Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

I think they were overly-optimistic in assuming that anybody selected for such an important position would be a patriot and have love for the law. A couple of centuries on and we see that this was a mistake.

The current supremes seem far more interested in a quiet life than taking on one of the more important constitutional issues of our time. They are failing to serve We The People and have to be impeached.


6 posted on 09/02/2010 8:15:35 AM PDT by IntolerantOfTreason (The AMERICAN President should be an AMERICAN, NOT an AFRICAN-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: IntolerantOfTreason
“Have to be impeached” well, at LAST you seem to have inadvertently stumbled upon an actual CONSERVATIVE and CONSTITUTIONAL position!

Why do you consider direct election a greater assurance of patriotism and love of the law? Need I remind you that 0bama was elected with some 54% of the vote?

A mistake? The Constitution a mistake? The reasoning of our founders (which you seem unfamiliar with at best) mistaken? And you call yourself a conservative? What is it you are trying to conserve?

7 posted on 09/02/2010 8:21:39 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson