Posted on 12/18/2010 4:14:32 PM PST by JLWORK
Placemark.
“The sanctions order specifies exactly what she was sanctioned for: accusing the judge of “treason” (that’s called “contempt of court,” for those of you following along at home), and accusing the judge of meeting with Attorney General Holder in a coffee shop across the street from the courthouse in Georgia (on a day when Holder was appearing publicly in Los Angeles).”
Got a link to the sanctions order?
Best,
John
Disregard the prior request for a link to the sanction order. I found it. Thanks.
JW
Here’s the link to Land’s sanction order against Taitz.
http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/PDF/PDF%20Archive/Order_denying_motion_for_recusal.pdf
You can read it for yourselves and see if you detect any hostility against or derision toward Taitz from the Court.
I agree with Lurking Libertarian - probably no grant of certiorari in this case. Would like to see the transcript of her alleged accusation of treason against the Court. Yes - that would indeed be contemptuous of her.
Thanks, Lurking Libertarian, for your comments.
JW
Would like to see the transcript of her alleged accusation of treason against the Court. Yes - that would indeed be contemptuous of her.
Check page 5 of the following and see what you think. I don’t know if this is what the judge is referring to or not.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19939482/Motion-of-Consideration-by-Orly-Taitz-91709
I don’t know, either, but I’ll bet the Court was not particularly pleased to read this page of the filing. From the Judge’s ruling, I thought she made the accusation while addressing the Court - but you could have it right here.
Thanks for the research. Think she’ll get her money back?
John
I don’t know, either, but I’ll bet the Court was not particularly pleased to read this page of the filing. From the Judge’s ruling, I thought she made the accusation while addressing the Court - but you could have it right here.
Thanks for the research. Think she’ll get her money back?
John
I have some questions about this SS number mystery:
As regards the SS number that was issued to Obama and which is alleged to have been previously been issued to some other fellow, how old was Obama when he was issued this SS number? Is it felt by those investigating this mystery that when Obama was issued this number, he had, because of his position or station in life, the power to control what number he was issued by the SS Administration? Is there some sensible theory as to why Obama (or anyone else) would have wanted Obama to be issued the same SS number that had been previously issued to someone in a different state? What is this SS number and to whom (name) was it previously issued?
IOW, does any of this make any sense to anyone who possesses any common sense? Finally, is it possible that an investigator found a document that by simple human error erroneously associates Obama with the SS number for somebody else?
Truther???????
Right there you are posting TWO lies, and that’s because you sure are a true CON-MAN!!!
The words he is speaking before the arrest indicates clearly that he is right that our government is totally corrupt and here comes Julian Assange to mind??
You may have forgotten that we had "flight students" here in Florida that the government knew about. And also Jamie Gorelich, Holder(?) erected a wall between FBI/CIA to protect Clinton. Remember Berger was sent out to white-wash Clinton's archives before the 9/11 commission hearing???
Sure in your eyes NO corruption here, "let us just move on" to keep your dear Fuehrer in office at any cost, and to heck with the CONSTITUTION, and the civil rights, hmmmm!!!
Buzzkill.
Be careful asking those kinds of questions on eligibility threads. You're liable to get yourself labeled as an Obot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.