Posted on 08/30/2010 5:50:24 AM PDT by Lexluthor69
“The minute they had the first one in place they’d touch it off.”
Agreed. This “AQ has nukes in US cities and is biding it’s time” line has been circulating for a decade, always contingent on waiting for the right time or waiting for more to arrive - BS. For those who hate us that much, and whose greatest attack was merely flying a couple planes into buildings, the right time to push the button on a nuke is the instant it arrives in downtown Any City.
The fact a mushroom cloud hasn’t appeared is proof AQ doesn’t have the ability.
Alex, I’ll take, Liberal(Leftist) cities that I would never live in, for 600 please.
That would go a long way in clearing the path for the next Republican presidential nominee.
*******************
I was thinking it would effect de facto secession.
Too bad about Fisherman’s Wharf.
“MT is not as remote as you may think. Besides, it’s full.”
7 people per square mile is full?
US average is 81 people per sq mi.
:-)
You don’t keep them in the city. You move them in on moment of use. Sniffers detect them when too late.
But I doubt this is a ‘real’ report. False but plausible.
FWIW, Atlanta (sadly upwind from me) is likely on the list as it is the fall-back location for the federal government in case DC is whacked.
This many bombs would have come from Russian stockpiles, I am not so sure they would use them immediately, they know they cannot punch superman in the stomach w/o some kryptonite(ie, multiple warheads) w/o devastating reprisal, also realise UH Bummer has the football, will he launch to protect us?They can sneak in oil tanker sized ships of dope daily, surely they can bring in nukes, Iran already has Russian nukes get real..It is possible as well that Russian generals have the detonation codes and will not use them until assured of the outcome. We would certainly blame Iran, etc..Iran may be willing to accept that outcome to be able to strike us that hard..
We have played politics with our country instead of looking at what is real about our enemies.
This had better be stopped - I like Las Vegas.
Seriously, if they had one across the border they would have set it off. It would be by far the biggest terror attack in world history. They would have no need to wait for a second one to make their point.
Chicago, San Francisco and Boston?
Well, maybe it’s not all bad news.
Why? I saw it. A routine post-apoctalyptic action flick redeemed somewhat by the presence of Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.
Somebody should've told LeBron James about this.
Here's my guess - they'll take out Israel first - then Tampa - then turn to us and 'explain' there are 8 more nukes scattered around the US - and we might as well give up because there's nothing to fight over any more - now that Israel is destroyed...
If dems are still in power, we'll wave the white flag and hope for the best ( there will NEVER be a 'best' again... but that's a different story). If we elect the right people, we'll destroy the whole ME and we'll lose a few million citizens. They probably will lie about the number of nukes they have that work - but we'll lose a few cities... Won't be pretty, but it'll be better than the alternative.
On the positive side, Homeland Security will protect us from American citizens who are Christian, middle class and white...
If oyu didn’t get it you never will.
No kidding. As an Assachusetts resident there would be no love lost losing Boston. Less libs in the state that way and all the fallout goes East.
I’ve got my idodine pills. Let ‘er rip.
When Israel and Tampa are destroyed, Iran must know there will be automatic retaliation against the ME.
If Iran knows the spineless ones in Washington will ‘talk’ they'll know it's a win...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.