUPPED FRiends.... those who raise... I mean STOLE money milking her cause, should go to hell FIRST and stay LONGER than eternity!!

That may be true, but you need to be more specific about such charges. As for the birthers and whatnot, the same thing applies: if you are going to criticize the groups that are raising money for lawsuits, then you need to do your own research.

You said "Do you KNOW anything about this group? Who runs it. Have you spoken with them? In person?"

If I'm going to support someone's cause, it is hardly efficient or appropriate for me to speak to them in person. If you decide to do that for this cause or any other, please post your results so we can all learn from them.

591 posted on 08/03/2010 8:06:28 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith; Mr Rogers; Las Vegas Ron

This thread is/was about “disappeared” Passport pages for SADOSD (Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro and Dunham)!

You FINOs changed the subject, as usually, to fit your agenda in protecting your dear “leader”(?) in the W.H. with the talking points from upper up!!

Very often when I’ve mentioned Barry’s Indonesian citizenship it was met with ridicule and IIRC also from Rogers. To stay on the topic regarding this thread and what that is all about, here are comments made directly from Chris Strunk’s own mouth/pen:!!!

Chris Strunk says:
Monday, August 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM

Strunk is in opposition to a summary judgment filed by the DOJ in my case Strunk v DOS et al. DCD 08-cv-2234 seeks further disclosure in regards to DOS spoliation of documents in regards to my request under FOIA the passport and related records of Stanley Ann Dunham et al.. I have been awaiting these records and more since October 2008 when I first filed a FOIA request related to my active case in New York Supreme Court where the records will be used when the disposition of the Summary Judgment is complete; Hopefully, I will receive the additional records that exist from 1960 onward too. Clearly when the DOS release is combined with the US Customs and Immigration service release to Ken Allen amounting to about 90 pages shows that Lolo Soetoro and Ann Soetoro were having difficulties that would only explain the removal of BHO from her passport in 1968 especially since the Indonesian Government in Soetoro’s words, any American, was in jeopardy there in Indonesia due to the anti-American feelings” is shown at page 103 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/35245956/Strunk-s-DOS-and-DHS-FOIA-Responses-DCD-08-Cv-2234-and-Ken-Allen-s-DOS-and-DHS-Responses-AZDC-09-Cv-373 attached to the U.S. Government memo of January 12, 1966 with pages marked 000077 through 000080 therein at page 000078 regarding Lolo Soetoros request for a INA section 212(e) waiver and two year extension for his stay in the USA with Ann Soetoro, (that according to the US Government document of August 6, 1968 all three returned to Indonesia on July 20, 1966); Soetoro states:

“Most importantly, anti-American feeling has reached a feverish pitch under the direction of the Indonesian communist party, and I have been advised by both family and friends in Indonesia that it would be dangerous to endeavor to return with my wife at the present time. Of secondary importance is the fact that my wife does not yet speak Indonesian, Not only would she be forced to cut short her college education, but she would be left in a position of isolation in the community,”

It appears from the cross comparison on both the Customs and DOS FOIA released documents that on October 20, 1971 Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro (SADS) and BHO (a.k.a Saebarkah Soetoro) together boarded Pan Am Airlines Flight 812 unaccompanied by Lolo M. Soetoro in Djakarta Indonesia and arrived in Honolulu Hawaii on October 21, 1971 and sought entry into the USA on an expired Passport issued July 19, 1965 according to the DS 1423 Form for REQUEST BY UNITED STATES NATIONAL FOR AND REPORT OF EXCEPTION TO SECTION 53.1, TITLE 22 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS with use of the expired Passport of July 19, 1965 shown as page 6 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/35245956/Strunk-s-DOS-and-DHS-FOIA-Responses-DCD-08-Cv-2234-and-Ken-Allen-s-DOS-and-DHS-Responses-AZDC-09-Cv-373.

It is important to discover whether or not based upon SADS’ August 13, 1968 Passport Renewal Application to DOS shown as page 3 and 4 of http://www.scribd.com/doc/35245956/Strunk-s-DOS-and-DHS-FOIA-Responses-DCD-08-Cv-2234-and-Ken-Allen-s-DOS-and-DHS-Responses-AZDC-09-Cv-373 SADS excluded Saebarkah Soetoro (BHO)from her Passport of July 19, 1965; and therefore, left no way for BHO who is presumed to also have the right to an Indonesian Passport under Lolo Soetoro to reenter the USA with SADS except by use of the expired July 19 1965 passport.

That Declarant among other items of interest in the analysis presented by Dr Corsi in his Worldnet Daily Article (WND) takes issue with the insinuation that the 1965 edition of SADS passport was only good for 3 years when in fact it was to expire July 18, 1970 according to the actual reference by the US Government shown in the upper right corner of the application located at page 3; however in August 13 1968 SADS made an early application to renew the 1965 to remove BHO (a.k.a. Saebarkah Soetoro) from her own passport.

At that time, Lolo Soetoro was in a difficult effort with the State Department and US Customs and Immigration to obtain reentry into the USA and needed to reflect Saebarkah Soetoro (BHO) as an Indonesian for his own safety. That Saebarkah Soetoro (BHO) according to his own writing in 1971 would re-enter back into the USA to live with his Grandma Madelyn Dunham

Except for the fact that the Exception request for use of the expired July 19, 1965 passport without use of an American passport as Saebarkah Soetoro as an Indonesian citizen which he was also entitled to an Indonesian Passport made without being on SADS renewed Passport of August 13 1968 made it easier for Saebarkah Soetoro / BHO to travel and obtain a renewed Indonesian Passport, rather than a British or even Kenyan passport that would be more difficult to explain or obtain to the Indonesian Government (having a USA passport there in Indonesian would dangerously expose Lolo Soetoro to government scrutiny since BHO was born in Kenya not the USA was adopted by Lolo Soetoro as a Indonesian citizen).

Thereafter 1971, Saebarkah Soetoro living in the USA went to the Indonesian Embassy in Hawaii to obtain or renew the Indonesian passport as part of his college funding program and that in 1981 through 1984 was then used while attending Columbia University to enter Indonesia, Pakistan and Afghanistan while working for Zbigniew Brzezinski then of the Scholl of Foreign Affairs and the National Security Council with the Carter Administration and Reagan Administration transition.


592 posted on 08/03/2010 8:07:06 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
Hey babe, you have NOT been here long enough to "teach" more "Senior" FReeper FRiends what to say or what NOT to say. According to the founder; if you can't stand the heat in the kitchen, then get out of it. Sometimes it can be a rough place to voice your opinion!

Irony: An immigrant telling ME about illegals.

You got that right. Through my profession I had a plethora of opportunities to "sneak" into YOUR country, but i opted out for the right course, taking me 3-1/2 years filling huge amount of papers before I could get my entry visa, the "Green Card" and finally receive my Form N550. You think that's ironically or honorable?

I admit the English is my third language, how many do you speak??

Belittling that issue is very edifying, right???

You see you asked for it when you included me in your post # 505:

This commentary is not “discouraging” one, it is a slap in the face of a man who is acting like a 13 year old little boy!

Throwing a tantrum, whining, pouting, and posting insults,and belittling remarks laced with juvenile sexual innuendo because he cannot just deal with the hand he has been dealt.

You need to grow up!

You might need to do some growing up yourself and stop lecturing us like another John Hagee, no offense to him!!!

The real question here is, WHY do you think there are some "missing" Passport documents, that's what we want to know among his other "sealed" records???

593 posted on 08/03/2010 8:44:52 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; bushpilot1; RachelFaith

Excerpts from the Guardian, I wonder why George kept the books, hmmmm???:

NEW YORK — If George Washington were alive today, he might face a hefty overdue library fine.

New York City’s oldest library says one of its ledgers shows that the president has racked up 220 years’ worth of late fees on two books he borrowed, but never returned.

One of the books was the “Law of Nations,” which deals with international relations. The other was a volume of debates from Britain’s House of Commons.

Both books were due on Nov. 2, 1789. According to the Guardian, “At today’s prices, adjusted for inflation, he would face a late fine of $300,000.”

New York Society Library head librarian Mark Bartlett says the institution isn’t seeking payment of the fines, but would love to get the books back.

The ledger also lists books being taken out by other founding fathers, including Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr and John Jay.

The entry on Washington simply lists the borrower as “president.”


594 posted on 08/03/2010 8:57:34 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; RachelFaith; little jeremiah

And medical records would show details of his huge brain surgery according to the large scar running from right ear upward and across the cranium down to left ear, hmmmm???


595 posted on 08/03/2010 9:01:15 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
I really thought about the laws of presidentia succession. Virtualy all of the primary sucessors actually aided Obama in his fraud, and are jut as responsibles he is. In fact according to the Constituton we do not have a president even now. The innauguree is unqualified, flawed ab initin, bith tge VP and the Speaker aided in this fraud, how could they succeed a non president? I suppose we could cotinue odwn into the Senateeadeship, but there too we have frauds who ided and abetted the non president.

he solution les very much outside the constitution. This was not meant to happen but did happen through crime.At every check and balance, nclding the electoral college, the process was traduced. The ontitution s nt to blame for that.Those who had the duty to enfoce the constitution are to blame. They purposefully traduced their dtyand violated their respectve oaths of office.

This is an extraordinary situation, ,which requires extaordinary remedies, and we should not shy away from them.And so the people must convene a proper representative body to handle the problem.Normlly the Supreme Court would handle it, but they have so far refused. That leaves the people themselves.Congress needs to meet inspecial essiono to handle the situation, or we the people need to convene a people's congress to handle it just like we did in 1774, and we need to appoint an interim goverment executive branchfor 18 months until we can hold a special presidential election, and ge back to business as usual.

I have thought a lot about it. I can't see it happening any other way.The states might need to name their representatives to the People's Congress, and the military needs to support the process.The time for that is not now,but events may very likely pick up very quickly which will show the need for it.

It would not take very long, a few weeks. It would not be the end of the world either, but a new beginning so we can get back to our constitution in short order.

596 posted on 08/03/2010 9:07:28 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes......is fascist... ..He meets every diagnostic of history. en get as far as a Ran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

It’s so clear a child can understand it.

The toadies are really getting riled up. I wonder why.


597 posted on 08/03/2010 10:18:56 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

You are arguing from the future.

You cannot and do not know the future.

You are for some reason trying to sow seeds of discouragement.

Fie on discouragement, that is how wars are lost, not won.


598 posted on 08/03/2010 10:20:55 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Good point; vaccination records.


599 posted on 08/03/2010 10:21:57 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Perhaps your emotional attachments to Obama have shrouded your judgement.

Did IQ's suddenly drop while I was away?

You are not paying attention.

Let me spell it out for you in three easy lines. READ them.

First: I do not support Obama, so knock off that red herring. I consider him to be the most evil man to have taken power in this nation's history and the damgae he is and will continue to do, IRREPARABLE.

Second: Non of this is an emotional reaction. These are facts to which I have come to sudden terms, and for which necessitate drastic, clear and providential actions. That is, actions which will provide for me and mine, after this course of events has completed and the realities are fully implemented.

Third, and this is the most difficult for you. So, please, pay very careful attention, do not skim, do not dismiss. Your lives and the lives of your progeny depend upon your understanding and the actions you choose to take following.

Obama is NOT Bill Clinton. He is a not as Twit McConnell says, "going to be moved to the center". He is a cornered rabid dog and he will bite. He is GOING to pass Amnesty. Get over it, deal with it. Plan for it. Know what it means politically, culturally, and demographically and do not pretend it won't happen.

Obama is NOT concerned with polls or even getting reelected or even having a majority. He will do these evil deeds in December of this year while the American public is celebrating the landslide election and buying Christmass gifts.

The new Congress, will be under the SAME spineless game playing, good old boy, RINOS. They will NOT have the votes, or the will, to actually UNDO, REPAIR, or ARREST any of these unconstitutional, abusive, usurping, damning, destructive actions. They just will NOT do what needs to be done. They never have and they never will. Social Security is Unconstitutional. Have they done ANYTHING about that in 50 years? Abortion on Demand? Homosexuality being taught to Kindergartners? Any of the societal ills of the 20th century? Have we ever abated ONE? NO!

I know that is a sobering thought. I know you cling to the hope that America has finally had enough. Those are informed but biased fantasies. The American people are frogs being boiled and while the water is very hot, they are STILL NOT JUMPING OUT!

Lastly we come to this magic bullet. "If we prove he is erh, was never legitimately President, then, THAT will make it all go away.

You are DEAD Wrong. For all the reasons above in my post and all of the arguments posted by Mr Rogers and others.

Now, if you are still in a state of calm reading, if you are not agitated, which is THEIR goal, to remove you from reason and blind you with false hopes and wild goose chases, please read on.

I actually think you, aka Birthers, have a technical point. You could very well be right, but it is nevertheless a fools errand. You will win this battle and thus LOSE the entire war.

I said Obama was no Bill Clinton, he's no Dan Rather either. Dan was thrown under the bus, as a useful idiot. Obama isn't going to be stopped by such means. Obama's life long goal is Revolutionary Marxism. You MUST know how Marxists think! He intends to just DO these things and BREAK the system.

He has succeeded. Did you hear that? It IS broken. Here is just one example.

1982-1986 was the fastest period of growth in American History, in terms of income, jobs, etc rebounding from the Carter 21% inflation years. 4 years. To recover from the damages done by Obama, will require 16 consecutive 1982-1986 years. 400% greater growth. Never happened. Never will happen. It is a mathematical impossibility.

Worse! The RINO Elites do not WANT it to happen. They seek the end of the "we the people" and are actively playing their part on the game to remake a new America where you have no liberty and only the freedoms they grant you.

And while all this is happening, you spend hours and hours in this fantasy that finding a smoking gun will FIX it?

THAT is my frustration. There are so many REAL things we could, should and MUST be doing, and yet, here you are.... Tilting at the windmill they constructed and thinking it is the dragon itself.

Fool, Fool, Fool. Nobody bleeds for the dancer.

600 posted on 08/03/2010 10:44:32 AM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 501-550551-600601-650651-664 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson