Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crazy William Tell Sniper Shot
John Jacob H’s RKBA Commentary ^ | 11/03/10 | John Jacob H’s RKBA Commentary

Posted on 11/03/2010 8:48:59 PM PDT by Copernicus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: OneWingedShark

I don’t think ‘shaking’ is really common in weaponry...

I have seen the idiots that rotate a handgun to the side to somehow look tough but I haven’t seen them shaking it.

To brandish a firearm means to show, wave or point it in a manner which others find threatening.


21 posted on 11/03/2010 9:09:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Given that the guy with the watermelon is apparently an amateur special-effects guy, it is highly plausible that there was no actual shot.


22 posted on 11/03/2010 9:09:45 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

They both ought to be arrested for stupidity.


23 posted on 11/03/2010 9:11:53 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
If you look for the shootee, you will see he's heavily into amateur special effects. Witness

So, armed with a watermelon, a fireworks, and a 50 cal rifle plus a blank, you get this video.

24 posted on 11/03/2010 9:12:13 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Karl Rove: The Republican Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
Its not even that impressive of a shot, the idiot with the melon head was what - 100 meters?

100 meters with a BMG? I could probably make that shot with a 9mm but would never try with a live target (even a deer).

If the shot was 1000 meters, now we're talkin'

25 posted on 11/03/2010 9:12:18 PM PDT by voteNRA (A citizenry armed with rifles simply cannot be tyrannized)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

We’ve been scammed. The melon was blown up from the inside. If you watch the video closely you see smoke and the pieces flying apart equally in all directions. If it was a real shot there would be no smoke and in order to conserve momentum the pieces would be away from the shot.


26 posted on 11/03/2010 9:12:22 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voteNRA

What gives it away is the fingers in his ears. He’s worried about the cherry bomb about to go off on top of his head.

He’s too far away to worry about the noise from the rifle.


27 posted on 11/03/2010 9:12:23 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Agreed.

There is an actual legal definition of "brandish"

In this case, the exception falls under something like consensual experimentation or stunt work.

I wonder if the shooter had the good sense to get some legal waiver or documentation.

Or, as others have said- a gimmick to make shooters look bad.

Best regards,

28 posted on 11/03/2010 9:13:25 PM PDT by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
I think that was a special effects demo with squibs.

Very convincing, but nobody could be that stupid.

Not somebody that owns a .50, for crying out loud.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

29 posted on 11/03/2010 9:13:45 PM PDT by The Comedian (I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian
Yeah, don't they start at about $5,000? and go up?

Best regards,

30 posted on 11/03/2010 9:17:46 PM PDT by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

>I don’t think ‘shaking’ is really common in weaponry...
>
>I have seen the idiots that rotate a handgun to the side to somehow look tough but I haven’t seen them shaking it.
>
>To brandish a firearm means to show, wave or point it in a manner which others find threatening.

No, that’s a different definition; it includes “point it [firearm] in a manner which others find threatening.”
By what right do you have to change or alter definitions?
Is not that selfsame arbitrary alteration of definitions how the Supreme Court can say that “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed” REALLY means “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto *CRIMINAL* Law shall be passed”? [See Calder v. Bull; 1798] Or that the non-sale of wheat within a state by a farmer growing said wheat is interstate commerce? [Wickard v. Filburn] Or that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” REALLY MEANS “nor shall private property be taken for use, without just compensation” [Keelo v. New London]? Or that there are ‘penumbras’ and ‘emanations’ within the Constitution that forbid the Several States to enact laws protecting their unborn citizens [Roe v. Wade]?


31 posted on 11/03/2010 9:18:13 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
"What gives it away is the fingers in his ears. He’s worried about the cherry bomb about to go off on top of his head. He’s too far away to worry about the noise from the rifle."

Okay, I'm with you that its a fake. That means he is not that stupid but he ranks up there with one from the "brady bunch". The only point of the video was to make shooters look like fools.

This = HE SUCKS!

I do appreciate your attention to detail, I got worked up by the stupidity of the whole thing and didn't watch closely. Thank you for picking up the slack.

32 posted on 11/03/2010 9:20:20 PM PDT by voteNRA (A citizenry armed with rifles simply cannot be tyrannized)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
You may be right. I went back and re-played it in HD. Couple of things make this suspicious - other than the utter stupidity of doing it for real.

One, no visual signature of bullet impact on the hill behind the target. Google .50 cal shots and watch any number of them - always a big visual signature at bullet impact.

Two, no vapor trail from the barrel - big supersonic rounds often (ok, but not always) leave a visible wake. Snipers/spotters from Afghanistan have noted the effect.

33 posted on 11/03/2010 9:22:18 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Washington DC, the downsizing begins Nov 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

Notice how the pieces fly into the direction of the bullet and the smoke billows out behind him. Clearly a firecracker hidden from view exploded it.

34 posted on 11/03/2010 9:22:27 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus
Is this your blog post?

I only ask because FR is included in the "blogroll" on the site that hosts this video.

If so, I don't speak for everyone but us gun people on FR don't appreciate our home linked to things like this.

35 posted on 11/03/2010 9:28:44 PM PDT by voteNRA (A citizenry armed with rifles simply cannot be tyrannized)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
What gives it away is the fingers in his ears. He’s worried about the cherry bomb about to go off on top of his head. // He’s too far away to worry about the noise from the rifle.

Good catch. Solved.

36 posted on 11/03/2010 9:30:37 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: voteNRA
It is a blog I post here routinely.

When I post Codrea or other stuff there are usually duplicate reposts.

Best regards,

37 posted on 11/03/2010 9:31:34 PM PDT by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
So, armed with a watermelon, a fireworks, and a 50 cal rifle plus a blank, you get this video.

Oh I see, so instead of firing a .50 round at the watermelon, watermelon head played it safe, and put explosives in the melon, enough to explode the melon and send fragments of the melon 50 feet away?

Glad melon head played it safe.

38 posted on 11/03/2010 9:31:51 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

Thanks for the cordial reply, I was just wondering.


39 posted on 11/03/2010 9:33:56 PM PDT by voteNRA (A citizenry armed with rifles simply cannot be tyrannized)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: voteNRA
I usually count myself as a Gun Person, but I was shocked to recently learn of the schism between Joe Brower and myself vis a vis NRA and GOA et. al.

Best regards,

40 posted on 11/03/2010 9:34:21 PM PDT by Copernicus (California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson