Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Related FR thread here
1 posted on 09/20/2010 10:14:15 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: markomalley; Grizzled Bear; ScoopAmma; Irisshlass; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

37 posted on 09/21/2010 7:54:57 PM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

So who does he expect to fight the war if all of these “bigots” “ get out”?


39 posted on 09/21/2010 7:58:24 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

But through the Pentagon, Bostick is denying he ever said anything like that: “The statements attributed to me are inaccurate. I simply did not make those statements. Moreover, as a member of the Department of Defense Comprehensive Review Working Group, I have been extremely careful not to express any views that might influence the integrity of the comprehensive review. I therefore have not expressed any opinions that might suppress the opinions of anyone participating in our discussions. I find the statements falsely attributed to me to be personally reprehensible.”

So is the Washington Times recanting? Nope. Brett Drecker, the paper’s editorial page editor, tells Politico Bostick “either forgot what he said, is confused, or is lying,” citing multiple sources for the quote.


40 posted on 09/21/2010 8:01:35 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Where is the logic in a movement that tells boys who want to be girls they can change... But tells those who struggle with same sex attraction that they were born that way... And therefore can not change.

Tragic... The withdrawal of the hope is the biggest contributing factor to the psychology of suicide... And these ‘advocates’ promote that loss of hope.

Sad.


41 posted on 09/21/2010 8:10:27 PM PDT by rwilson99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Interesting quote from Varnell. I guess this explains why homosexuals began forming their own ‘churches’ about 10 years ago and began to rewrite the Bible to fit their agenda.

Their objective: “So the gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people’s view of homosexuality.”


45 posted on 09/22/2010 2:44:50 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

You will obey or we will destroy you.

‘They hate us for our freedoms’. What country was that again?


50 posted on 09/22/2010 7:17:09 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

‘Civil rights’ destroying our nation one brick at a time.


51 posted on 09/22/2010 7:18:26 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Homosexual “rights” and religious liberty are NOT compatible, period.


52 posted on 09/22/2010 7:21:52 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

If all Christians were to not enlist or re-enlist, who would fight Obama’s war?


60 posted on 09/22/2010 10:23:00 PM PDT by mckenzie7 (Democrats = Trough Sloppers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; wagglebee

So Obama’s Brave New Military is willing to permit violent jihadist Islamic supremacists in the ranks in the name of diversity but shows intolerance for Christians who believe homosexuality is still a sin as it has been for thousands of years.


62 posted on 09/27/2010 10:47:29 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"..the same radical homosexual activists who continually cry for more "tolerance" are anything but tolerant. This is a spiritual war. The homosexual movement is not a civil rights movement. It is an attempt at moral revolution. An attempt to change people's view of homosexuality.

The sex positive agenda as espoused by Reich, Kinsey, SEICUS, Planned Parenthood and others is about ending ALL moral judgements over ALL sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partners. They consider abstinence to be unhealthy as it is a supression of sexual desires. They believe the orgasm to be a birthright to be enjoyed by everyone at every age in any cirmcumstance without judgement.

They also deride Christianity specifically as being "sex negative". So they have established an identity they posit as contrary to another religious view (so what if their religion is atheist secular humanist, it is still a practiced religion to them).

No establishment of THIS religion and supression of all other faiths.

63 posted on 09/27/2010 10:53:19 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson