Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snubbed: No Obamas at Britainís Royal Wedding
Pajamas Media ^ | December 21, 2010 | Belladonna Rogers

Posted on 12/21/2010 11:41:31 AM PST by Kaslin

Barack and Michelle earn themselves a tempest in a Wedgwood teapot.

Last week the Daily Mail reported that President and Mrs. Obama will not be among the 2,000 invited to Westminster Abbey on April 29, 2011, to attend the wedding of Prince William, the older son of Prince Charles and the late Princess Diana. This news has caused the proverbial tempest in a teapot. How could this snub have come about?

One might well ask, how could this snub not have come about?

Let’s take a brief stroll down memory lane, shall we? Not two weeks into his presidency, Mr. Obama boorishly returned the bust of Sir Winston Churchill to the British ambassador in Washington. Talk about clueless.

Britain and the U.S. were the staunchest of allies since the American entry into World War II on December 7, 1941. Not only was Winston Churchill a courageous wartime partner of FDR, the British leader was later awarded an honorary American citizenship on April 9, 1963 — by John F. Kennedy, who described him as “the most honored and honorable man to walk the stage of human history in the time in which we live. Whenever and wherever tyranny threatened, he has always championed liberty [...] he mobilized the English language and sent it into battle[.]” It is true that Barack Obama was four months shy of his second birthday when Kennedy spoke those words, but the facts are available for him to learn, if not remember.

While 4,500 brave American servicemen and women have given their lives in Iraq during his own adulthood — indeed, partly during his own presidency — 519 valiant British military men and women have died in combat in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars: far more than from any other ally of the United States.

Under these circumstances, what should Obama have done if he didn’t want the bust of Churchill in the Oval Office? Simple answer to simple question: store it in the basement. Or the attic. Who among us has not received house presents that don’t comport with our taste or interests? What do we do when we know the friends who gave us the gifts will visit us again? We take them out of the basement or attic and have them sitting in our living rooms as if they were there from the time our friends left. We don’t have to look at the gift every day, and the friend is none the wiser when he or she returns for another visit.

The one thing no one with any common sense does is make a big deal about returning the present, or, in this case, the loan. And it wasn’t a present or loan to either George W. Bush or to Barack Obama. It was a loan to the people of the United States of America. Prime Minister Tony Blair had given the bust to President George W. Bush as a show of solidarity in the aftermath of 9/11 — as an inspiration to the president in a time of mourning and difficulty for the United States. Blair wanted the American people to know that the British people stood foursquare with them.

No matter all that for President Obama. When the president sent Churchill packing, Newsweek opined,

Maybe it’s no surprise that Obama wouldn’t want Churchill watching over his shoulder. After all, it was Churchill who, in 1952, ordered a crackdown on the Mau Mau rebellion against British colonial rule in Kenya, Obama’s ancestral homeland. Obama’s grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was labeled a subversive during the uprising and spent months in detention.

But as the president has apparently yet to learn, not everything is about him. If Newsweek’s supposition is correct, he should have moved the bust to another location in the White House, but kept it available for visits from future British prime ministers, the British ambassador, and other UK bigwigs.

From the get-go, our president has failed to absorb one simple fact: the person working in a Washington office that happens to be designed in the shape of an oval is not just Barry Obama, with his Hyde Park, Morningside Heights, and Cambridge 02138 perspectives, provincial and blinkered. When he walks into the Oval Office, he’s the president of the United States of America — not just Blue America or academia.

Another bump on the road to good relations with our closest and most reliable ally came only a month after Obama’s needless return of the Churchill bust. The UK’s newly elected prime minister, blind in one eye and not known as a film buff, arrived for a state visit to Washington, bearing a gift of “an ornamental pen holder made from the timbers of the Victorian anti-slave ship H.M.S. Gannet. The unique present delighted Mr. Obama,” according to the Daily Mail, “because oak from the Gannet’s sister ship, H.M.S. Resolute, was carved to make a desk that has sat in the Oval Office in the White House since 1880.” Prime Minister Brown, added the Mail, “also handed over a framed commission for H.M.S. Resolute and a first edition of the seven-volume biography of Churchill by Sir Martin Gilbert. In addition, Mr. Brown and his wife showered gifts on the Obama children, giving Sasha and Malia an outfit each from Topshop and six children’s books by British authors which are shortly to be published in America.”

And what did the Browns get in return? Two models of Marine One, the presidential helicopter (gifts of which there are obviously a closetful at the White House) and 25 DVDs of American films, available at any Walmart or Target — and, as it happened, unplayable on DVD players in Britain. Not exactly an even exchange.

Leaving aside the political considerations, this is plain bad manners. It delivers the message, “We’re important and you’re not. We don’t even have to pretend to treat you as an equal.”

And the following month, April 2009, in a third consecutive faux pas, our president and his wife paid a state visit to Buckingham Palace, bringing as a gift for the queen…an iPod. It was loaded with videos of the queen’s trip to Virginia two years earlier. Here again, the president failed to do his homework, or even assign the homework to someone else to do. Queen Elizabeth, as it turned out, already had an iPod, a 6 GB silver Mini version she bought in 2005 at the suggestion of her son, Prince Andrew.

Most of us, if we aren’t sure whether a friend already owns a gift we’re thinking of giving, might ask the friend whether he or she already has the item we had in mind. But the president doesn’t even have to do this. He can get the Protocol Office of the White House to find out for him. This is what’s known as one of the perquisites of office. But you have to know to ask. You have to think to ask.

This is one reason presidents often appoint long-time Washington hands to a position in the White House: not for their sheer brilliance, but to help the president avoid rookie mistakes that only serve to make him, and the people he represents, look foolish, incompetent, and provincial.

Not Obama. His White House posse was pure Chicagoland. No old Washington hands for him. So he ended up giving the queen of England something she already had. Tacky. Tacky and avoidable.

Bottom line: rudeness and a lack of consideration for others exact a price in the real world. If it’s a state event, then the president of the United States will be invited, not because he’s Barack Obama, but because Barack Obama is the president of the United States. And if it’s a private event, such as the wedding of the man who (if the monarchy survives) will one day be king of England, Michelle and Barack Obama will be excluded, not because of the color of their skins but because of the content of their characters: inconsiderate, boorish, and rude.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: boorish; inconsiderate; liberals; queen; rude

1 posted on 12/21/2010 11:41:32 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...the Clampetts didn't get an invite...
2 posted on 12/21/2010 11:43:24 AM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Obamas can even make a royal wedding in another country “all about them.”

What pathetic tools.


3 posted on 12/21/2010 11:44:58 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Dear Obamas,

This is payback for those damned DVDs we never could get to play.

Signed,
The Brits


4 posted on 12/21/2010 11:45:01 AM PST by bigbob (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yeah, well they probably didn’t want an iPod filled with Obama speeches for a wedding present, like his Grand Mother received as a gift.


5 posted on 12/21/2010 11:45:30 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The last four words of the article sum it up nicely. After all, it’s not as if the Royal Family were as important to Obama as, say, the King of Saudi Arabia.


6 posted on 12/21/2010 11:46:04 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Brits must not like liars and commies.


7 posted on 12/21/2010 11:46:52 AM PST by devistate one four ( jihad is a 2 way street! Kimber CDP II .45 OORAH! TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

After the way Obama crapped all over the UK, I wouldn’t invite that Kenyan anywhere near the royals.


8 posted on 12/21/2010 11:47:12 AM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ghetto isn’t only a place, it’s a state of mind. Good for the Brits for putting up the “No ghetto garbage allowed” sign up for the royal wedding.


9 posted on 12/21/2010 11:49:07 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin
President and Mrs. Obama will not be among the 2,000 invited to Westminster Abbey on April 29
But they are on the list of alternates in the event that the guest list gets increased to 3,000. They just didn't make the cut in the first 2,000.

/s

12 posted on 12/21/2010 11:52:15 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t think this ‘snub’ bothers the First couple in the slightest.

Since they would have to attend a boring wedding, why go?

IMHO, the reason they weren’t invited was because they made it clear they weren’t interested in going.


13 posted on 12/21/2010 11:52:49 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

It would be my pleasure to represent the States
and to show the lucky bride around the dance floor...


14 posted on 12/21/2010 11:55:25 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Was Reagan invited to the wedding when those other people got married in 1980 or ‘81?


15 posted on 12/21/2010 11:56:29 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Brits know what we do. The Obama’s are trash. One does not associate with trash.


16 posted on 12/21/2010 11:57:06 AM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

and anyway, they don’t even know what WEDGEWOOD is, so there! ;)


17 posted on 12/21/2010 11:59:04 AM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT ( JC Webster's fav words: "the boiling pits of sewage" roflmao)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If I was Obama, I would be so glad to not be invited!


18 posted on 12/21/2010 11:59:28 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

His behavior can be summed up in one word: Narcissistic.


19 posted on 12/21/2010 12:02:34 PM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good for the Brits!

Unfortunately, BO won’t only not be offended, he’s probably glad.


20 posted on 12/21/2010 12:05:12 PM PST by proud American in Canada (To paraphrase Sarah Palin: I love when the liberals get all wee-wee'd up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Personally, I’d rather go to a good Polish or Italian wedding down at the local Fire Hall than this overblown extravaganza. I bet these Royals won’t even have any pigs in the blanket, rigatoni or grandma Liz’s home made pizzelles. ;~))


21 posted on 12/21/2010 12:13:09 PM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Please let them come over there keep them. I live for the damn day when that a**hole isn’t in the WH.


22 posted on 12/21/2010 12:14:32 PM PST by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
President Reagan was busy that day. Executive Order 12315 -- Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised Edition) and Remarks and Question-and-Answer Session With Reporters Following Congressional Action on Federal Tax Reduction Legislation .

But Nancy was there, so I'm going to guess he was invited.

23 posted on 12/21/2010 12:15:50 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good for our British Friends in giving Imam Oamah & UK Hater the middle-finger!


24 posted on 12/21/2010 12:17:11 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

“I don’t think this ‘snub’ bothers the First couple in the slightest.”

Oh, don’t kid yourself. It bothers them. Just like the drubbing in November “didn’t bother him”. Ha! In a pig’s eye! (Which he couldn’t conceal, but tried at first.)


25 posted on 12/21/2010 12:26:13 PM PST by Twinkie (SHOOT LOW BOYS, THEY'RE RIDING SHETLAND PONIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I would rather get a massage with a cheese grater than go to that wedding.


26 posted on 12/21/2010 12:26:13 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Then can I have your invitation?


27 posted on 12/21/2010 12:28:59 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ √ě)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
"Unfortunately, BO won’t only not be offended, he’s probably glad.

True, but won't he just hate every media outlet saying he has been snubbed! It's all about Barry.

28 posted on 12/21/2010 12:37:19 PM PST by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is good news but I can’t wait until 2012.


29 posted on 12/21/2010 12:37:48 PM PST by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Clampets, for sure.

Obama was delighted to get the item from the Gannet because it was a sister of the Resolute. That explains why there are so many pictures of Barry with his feet all over the Resolute desk. I wonder if pictures of BoBo with his number fourteens all over that desk didn’t further enrage the Royal family.

The Resolute desk was a gift from Queen Victory to President Pierce. It bears a plate with, in part, the following:

H.M.S Resolute ...

The ship was purchased, fitted out and sent to England as a gift to HER MAJESTY QUEEN VICTORIA by the PRESIDENT AND PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES as a token of goodwill & friendship. This table was made from her timbers when she was broken up, and is presented by the QUEEN OF GREAT BRITAIN to the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES as a memorial of the courtesy and loving kindness which dictated the offer of the gift of the RESOLUTE.

Given that plate and Obama’s obvious dislike for Great Britain, I have to wonder why he put it back in the Oval office. This is truly a classless person.

Nancy went to the last big royal wedding, but Ronaldus Magnus did not. He was recovering from an assignation attempt.

The NappyOne


30 posted on 12/21/2010 12:47:25 PM PST by NappyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NappyOne

31 posted on 12/21/2010 1:12:06 PM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does the Race Card work in the UK?


32 posted on 12/21/2010 1:17:58 PM PST by Haiku Guy (What we've got here is ... failure to communicate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Since Barack Obama is a British Subject by birth, maybe there is some kind of protocoligorical reason why he cannot be invited to the Royal Wedding...
33 posted on 12/21/2010 1:23:11 PM PST by Haiku Guy (What we've got here is ... failure to communicate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
The Clampetts might have been somewhat uncultured, but not deliberately rude to our closest ally. We'd have been far better off with the Clampetts in the WH.
34 posted on 12/21/2010 1:25:20 PM PST by libstripper (uite eff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Sorry 'bout sticking a needle into the glee, but the upcoming wedding isn't like Charles and Diana's. Prince William isn't the heir to the throne, so it doesn't count as a state wedding. Price Charles' nuptuals did because he was (and still is) the Crown Prince. 100 of the invites are being distributed by ballot; that is not done for a state wedding.

In this case, excluding relatives and any reciprocation in the foreign-royal circuit, protocol dictates giving the nod to ordinary subjects - giving them the treat of a lifetime. President Obama doesn't exactly count as a drinking buddy of Prince William - they'll get invites no matter what - and Michelle isn't one of Kate Middleton's BFFs, so she doesn't qualify on the old-friend count either.

As for the treat-of-a-lifetime slot, I think it would me more of a snub for the Obamas to have been invited than not.

35 posted on 12/21/2010 1:26:47 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy
Yes, and protocoligorical is a word.

If it's good enough for William Daniels playing John Adams, it's good enough for me!

36 posted on 12/21/2010 1:27:29 PM PST by Haiku Guy (What we've got here is ... failure to communicate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

unless it was to polish the silver (with supervision) I wouldn’t want the community organizer and his shelf ass ugly angry wife either/


37 posted on 12/21/2010 1:36:00 PM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I believe they also broke protocol by touching the Queen or something ...But I think the reporter is onto something... the young prince and his bride, to be, were probably afraid the US first couple would give them a salad spinner as a wedding gift

I am so embarrassed for our country

38 posted on 12/21/2010 1:53:07 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Personally, I’d rather go to a good Polish or Italian wedding down at the local Fire Hall than this overblown extravaganza. I bet these Royals won’t even have any pigs in the blanket, rigatoni or grandma Liz’s home made pizzelles. ;~))

Me too..BUT this is a real message to the President and spouse.. you guys are trailer park trash

39 posted on 12/21/2010 1:59:54 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, Reagan was invited, but he was not well enough to go following the assassination attempt, so Nancy went alone.


40 posted on 12/21/2010 2:01:27 PM PST by Bookwoman ("...and I am unanimous in this...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I don’t think this ‘snub’ bothers the First couple in the slightest.

Don't kid yourself ... they would have loved to go..and take the kids . It would have been another first, a black US president attends a royal wedding..Michelle could have bought another expensive, ugly dress to put in their "library " in Chicago some day

I am sure they will blame this on pure racism

41 posted on 12/21/2010 2:03:56 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

I’d love to get an invitation to the wedding. My five years of service in the UK made me a real Anglophile. Seeing Prince Harry in BDU in Iraq and Prince William flying around in his chopper shows that these guys aren’t your typical limp-wristed Eurotrash royalty. If I WERE invited, I’d demand that they have a couple of kegs of Younger’s Tartan Bitter or Theakston’s Old Peculiar on hand.


42 posted on 12/21/2010 2:54:52 PM PST by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson