Yes, they would hammer it, because she is a Republican.
But not if she was a Democrat, any more than they would bring up the witchcraft of a Dem candidate.
“Yes, they would hammer it, because she is a Republican.”
Probably- mostly to try to score points on how ‘tough’ they supposedly are on national security issues (Heh)...
...But if a Republican admitted to dabbling in Sharia, they would also use the person as a pawn to hammer the rest of the Republican party. On the mosque issue, the Sharia-dabbler would be trotted out by the MSM to criticize any Conservative who opposed the GZM (much like McCain and others are always used to attack those eeeevil ‘extremist’ Conservatives anytime the liberal Republicans ‘reach across the aisle’) for being ‘intolerant’. The Sharia-dabbler would be used to criticize all the Republicans who voted against Sharia-endorsing Elena Kagan, etc.
The only concern for them is achieving more power at that given moment- ‘consistency’ is irrelevant.
(love the tagline, btw :-) )