Posted on 09/17/2010 10:17:23 PM PDT by Rabin
Barack Obama Sr; Kenyan Luo tribesman who "studied" at Harvard, was a polygamist, four wives and eight children. He was also a drunk, (no wounder). Driving plastered, managed to kill at least one other man and finally himself.
D'Souza, "Obama has roots that are foreign is not an allegation, it's a statement of fact."
Where is the Birth Certificate?
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
I just finished reading it again. This time I let it all really sink in. D’Souza really nailed it, IMHO. Every American should be forced to read it. Obama has no business being the President of the United States. None. He is a bitter little, little man who hates America and its people.
I completely agree.
That makes two of us. At least.
If it’s not true, why not ignore it?
Actually that came from the Columbia Journalism Review .... BTW did they ever comment on Vanity Fair’s Sarah Palin article?
You want to talk about smears .... !
D'Souza's way smarter than average. He spends his time on what matters.
Would you actually mean wonders? Just asking and I am not the spelling police, many of us, including me, make typos during our comments.
I bet Karl Rove will bring up and list out each of these things next time he’s giving a political analysis. /heavy s
Well!! If someone wants to reinforce their argument, Columbia is just the reference.
PS - Hmmm, Columbia, Ayres, Hussein. Is there a connection?
yitbos
"Robin a psychotherapist in Berkeley" missed the most obvious sign of mental illness. Hussein is a self confessed liberal.
I still like the "self confessed doper" rationalization.
yitbos
Yeah, there is that.
yitbos
Its interesting to read the attacks on the article on the comment section, most seem to fall into a couple of categories 1) Obama had no contact with his anti colonial father therefore the father could not possibily of have had any influence, and therefore this cannot explain Obamas motives as being anti colonialism while, 2) They are saying America was founded on anti colonialism therefore Obama is a true patriot, and really is anti colonialism and they are proud of this!
Note that 1) and 2) are mutually exclusive, such that with argument 1) Liberals try to distance any ideas that there causes are anti colonial. While 2) liberals have no objection to be called anti colonial! Typical, first they will deny and lie, but when they loose that argument then they try to change the language to make something derogatory sound as good, (like killing babies is pro is choice).
Regarding the anti - colonial roots of the US, while this is somewhat true, this political agenda was 200 years old, and what was anti - colonial 200 years ago, does not have the same meaning as it does in the present, which today has nothing to do with expansion, and subjugation of otherwise independent cultures, anti - colonialism objections today are really short hand for anti capitalism, anti – freedom, anti-Christian doctrine. So it is telling, that liberals, concede proudly that Osama is anti - colonial in the terms of the current meaning of the word, which is basically means anti American.
D’Souza nails the Obama Agenda, and uses Obamas Father as just one example of the circle of influence surrounding the young Obama and his family with its 3rd world anti American roots.
AND note one last thing, if Obamas 3rd world influences as a theory is wrong as a means to explain the seemingly illogical Obama Agenda, note liberal bloggers are not stepping up to deny the facts that Obama Agenda does not like putting Americans first, and that is how D’Souza nails them, Gibbs and the like are so busy trying to spin the web of how the theory is based upon myths and lies, while making no attempt to deny that Obamas is not acting in the best interest of the western Judeo-Christian culture, and they offer no reason why or deny that the Obama agenda is not supported by the majorty of the american public.
“Obama has no business being the President of the United States. None. He is a bitter little, little man who hates America and its people.”
It took awhile but even the Democrats I know are beginning to see it.
There’s a Jack Cashill piece over at American Thinker (don’t have the link handy) that does rebut some of Dsouza’s piece. The main thrust of his rebuttal is that Zer0’s “father” the Kenyan did drop out of the Zer0’s life early on. But he goes on to point out that a lot of what Zer0 did get was based on similar points of view from his mother and from Ayers, who wrote the book Dsouza claims was all about Zer0’s daddy. Zer0’s foundation, viewpoint and beliefs are (if I read it right) the same, it’s just the source that’s different. That is, he’s still doing the things Dsouza says he is, but they’re a result of Ayers’ influence (and others of his radical friends circle), and not directly from his father.
Did Dinesh give any credit to L. E. Ikenga? I hope so.
Again the smear and no substance. The White House, by their attack, vastly raised the profile of this article and it's analysis. Why? A thin-skinned reaction to an article hitting the bullseye? Or do they see it as another birth certificate issue, that they use to try to get their opponents dismissed as nuts? Muhammad Ali could do the rope a dope to wear out his opponent, I don't see Obama as having the abs to take all these body blows.
And using the worst Press Secretary (after Dede Myers, but she was soon gone) at the attacker ain't gonna persuade anybody. And why did Gibbs comment on Palin speaking to the Reagan Dinner in Des Moines Iowa as dipping her toe in for a Presidential run? Is that really within the purview of the Presidential press secretary?
Do they think Palin is so beyond the pale that they think bringing this up simply discredits the entire GOP? Really? These guys make the Carter Presidency look like a well-oiled machine in comparison.
You and Reiko can expect a visit from the Secret Service. No joke.
Yeah, right. lol
Supposedly, Obama is intellectually brilliant, but he has had an extremely narrow intellectual background.
I have Das Kapital and Mein Kampf in the original Klingon in my library. Does Obama have Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises or Friedrich von Hayek? He's been in a bubble his entire life.
And that bubble is going to be popped November 2nd. Watch for Obama's reaction. Watch for him to lash out even more. What are the remaining Democrats going to do, when they see this? Clinton still had people coming onto his sinking ship in the last 6 months of his Presidency. Clinton was distinctively American. How 'alienating' will Obama's coming tantrum be? What's his Party going to do?
Captain, my Captain? It's going to be Gibbsy and Obama tied to the mast going down on the ship. This isn't good for America, thank you Democrats and the Media for selecting this guy, covering up for him and getting him elected without any vetting. Thanks to the 'smartest guys in the room'. The stupid twit Palin had the guy figured out. The genius's didn't. Who's smart again?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.