[jamese777]

Wong Kim Ark does NOT apply to the issue of Obama’s ineligibility. The 14th amendment did NOT change the requirements of the Constitution with regard to NATURAL BORN citizenship. It addressed common citizenship. Read the extensive comments at the WTPOTUS blog for clarification. Please don’t just cut and paste someone else’s incorrect arguments.

---

You are entitled to your personal opinion on that however in one of the 72 already adjudicated lawsuits that have challenged Barack Obama’s eligibility, the Court of Appeals of the state of Indiana ruled (and I quote their decision)
“Based on the language of Article II, Section I, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude the persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section I purposes regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—
Ankeny et.al v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22488868/ANKENY-v-GOVERNOR-OF-THE-STATE-OF-INDIANA-APPEALS-COURT-OPINION-11120903

To date, no other state or federal court has ruled otherwise.

[Forty-Niner]

“Based on the language of Article II, Section I, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude the persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born citizens” for Article II, Section I purposes regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—
Ankeny et.al v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels.”

Still posting that tripe huh Jamese?

We all know that that discredited decision contradicted itself in note 14....

You sir, are a serial liar!

Begone Troll!

[Greenperson]

You cite a ruling from a STATE court as the last word on this issue? And here I thought the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the Constitution. Now that you’ve set us straight—that it’s actually the Indiana appeals court that determines what the Constitution means—I’ll have to rethink everything.