Skip to comments.Huffington Post Libels Palin, Refuses to Change Story
Posted on 11/09/2010 9:37:33 AM PST by rightistight
Does this really surprise anyone? Currently, the liberal psuedo-news site the Huffington Post has a gigantic picture of former VP candidate and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and a 99 font size (and all capital letters) "GOTCHA" on the front of their website:
The picture, which intentionally tries to mock Palin, links to an article by the Huffington Post that states that Palin "misquoted" a story in the Wall Street Journal. However, if you wade through the article and past the liberal slant, you would realize that Mrs. Palin is telling the truth.
If you read the article, Palin stated that food prices increased over the last year. They did. The HuffPo cries foul, saying that the prices didn't rise that much, but obviously their lies cannot hid the fact that Palin was correct.
(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.blogspot.com ...
She looks great in that picture. Even when they try to make her look bad - she still looks good. I can see (literally) why she drives the sea hags nuts.
Funny, they try to make her look ugly. I think that picture is very pretty, lol. Huff post is stupid.
blog pimp post
Its not Arianna’s fault.
Her chef didn’t tell the senior staff prices had risen.
How could she possibly have known?
Huffington? Isn’t that the Greek woman who married a homo for money?
A person who has a good heart never looks bad, even when they “technically” look bad. That’s what those hags on the left just don’t get.
Palin vs. lamestream: the on going saga.
As I recall, following the WSJ article attacking her, Palin replied that the “reporter” who took her to task over her comments about a WSJ article apparently doesn’t read his own paper.
Palin is correct. The rest are liars and propagandists.
I take a peek at Huffington Post a couple of times a year to see what, if anything, the liberals find interesting and it’s always the same childish drivel in an unappealing format. No thanks.
“blog pimp post”
Posted in the Blogs section, right where it should be.
So who’s forcing you to read it against your will?
The lamestream never learns. Huffington just tee’d itself up for another seven-iron swat.
Contact Xerox and FedEx and ask them why they are advertising on this story and supporting the HuffPost’s vendetta against Sarah Palin.
Xerox Headquarters 1-203-968-3000
45 Glover Avenue
P.O. Box 4505
Norwalk, CT 06856-4505
United States Mon.-Fri. 8am-5pm ET.
Xerox National Phone Directory 1-800-334-6200 (US only) Mon.-Fri. 9am-8pm ET.
North America: (901) 434-8100
FedEx Corp. Investor Relations
942 South Shady Grove Road
Memphis, TN 38120
My money says that she turned him homo.
Yes, the sea-hags (especially the head sea-hag, Arianna Huffington) are just jealous of Sarah. Sarah still has a STRAIGHT, HUNK OF A HUSBAND, unlike poor Arianna!
It's worse than that, IIRC, she turned the poor man into a homo.
That’s actually a great idea, jimbo! I’ll do that right now.
The response by the WSJ reporter was that the increase was not actually significant.
Who is misquoting?
From May 19th, 2008,
"Romney Poses Bigger Threat To Obama Than McCain
The question is better asked of his GOP foe John McCain.
His vice presidential pick is far more crucial than who Obama picks."
and when McCain smartly chose Gov. Palin,
The Huffington Post featured Kathleen Parker
in her Romney-driven attacks on Gov. Palin
on the eve of Election 2008, working to throw
the election to her, and Romney's, and Huffington's
favorite: Imam Hussein Obama.
"Kathleen Parker: After Interviews, Palin Should Bow Out"
"The Huffington Post Endorses Mitt Romney"
Just more lies by the criminal gangster government that we have. How ridiculous that they, with a straight face, exclude food and energy from “core” inflation and claim prices aren’t rising. What is more impactful to people EVERY DAY than food and energy prices?
The only good thing about what she puts in print is that you can read the lies, when she talks it sounds like she has a mouth full of crap.
It’s the blog pimping that is annoying. Maybe it wasn’t your intention, but we get a lot of people here who only post a few teaser lines here as a way to drive more traffic to the blog where the real story is.
It gets bothersome to read the beginning of a story here only to find the punch line is on some other website.
I would love to know a whole lot more about this woman. As I recall she married a rich conservative guy. Conservative guy dies, she gets the money. The man is barely in the ground and Huffington abruptly becomes a lefty mouth piece.
Not sure she’s Greek, but Greece definitely lists to the portside. Anyone who’se taken the time to figure out how we have a usurping Marxist in the WH knows the left plotted more than half a century to make that happen. This plot included coopting the US Supreme Court, print/broadcast media, education, labor unions, religious leadership, financial leadership and the GOP. Perhaps she’s been part of the grand plan for a long time.
Palins Facebook friends: 2.3 Million
WSJ Circulation: 2.1 Million
Knowing that 200,000 more people read her smack down of Sudeep Reddy than read his original article: PRICELESS
She was just a naive young Greek girl.
Lets look at this whole farce objectively.
Sarah says “everyone who ever goes out shopping for groceries knows that prices have risen significantly over the past year or so
YEAR OR SO.
Now Mr. Sudeep from the WSJ says Palin didnt read the WSJ article.
Oh really Mr. Sudeep. I did.
Quote from the article, second paragraph Prices of staples including milk, beef, coffee, cocoa and sugar have risen sharply in recent months.
Risen sharply in recent months.
Now Ms. Palin said a year or so - so was she overstepping? Again Mr Sudeep, look at the graphic accompanying the article. Its BIG and easy to read. And it shows staples rising much higher from a YEAR EARLIER. So recent months and a year earlier, all from the WSJ article. And Palins quote was off?
So is the article poorly written or all over the board? If so, then that reflects on the WSJ. Or did Ms. Palin take what the article gives and correctly make a point about rising food over the last year or so regardless of what the first paragraph of the article states and what Mr. Sudeep likes to ONLY point out and that the Huff Post is laughing so hard about.
Am I missing something or wrong?
Palin generates hits for HuffPo. That’s all it is. I went there once and every other article mentioned Palin.
I find it weird that our society has a such a short memory.
This women (Huffington) either turned her own husband gay, or married him knowing he’s gay just to advance her career. And she has the nerve to criticize a super women like Palin, who raised five kids, ran for and won city council, mayor and Governor (60% approval rating) ON HER OWN (unlike Hildabeast who got where she is by sleeping with, and turning a blind eye to the accused rapist convicted liar). Yet feminist champion Hillary and “Arriana” while constantly bashing Palin. Makes me ill. GOTCHA Arianna.
“Huffington? Isnt that the Greek woman who married a homo for money?
... and she slept with Al Franken.
I mean they partner with NBC for polling, polling that allows Chucky Todd to actually have some input into the wording of the questions.
So really this idea that the WSJ is a Conservative paper is really not true, heck they employed Al Hunt for how many years??
I am open to correction on the WSJ, but that`s how I see it.
No evidence that Rupert is going to change it at all.
Huffington readers are addicted to lies! “YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!” But seriously; think about it. These people thrive on each others’ contrivances.
And with the voice that should always be singing the theme song from "Green Acres"?
She was married to a rich Republican who ran/lost in California Governor race, and then “came out” as a homosexual — they divorced and she came out with a huge chunk.
Blog hating pimpsters that complained about not doing a good sized excerpt have stopped bothering those that post a sufficient excerpt such as on this thread.
Like most big mouth lib heifers, she jealous as hell of Sarah Palin.
Like I said, I don’t mind the blogs so much.
It is not the size of the excerpt that makes me object. It is the pimping aspect of it:
HILLARY DROPS 2012 BOMBSHELL
Hillary Clinton held a press conference today and made her intentions clear. She said, (to read the rest of this story go to this link)
LOL...how ya doing Andy?
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/wal-mart-raising-prices-on-food-2010-8#ixzz14oZlFrPM
Then why did you disrupt this thread with your complaint?
Post a link to the Hilliary story, I’d like to read it!
Again, if you don’t like blogs, don’t look at the bloggers section
This is the last thing the Zombies for Zer0 want the nation to know: prices are up on food. The increase in food prices adds to the misery of high unemployment.
Only by letting the individual keep more of their money with less taxes and regulation, will we be able to climb out of this recession.
My sincere condolences on that SOB Harry Reid's re-election. Looks like he called in his chits and pulled out all the stops, because even the exit polls showed him losing. Geez, ya think HuffPo will ever investigate that? < /rhetorical question>
Of course not: they're too busy planning their next 32 hit pieces on Palin...
Congrats!! FR is lucky to have you, I for one have always appreciated your posts.
You have 'ol dingy Harry summed up perfectly, he no doubt has the power players of this State locked up tight...they certainly demonstrated they will answer to his beck and call, sigh, it's so disgusting and infuriating.
Glad to hear you're doing well, it's always a pleasure to see you here.
How’s your toenail fungus doing?
You shouldn’t waste your time reading the economics comics; the real world is a better guide.