Posted on 08/02/2010 3:51:47 PM PDT by chicagolady
Edited on 08/02/2010 4:15:57 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
WARNING: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS PROFANE LANGUAGE THAT SOME MAY FIND OFFENSIVE. READER DISCRETION IS ADVISED.
The folks at HillBuzz.org dropped a major bombshell this morning. They’re reporting that they have what they consider to be “unimpeachable sources” who say that Illinois Republican Party Chairman Pat Brady referred to the HillBuzz.org writers as a “bunch of #### ####.” That exact slur was reportedly uttered by Pat Brady – obviously in the presence of others – just this weekend.
For the record, it’s no secret that the writers at HillBuzz are gay men. They are quite honest about that and in fact they make reference to their lifestyle quite regularly in their writing. So at least they are honest about it – unlike some others high-up in the Illinois GOP hierarchy and unlike at least a couple of candidates running statewide right now on the GOP ticket. Pat Brady clearly has no problem with those gay men. It appears that Brady’s hatred and anger only come out when it’s gay men exposing his lack of leadership.
Pat Brady is no doubt upset that HillBuzz’s dogged coverage of a Cook County Republican Party sex-related scandal (that turned into a cover-up scandal) eventually got legs. The Huffington Post for example picked up on the story and published its own recap last week. And then on Friday some Democrat women held a press conference in Chicago to try and take full political advantage. Since few normal people know who Pat Brady is, the Democrats tried to tie-in GOP gubernatorial nominee Bill Brady. That was probably an unfair stretch, but they did it anyway. NBC-5 Chicago weighed in with coverage.
I thought I was very savvy (I’m a good girl, but thought I was well aware of lots of gutter talk and goings-on).
You just threw in ANOTHER term I’ve never heard.
I never heard of “tea-bagger/ing” until last year, either.
I’m still being steadily corrupted after all these years.
Here in Boston we had a talk show host who referred to a candidate for governor as a “fat lesbian”. She was fat. She was a proud lesbian but they ran him out of town anyway.
Rahm Emmanuel may be orchestrating a re-run of the past.
He ran ads against McSweeney (for Bean) that started by raising a minor issue and constantly repeating “McSweeney, out of the mainstream.” McSweeney (his campaign manager) did not respond although he had the money. He probably figured it was minor.
The ads pounded away non-stop “Out of the mainstream”.
Then in the final week the ads changed to “extremist”. McSweeney had not built his own image. So Rahm built it for him. McSweeney was toast.
Currently, Pat Brady (and unelected self-appointed State Central Committee) have not built an image for the IL GOP. It is a confusing and fuzzy mixture of corruption, cronyism, sex scandal, anti-corruption, tea party, etc, etc.
So, since Brady has not built an image for the GOP, Rahm (and friends) will fill the vacuum.
Brady has not yet found the backbone (and other anatomy) to exclude the corrupt from the party and limit the party exclusively to the non-corrupt.
Okay, let’s do.
It’s not a slur if it true.
I say we bring back use of words like “faggot” and “queer”. That is the only honest way of referring to people who engage in homosexual behavior, because it is the only way to confer properly the inherent disgust. Allowing the Left to sanitize certain behaviors and peoples, removing words from the language and coopting positive words (”gay”), is an Orwellian method of shaping thought. If a word for a concept is removed from the language, it makes it more difficult to express or even form the concept. Likewise, if you outlaw all terms for a behavior that have negative connotations, you remove the ability to express disapproval and disgust with the behavior, making resistance to its spread more difficult.
Tie a string around it, set it afire and you'll have a flaming faggot.
No, he should have said “sodomites”...;-)
They call each other that and worse every day of the week.
And the problem is......?
Anyone who uses the word “gay” to describe people who engage in same sex sodomy is furthering their agenda. In “The Pink Swastika” the author explains that the word “homosexual” was invented by a homosexual in the latter part of the 1800s, I think in Germany, to give sodomites a feeling of “special community” and an identity. So that’s a propaganda word as well.
Of course they do. Queers can hardly talk about anything else. Homosexuality is one of the most obsessive neurotic disorders there is.
Regardless, I have to ask : is it true?
Ummmm.
OK.
Being old-fashioned, my descriptive work of choice is "pervert."
That is still a genuine word in English, no?
I really don't care if the Urban Dictionary recently redefined it.
Sorry ... GOP/TEAPARTY people are called “TeaBaggers” ... nothing happens. So nothing should happen here. Move on.
Sod=dirt, mite=bugs. dirtbugs.
I always liked the term butt pirates or rump rangers myself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.