Skip to comments.A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision
Posted on 11/29/2010 4:02:48 PM PST by STARWISE
For Immediate Release - 29 November 2010 2:30 p.m. EST
U.S. Supreme Court orders were posted at 10:00 a.m. on 29 Nov 2010. See below. Certiorari for our case was denied.
The two justices appointed by Obama who had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and case did not recuse themselves even though they should have!
Their recusal was called for in our petition on page 36.
The two justices and the court ignored that. There were recusals declared by these two Obama appointees in many other petitions including the one immediately before our petition in the orders list and the one immediately after.
IMO, apparently the court needed all nine justices in the room to kill the petition. With the full court of 9 justices it's the rule/vote of 4 to grant certiorari to move the case forward.
With two recusals that would have left only 7 justices and it's then the rule/vote of 3 to grant certiorari to move the case forward.
I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS were that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayer and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against Certiorari, and to require 4 votes to grant cert instead of 3 ... financial conflict of interest and ethics be damned by those two justices. JMHO.
10-446 KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision
The "Roberts Court" of the U.S. Supreme Court in my opinion will be known in history as the Neville Chamberlain supreme court, the great Obama appeaser court.
Appeasement due to fear that some immediate small amount of veiled and threatened violence from the far left Saul Alinsky goons and tyrants and bullies, and thus not doing the right thing early only to support the rule of law and the Constitution, ultimately leads to be much bigger problems later.
History has shown us that over and over. This matter should have been addressed by the media and political parties early in the spring of 2008 during the primaries. It wasn't.
Congress should have addressed this when asked and when constitutionally it was required to. It didn't.
The courts should have addressed the merits of the questions when appealed to early on. They didn't.
Everyone in our system of government chose ignoring the problem and appeasement over confrontation and punted the ball to someone else. Now it is far worse.
The Supreme Court has chosen appeasement and inaction over action and dealing with the issue and questions openly in a court of law under the rules of evidence and law. Our constitutional republic and legal system is now compromised and broken.
And it will only get worse as our legal system and constitutional republic further deteriorates and the rule of law gives way more and more to appeasement of bullies such as Obama and his far left cronies and puppet masters.
Appeasement of the constitutional usurpers will not make it go away. It will only delay the inevitable and fester and grow and in the end be a far worse situation to deal with when the real nature of the tyrant reveals himself in a much bolder way and attempts to take away all our protections to our unalienable rights and liberty.
Neville Chamberlain tactics never work with bullies, alinskyites, tyrants, and national socialists.
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama et al
Court docs - Pg. 15
KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to
file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
writ of certiorari is denied.
This nation is in 4 stage cancer & now we have ObamaCare.
I had no idea Mr. Kerchner was that delusional. There is no way the conservative Justices would have participated in undoing a 2 year old election. That would be the worst type of judicial activism.
The judiciary is totally corrupt like the rest of the country.
Not even if the constitution was at stake?
>> I had no idea Mr. Kerchner was that delusional <<
Hey, to paraphrase Madame Babs Boxer, please don’t call him “Mr.”
Please call him “CDR” — since you can be sure he worked hard to get that title.
Yep. The pics prove that John Roberts is a pal of 0bama. Come to think of it, I saw a pic of Sarah Palin shaking Joe Biden’s hand. That must mean that she’s in on it too.
First person to quote Vattel gets a tinfoil hat.
Heaven help us. It would appear that most in the government ‘ruling class’ are spineless cowards now!
In November of 2008 (at the same time that Obama was elected) Fremont, Nebraska voters passed an ordinance requiring landlords to verify the legal residency status of prospective renters before renting to them.
The ACLU has filed a lawsuit asking the courts to undo that election. The court has not in any way balked at that request. A stay was issued immediately to keep that ordinance from going into effect and the parties have until this coming January to get their arguments in line.
Just like the judge in Oklahoma issued a stay until the court decides whether to overturn the voters’ will in their anti-sharia Constitutional amendment.
Just like the NE Supreme Court overturned the will of the voters on Nebraska’s Constitutional amendment disallowing the forced consolidation of schools.
Just as the courts have overturned the will of Iowa and California voters who amended their Constitutions to disallow gay marriage.
Now, were you saying something about a court not being willing to overturn the results of an election? Wherever are you getting that idea from?
If seeing isn’t believing...these are photos of a Coup d’état. And our constituional republic went down not even with a whimper. Time to move to Switzerland, at least their citizens are defending their sovereignty.
Well heck, I didn't know there was a 2 year statute of limitations on having disregarded the constitution and constitutional matters.
Damn, you learn something new every day. (/sarcasm)
>> First person to quote Vattel gets a tinfoil hat. <<
“Nihil est enim illi principi Deo qui omnem hunc mundum regit, quod quidem in terris fiat, acceptium, quam concilia coestusque hominum jure sociati, quæ civitates appellantur.”
However, grounds for impeachment does not necessarily mean there exists courage to impeach.
In January, Speaker Boehner will have the power to at least create a House committee to investigate impeachment. That committee will have the power to subpena any documents that may be necessary to prove whether or not Obama is constitutionally qualified to be president.
So, how this whole mess gets resolved will be decided by Speaker Boehner. The courts have made it clear that they are not interested in the issue.
Are you listening, Speaker Boehner?
Yeah .. CNN reports NOTHING about facts/background
of these cases, but reports on the others and today’s
denial of cert, as Cdr Kerchner noted this am. Not too
transparent or anything ............/S!
Now that we’ve been denied CNN covers the case ...
November 29, 2010 8:21 AM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.