Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thank You.....from Delaware
Self ^ | 11/03/10 | exit82

Posted on 11/03/2010 8:08:40 AM PDT by exit82

Fellow Freepers,

I want to humbly thank you for the support you gave to Christine O'Donnell here in Delaware.

So many of you gave money, prayers and moral support as we here tried to break the Democrat hold on the good people of Delaware.

Today, you will hear stories about Christine--about what a poor candidate she was, how Mike Castle was the better choice and a guaranteed win in DE for the GOP, and that she ran a poor campaign.

Believe NONE of it. I had the distinct pleasure of meeting and talking with Christine numerous times during this campaign as Mrs.exit82 and I attended various campaign events.

I heard with my own ears what she stood for, what she would do in the Senate, especially in the lame duck session. I saw her interact with all kinds of people, even those opposed to her. I saw her stand up for the unborn, for the Constitution, for fiscal sanity, for repealing Obamacare, for upholding conservative principles.

I also know that Mike Castle would NOT have won Delaware. The Democrats would not have elected a faux Democrat when they could have voted for a real one in Coons. Obama and Biden would never have come here to help Mike Castle.

As far as running a poor campaign, I don't think so. She had a little more than eight weeks to ramp up an organization, from a shoe-string in the primary, all in the face of no help from her own party in the beginning, and the media onslaught against her.

After all, why discuss issues when we can discuss dabbling in witchcraft 25 years ago, whether she paid her bills, whether she believes in evolution or not.

In the end, it was not enough. The braindead people in Northern Delaware, who had their property taxes raised by Coons three times, over 50%, just couldn't resist pulling the "D" lever one more time.

Christine O'Donnell has guts. She took the hits and did her best. Her defeat of Mike Castle changed Delaware politics forever.

Anyway, no doubt she will be analyzed and criticized and joked about ad infinitum.

However, to me, she is me. And I am proud of her. She helped change the landscape across the country by sticking to her principles.

The purpose of this post is just to say "thank you" to all you Freepers that helped in any way to get her elected. You buoyed our efforts, knowing there were folks all over pulling for us.

Freepers are the best people on the planet. I have been one since late 1998, and I have seen that over and over.

Words are inadequate, but I hope you all know how much I, and we here in Delaware, appreciate all of YOUR efforts on behalf of our little state.

This was one battle, not the war.Our country is worth fighting for, and I sincerely hope Christine will once again be in the fight for all of us.

Thank you, Freepers. You are the best.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: christine; delaware; freepers; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-147 last
To: HospiceNurse
Did she win? Did she even have a college degree then? Had she ever held a significant elected office then? She is cute though.

Isn't Christine O'Donnell a practicing attorney? So how could she not have a college education in 2008?

When I played football and the smallest guy on the team got the ball we ran and we blocked and we fought for his success. We didn't set up a trifecta of opposition from fans, cheerleaders and teammates. O'Donnell had to defeat not only her opponent but the Republican Party, the media and people like you.

I've read other comments about how she wasn't vetted and how she was a weak candidate, etc. bla, bla, bla. BS. BS. BS.

She stepped up where none of her detractors were willing to go. She may or may not have been the smallest kid on the team but no matter. If you spent your time throwing stones as she tried to advance the ball for our team, instead of bleeding from your eyes and ears for her if necessary, you should just slink away in shame with Rove and the rest of the establishment, back-stabbing pieces of crap. I don't need teammates who tackle their own players.

The Dems even stood behind criminals such as Charlie Rangel. The GOP should have done nothing less than a media full-court-press on her behalf. That they didn't tells me a lot about who my enemies are.

101 posted on 11/03/2010 12:16:32 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
The GOP establishment and the Rino bullies want their kind of Republicans elected. High class, blue blood, wealthy types who believe in consensus and cocktail parties, and very little else. The Frums, Brooks, Noonans, and Parker people are who I am taking about. These types of Republicans will be what the Democrats wish them to be, and they will field a gang of fourteen on cue, vote for horrible legislation, and endorse Obama’s judicial abominations.

Christine wasn't that type of Republican. Mark Kirk is, and aren't we so glad he is coming to our side? This is not about Alexi whatshisname and the premise of choosing Kirk because he might vote with us every other Christmas. It is about the type of Republican that the Rino establishment and their toadies expect us to routinely nominate for important races from the presidency on down. How did John McCain work out? Bob Dole? Gerald Ford?

Christine fought the good fight. There are people here who are just so happy and giddy she lost. They can't even stay off a thread where people are commiserating after a loss. They have to show up and pound on a defeated lady who did her best so they can celebrate the election of Chris Coons.

These so called Freepers are all over, insulting and bashing O'Donnell and congratulating themselves over the election of Coons simply because Delaware didn't listen to them and nominate the equally despicable Michael Castle.

Congratulations, Christine. You stole our hearts, at least those of us who have one.

102 posted on 11/03/2010 12:45:18 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
Isn't Christine O'Donnell a practicing attorney? So how could she not have a college education in 2008?

She is not now nor has she ever been an attorney. She only recently acquired a degree in english following summer remediation. She is cutely conservative. That is her only qualification.

103 posted on 11/03/2010 12:53:12 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: exit82

We supported her, too, with money and prayers. She was an excellent candidate and outshone Coons in the debate we saw. No wonder he backed out of the last two! Tell her to keep the faith: we need more like her!


104 posted on 11/03/2010 2:00:49 PM PDT by Wife of D28Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I’ve wondered the same thing about the people in DE. But, then I have to realize this state elected the doofus Joe Biden for 30 years. I know we’re all Americans, but, come on —— what part of marxism don’t they understand? Or are they so thrilled to see a D beside someone’s name, that they are blind to issues?

No one will ever convince me that harry reid didn’t steal that election in NV. I refuse to capitalize his pukey name. His son lost, and yet he won? Something stinks to high heaven there.


105 posted on 11/03/2010 2:12:35 PM PDT by Catsrus (Have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
She is not now nor has she ever been an attorney. She only recently acquired a degree in english following summer remediation. She is cutely conservative. That is her only qualification.

My mistake. I misunderstood something I read. Nevertheless, she's the only one who stepped up and she was savaged from all sides. I think she did a commendable job.

I have a Ph.D. in physics but I can't be the only person in America that believes that schooling isn't the measure of a person.

106 posted on 11/03/2010 2:49:27 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty; HospiceNurse; Jim Robinson

“She was unqualified and unprepared to be Senator. Why not EARN a senate shot by working your way up through the state house. She IS cute though.”

EARN a senate shot by becoming a career politician? Did you really just say that?

****************************

HospiceNurse (think about the moniker) is merely a troll, of the variety the PUMAs would call an “Eeyore”. Negative and defeatist, steady as a water drip and charming as mold.

One to ignore, IMO.


107 posted on 11/03/2010 2:54:28 PM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
I have a Ph.D. in physics but I can't be the only person in America that believes that schooling isn't the measure of a person

Schooling isn't "THE" measure of a person. I agree.

Would you agree that schooling is one measure of a candidate for a job?

Would you agree that experience is a measure of a candidate for a job?

Would you be surprised that someone with a remediated english degree could not name a single supreme court decision?

Do we hire someone simply because they are the only applicant to apply [to pilot our plane?]; [to perform our surgery?]; [to craft our laws?].

We might as well hire a community organizer to command our troops.

108 posted on 11/03/2010 2:59:35 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Thanks for the personal attack.


109 posted on 11/03/2010 3:00:40 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
Why not EARN a senate shot...

She did - she won her primary.

I was angry she lost due to RINO elitist sabotage.

110 posted on 11/03/2010 3:03:06 PM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

Happy to oblige. It is called “defense of others”.


111 posted on 11/03/2010 3:05:19 PM PDT by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

“We might as well hire a community organizer to command our troops.”

SNAP!


112 posted on 11/03/2010 3:08:34 PM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: fml
I was angry she lost due to RINO elitist sabotage

When you hire someone with a loser resume, please do NOT be surprised when they lose. Rove was right again. I remember when FR loved Rove.

113 posted on 11/03/2010 3:08:34 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

You are correct. O’Donnell’s degree is in Communications.

She has claimed in debates to be a Costitutional expert, citing a “fellowship with the Claremont Institute.”

Actually, the Claremont Institute is a conservative think-tank, and her “fellowship” lasted all of seven days. I think the word “seminar” would be more appropriate.


114 posted on 11/03/2010 3:20:26 PM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Warthog-2

I had a post published by the Claremont institute. Unfortunately it is in my real name and I wouldn’t want to reference it directly here.

I don’t understand why many freepers refuse to ask as much of their candidates as they do their plumbers.


115 posted on 11/03/2010 3:26:54 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

I don’t either.

Sometimes they bite off their nose to spite their face.


116 posted on 11/03/2010 3:32:23 PM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
Loser resume?

Throwing out sophmoric accusations is the elitist thing to do....you wear it well

117 posted on 11/03/2010 3:36:50 PM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: fml
Loser resume?

She has always lost previous elections, as documented on her resume. Give me a more accurate description and I will use it.

She IS cutely conservative. I see her as our Katie Couric!

118 posted on 11/03/2010 3:40:56 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

“You stole our hearts, at least those of us who have one.”

So, it’s all about the emotion?


119 posted on 11/03/2010 3:48:44 PM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
Schooling isn't "THE" measure of a person. I agree.

Would you agree that schooling is one measure of a candidate for a job?

Would you agree that experience is a measure of a candidate for a job?

Would you be surprised that someone with a remediated english degree could not name a single supreme court decision?

Do we hire someone simply because they are the only applicant to apply [to pilot our plane?]; [to perform our surgery?]; [to craft our laws?].

We might as well hire a community organizer to command our troops.

All that is besides the point. The point is GOP disloyalty to their own candidate and sniping here by others. If she were a Democrat and a serial killer every Democrat would have supported her to the end. How else did Joe Biden, the plagiarist, keep his job for 30 years?

But since you brought it up:
We do not have an unlimited pool of candidates. The GOP put up Castle. O'Donnell won against him in a primary. Effectively, the Delaware Republicans had two choices for the job and they chose her. Maybe if they had three, four or five choices they would have made a different choice.

Leftists focus on education and pedigree because they are looking for an unlimited ruler and despot. So Princeton trumps Ohio State and Law trumps English for them. I've never seen a degree such as "BA remedial" so I don't know if there is such a scale of degrees. Naturally, if you are a bluenose, you think that the degree, the school and the fraternity all matter. I guess a degree re-do matters to some people also.

Instead of degrees, conservatives look for character and honesty because we want someone who honestly holds to the Constitution and the laws of the land and who will do what they say and say what they do. We want someone who keeps promises and fights for principle.

In typical fashion, O'Donnell was asked quiz questions such as what Supreme Court decisions she would most disagree with. She could have said Dred Scott or the one that let Democrats put Japanese-Americans in concentration camps but she assumed they were talking about recent cases. I can't think of any recent decisions I find reprehensible off the top of my head. Maybe if I saw a list to jog my memory. McCain Feingold was pretty bad but remedied by whatcamacallit that got the President's shorts in a twist. Oh yeah. I just remembered. Kelo was a blow to the takings clause too.

Maybe we could have asked her to name the capitals of several countries or the ambassadors to those countries. What's the point? Perhaps we should have a spelling bee to determine who rules us. That would have eliminated Dan Quayle at least, probably Biden too. Obama would be eliminated by having to speak without a teleprompter I guess.

Or how about, instead, we ask her what she would do to improve medical care in the country or increase jobs. Or maybe she should have been asked if she thinks the Constitution is living and breathing. Or perhaps she should be asked if the Second Amendment is about an individual right. You know, something related to the job instead of an open ended question.

But, to repeat my point, if she were a Democrat they would have supported her to the ends of the earth, just as they have all their other misfits, Klan members, sexual harassers, thieves, guys who run gay whore houses out of their apartments, guys who don't pay their taxes and so on. The list is endless.

120 posted on 11/03/2010 4:03:34 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge

“I can’t think of any recent decisions I find reprehensible off the top of my head.”

Roe v. Wade, 1973.


121 posted on 11/03/2010 4:08:34 PM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: exit82
O'Donnell was the British 1st Airborne at Arnhem, and Brigade 2506 at the Bay of Pigs. She had the brass to go up against tough opposition deep in enemy territory, and then didn't get the support she needed and deserved. I salute her, and look forward to her going on to bigger and better things.

She may have lost the election, but single-handedly exposed Karl Rove for the ass clown he is, and in doing so played a key role in what's going to be a major house-cleaning at the GOP.

God bless her.

122 posted on 11/03/2010 4:09:13 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

How about the only conservative in the race? Would being honest minus a condenscending attitude and elitst conciet work for you?


123 posted on 11/03/2010 4:16:22 PM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
We do not have an unlimited pool of candidates. The GOP put up Castle. O'Donnell won against him in a primary

True. So she lost, not the republican establishment. She should stop blaming others; It is an uncoservative thing to do.

124 posted on 11/03/2010 5:11:24 PM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet; exit82

That must be very satisfying (to some extent).


125 posted on 11/03/2010 5:14:52 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse; fml; exit82; darkwing104
She has always lost previous elections, as documented on her resume.

She IS cutely conservative. I see her as our Katie Couric!

How did you survive last night's "Concern Troll" purge?

Perhaps if you behave, you can be FR's new "Murray's Mom." You've not got enough style to be the new "Dane," and you're too coherent to be the new "Willie Green."

126 posted on 11/03/2010 5:32:42 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear (Does not play well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
True. So she lost, not the republican establishment. She should stop blaming others; It is an uncoservative thing to do.

I don't know that she is blaming anyone. I am. I'm blaming all the elitist, Country Club Republicans, all our fair-weather friends and a dishonest media that has decided to play in the game wearing a referee's uniform.

We can't do much about the media but we can do something about our own team.

All the people bitching now were free to get involved with the primary process or discover the ideal candidate. All the people bitching now were free to campaign for O'Donnell or other conservatives.

Instead the establishment threw up mega-obstacles. They supported Murkowski in Alaska and Crist in Florida and they came right out of the box damning O'Donnell. I consider them the scum of the earth, lower than a dog that would throw a ball game or spy for the enemy during war time.

127 posted on 11/03/2010 5:34:41 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Please let Sen. Cornyn know this Delawarean felt disappointed by the lukewarm support from NRSC. And thank you for your support of CO’D. In case Texas decides to file a primary opponent to Cornyn, you will have my support.

We all knew it would ‘need a miracle’ for Team Christine to pull this out, but I have no doubt the GOP primary voters made the right choice.


128 posted on 11/03/2010 5:40:24 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Wife of D28Man

Thank you for your support, and yes, we do need more like her.

She is not a Hahvahd or Yaley grad—just came from normal folks like us.

She was in the arena and fought hard. No one can take that away from her.


129 posted on 11/03/2010 5:41:14 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Warthog-2
“I can’t think of any recent decisions I find reprehensible off the top of my head.”

Roe v. Wade, 1973.

Surely, you jest.

The question asked of her said "recently".

37 plus years ago is NOT recent.

Thanks for playing. See Johnnie for your consolation prize.

130 posted on 11/03/2010 5:46:22 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Amen, Joe, God bless her.

She is a solid person, and yet people, even here, cannot simply acknowledge the odds she fought against.

Having lived in NJ and DE, I know the stronghold of insanity of Dem loyalty that exists in this part of the Northeast.


131 posted on 11/03/2010 5:48:33 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
“I can’t think of any recent decisions I find reprehensible off the top of my head.”

Really? Well hopefully you will not be seeking elected office citing the Constitution as your creed any time soon.

How about Kelo vs New London 2005?

132 posted on 11/03/2010 5:49:24 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Amen, Joe, God bless her.

She is a solid person, and yet people, even here, cannot simply acknowledge the odds she fought against.

Having lived in NJ and DE, I know the stronghold of insanity of Dem loyalty that exists in this part of the Northeast.

Amen from NJ.

133 posted on 11/03/2010 5:52:00 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
“I can’t think of any recent decisions I find reprehensible off the top of my head.” Really? Well hopefully you will not be seeking elected office citing the Constitution as your creed any time soon.

How about Kelo vs New London 2005?

I mentioned Kelo. Hopefully you will not have to take a reading comprehension test anytime soon.

So to support the Constitution I have to memorize 200 years of Supreme Court decisions? Maybe I should also have to memorize quotes from the Federalist Papers or "Common Sense." Who voted you the arbiter of who is and who is not allowed to run for office? May I please, please be allowed to vote at least? Or am I barred from that too?

134 posted on 11/03/2010 6:00:30 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: exit82

>>> Thank you for your support, and yes, we do need more like her.

She did say other citizen politicians (heavy emphasis) should not be hesitant to step up, or feel afraid for the attacks on their person or on their family at the Tea Party Express rally in Wilmington.

I think we will soon know how many other brave souls will heed the call.


135 posted on 11/03/2010 6:03:39 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
Strawmen doth not a host of arguments make.

200 years is not recent. Federalist Papers and Common Sense would help. Knowing the Amendments would help also, and being able to make a coherent constitutional argument.

Bless her heart, but COD was a brick.

She was hand picked by Bill Mahr to be his on air punching bag because of her propensity to say outlandish things.

She is a perennial (rejected) candidate with dubious qualifications for high elected office.

Good on her for being the most conservative person in the race, but she had a long way to go before being ready for prime time.

136 posted on 11/03/2010 6:07:49 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Strawmen doth not a host of arguments make.

You are the one who sets up arbitrary test questions and elects yourself to judge MY qualifactions as a supporter of the Constitution based on your stupid requirements.

I simply reject you being the boss of me or having the slightest authority, intelligence or wisdom to judge me or my worthyness for office or for any other position.

I also reject your judgement about COD. Those who can but do not, must give way to those who can't but try.

137 posted on 11/03/2010 6:26:49 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: freedom_forge
And those who try but fail because they were not qualified must also bear the derision of those who mock from the sidelines.

Strawmen again. You said something about not being able to name a recent SCOTUS decision you disagreed with, and I hoped that you would not seek office saying the Constitution was your creed; not because I was setting myself up as an authority or a judge or stating that it was a requirement.

Only because you would look like a fool when someone asked about a recent SCOTUS decision that contradicted your view of the Constitution (your supposed credo and governing philosophy - as well it should be and kudos to her for saying it) and you whiffed it............

And even a 38 year old example would be better than nothing, if they asked “more recent?” say that this was a big one, and within your own lifetime should be recent enough for Constitutional issues.

But you handed out a booby prize for such a suggestion.

I see also that you posted this thread, obviously you are a bit emotionally invested. When some time passes hopefully you will see more clearly that COD had problems well beyond being asked presumably unfair or too difficult questions about the Constitution.

138 posted on 11/03/2010 6:33:43 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I make my disappointment with Cornball/NRSC known to his office(s) quite often. The last time I called to voice a concern his staffer told me that Cornball wasn’t up for re-election until ‘14 so they basically they don’t give a flip.


139 posted on 11/03/2010 6:59:18 PM PDT by Jane Long (2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
And those who try but fail because they were not qualified must also bear the derision of those who mock from the sidelines.

My point is exactly that you do not mock your own team. If your future depended on the outcome of the contest you would cheer them on and not mock them. You must not understand this standard team ethic or the point I am trying to make in the least.

Strawmen again. You said something about not being able to name a recent SCOTUS decision you disagreed with, and I hoped that you would not seek office saying the Constitution was your creed; not because I was setting myself up as an authority or a judge or stating that it was a requirement.

Obviously you are setting yourself up as a judge of who's qualified to run. I will guarandamntee you that if I got to ask you questions in front of a large audience and wanted to embarrass you I could. That, too, was my point.

Only because you would look like a fool when someone asked about a recent SCOTUS decision that contradicted your view of the Constitution (your supposed credo and governing philosophy - as well it should be and kudos to her for saying it) and you whiffed it............

In how many debates over the years have candidates been asked about recent Supreme Court decisions? Is that in the SAT pre-test or something? Don't you get it? They will ask question after question until they find one to embarrass the candidate they want to ruin. To the other they will ask softball questions. The question about recent decisions is arbitrary. They could have easily asked "what are the most pivotal decisions" or who is the ambassador to Yemin.

And I may or may not have wiffed it because I would have challenged the relevance of such questions over the relevance of my guiding philosophy. If I think slavery was wrong, is it important for me to be able to recite the case history? -- Only to the petty who are playing gotcha. Besides, to really discuss any Supreme Court case honestly requires you have some idea of the arguments on either side and both the majority and minority opinions. Few of us have time to do that including, apparently, the President, based on his stupid comments during the State of the Union speech regarding the Citizens United case that caused Alito to mouth "not true." I didn't see the media pointing out how stupid their chosen one was.

And even a 38 year old example would be better than nothing, if they asked “more recent?” say that this was a big one, and within your own lifetime should be recent enough for Constitutional issues.

True. But maybe you wouldn't be that quick on your feet. It's easy to throw stones. And throw stones the media and pundits would had COD mentioned Roe. That's exactly the trap that was being set for COD just like when she was asked about evolution and other topics intended to make her seem like a backwards moron including the "separation" question, which she got essentially correct despite the snickering by the law students and media.

But you handed out a booby prize for such a suggestion.

Wasn't me. I didn't care one way or another.

I see also that you posted this thread, obviously you are a bit emotionally invested. When some time passes hopefully you will see more clearly that COD had problems well beyond being asked presumably unfair or too difficult questions about the Constitution.

No I did not post this thread. I am invested in two things, freedom and justice. I'm positive that there could have been a better candidate than COD, than John McCain, than Bob Dole or even Obama himself. There can always be a better candidate. There could always be more ammunition, more money, more wisdom. I have only one point here. Criticizing COD in hind-site is unjust. If the point were to learn for next time then fine. But that's not the point. The point is mean pettiness and lack of any understanding whatsoever of teamwork. And, of course, the derision of those who mock from the sidelines.

140 posted on 11/03/2010 8:25:24 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; freedom_forge
How about Kelo vs New London 2005?

Maybe you outta read the whole post next time.....just sayin
141 posted on 11/04/2010 5:25:50 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (formally known as Kerretarded....I changed my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Citing Roe v. Wade, regardless of its date, would have been the mark of a true Conservative.


142 posted on 11/04/2010 10:07:49 AM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Agree 100%.


143 posted on 11/04/2010 10:10:50 AM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz—she doesn’t put out (all the way)!


144 posted on 11/04/2010 10:24:54 AM PDT by Palladin (11th Commandment: "Thou shalt not vote for a Democrat for it is an abomination.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Warthog-2
Citing Roe v. Wade, regardless of its date, would have been the mark of a true Conservative.

Well, that would have made her fall in Wolfie's little trap, now wouldn't it?

If she mentioned a decison from January 22, 1973, and the question was about a RECENT SC decision, that would have made her look foolish, and invite the inevitable follow-up comment--"I said "recent"!" from Blitzer.

Christine has stated her prolife position in her campaign literature, and in her debates. And she contrasted her position to her opponent's views.

I don't know why you persist in kicking her when she is down.

She went into the arena, she is a qualified candidate, and she did her best.

There is NO question that Mike Castle, Delaware's GOP leadership, Tokyo Rove, AND the Dems, along with the local and national media, were all out to get her.

When you have completed a grueling campaign and won a Senate seat, then YOU can talk.

145 posted on 11/04/2010 6:57:41 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Warthog-2

She should have cited Kelo, the imminent domain case.


146 posted on 11/04/2010 7:00:47 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: exit82

It all depends upon your definition of “recent” with regard to the Supreme Court. Many judicial scholars would define it as “within our lifetime”.

I am not kicking anyone; just trying to give a word of wisdom to those who would sally forth into battle totally unprepared.


147 posted on 11/05/2010 7:27:30 AM PDT by Warthog-2 (CONGRATS TO GOV. CORBETT and SENATOR TOOMEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-147 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson