Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The repeal of DADT from a retired Senior NCO’s Point of View
Coach is Right ^ | December 26th, 2010 | Jim Emerson, staff writer

Posted on 12/26/2010 10:40:12 AM PST by darkwing104

On December 22 Barack Obama signed into law the repeal of the “Don’t Ask Don’t tell Policy” (DADT) starting the process to eliminate the military’s ban on openly gay troops. Even though the law is in effect, the complete removal of certain personal conduct provisions in the UCMJ will take time, but the end of DADT is here.

Survey

The So-called survey used to justify this change was a joke. It was nothing more than a con job to sell the American people the concept of allowing gays to openly serve in our military. What the pundits won’t tell you is that the majority (66%) of the military either does not want this change or refused to answer the survey. Of the troops that responded approximately 36% planned on leaving military service rather than deal with openly gay members.

Forty eight percent of Marines responded that they will consider leaving the Corps earlier than planned.

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: dadt; fdrq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Now for the facts the LiberalPress isn't reporting.


1 posted on 12/26/2010 10:40:14 AM PST by darkwing104
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Of course the media is not going to tell the truth. I think that people will wait to get out until the economy improves though. I think that the military will have a hard time with retention in four years (approx time for the economy to get back to normal). With the GI Bill, everyone can now go to school which is another thing that will keep retention low (later on).


2 posted on 12/26/2010 10:51:13 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Dems would be thrilled to see large scale resignations and one tour and out enlistments.

First, it would decimate our ability to fight on more than one front.
Second, it would virtually assure a return to the draft and the short terms of service that it would bring back with it.

3 posted on 12/26/2010 10:55:34 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton
it would virtually assure a return to the draft and the short terms of service that it would bring back with it.

According to some who are better informed than I am, the return of the draft is one of the intermediate goals. Of course the ultimate goal is the transformation of our Armed Forces into ineffective obedient lap dogs.

4 posted on 12/26/2010 11:04:17 AM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

I think a draft would be good. Elections have consequences. Also, it takes a while, but even a short term enlistment has the potential to create a conservative in the long run. When men look back on their lives the time spent on active duty comes to mind first, and most are very proud of it, even if at the time they were less than pleased.


5 posted on 12/26/2010 11:09:26 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Could it possibly be that obama is trying to turn the military overwhelmly liberal, then he'll have that "army" he hints about to help him take over America by force.

There has been a lot of rumbling about it, but no one wants to see the elephant in the living room...obama wants to be and all-powerful dictator...it's his nature. Do what he wants, take what he wants, and silence anyone who disagrees...he's almost there without a military, but there are those pesky conservative holdouts with their guns and Bibles standing in the way.
6 posted on 12/26/2010 11:19:53 AM PST by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Well, great. A huge number of people leave the service and Barry comes up with an "aggressive program" to entice those he thinks should be in the military to enlist. He won't have to build the "civilian service as large and well funded as the military". He'll just fill the military with supporters of his totalitarian rule and go from there.

A lot of conservatives and independents blather about how we shouldn't put social issues on the agenda but should just stick to economic matters. Well, every one of these cultural battles the fascists win has consequences and those consequences each and every one make it less likely that we can turn things around without violence.

The cultural battle is THE battle. The reason our economics are down the drain is due to the cultural war the fascists have been fighting and winning for forty years. Most of the victories they've gotten have been due to the mistaken idea that we shouldn't fight that sort of battle.

Regards

7 posted on 12/26/2010 11:43:46 AM PST by Rashputin (Barry is totally insane and being kept medicated and on golf courses to hide the fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Without strong senior NCO’s and Officer Corps, the military will become liberalized. I see an overall reduction in esprit d’corps, a general degradation of the quality of commanding officers, and a wimp-a-mization of our troopers in the offing.

I served proudly in the Marine Corps for 7+ years and cringe at the changes I see about to be foisted upon the Corps. I’m hoping that the active duty personnel will resist this by all means possible (subtle and otherwise).


8 posted on 12/26/2010 11:43:46 AM PST by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I think a draft would be good.

I catch cold in drafty places.

9 posted on 12/26/2010 11:44:48 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
A liberal Army, poofer in uniform and armed is still a poofer, bring it on we can solve the problem.
10 posted on 12/26/2010 11:49:08 AM PST by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

Why do you think the draft would be good’ Have you served during the draft? Did you fight a war during the draft? I did and it wasn’t fun. Wvery rapist and criminal going through the court system will be offered a choice of going into the Army or going to jail. That may appeal to you civilians but it is a nightmare for the officvers and NCOs who have to lead these guys into combat and focus a major proportion of the time administering UCMJ against these guys. Screw the draft, I don’t ever want to see it again.


11 posted on 12/26/2010 11:54:45 AM PST by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

“Of course the ultimate goal is the transformation of our Armed Forces into ineffective obedient lap dogs.”

Like Admiral Michael Mullen and General George Casey?


12 posted on 12/26/2010 11:56:02 AM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

Sorry Sarajevo I didn’t mean to post this to you.


13 posted on 12/26/2010 11:57:13 AM PST by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: central_va
May I ask?

Did you serve in the “draftee” military?

I did, and it was not pleasant, to say the least.

Pay at the time was double digit/month and accommodations were more than Spartan - I believe the term used to day would be “ghetto”. The conflict in RVN did not help as resources were pulled from everywhere to feed that conflict.

Worse the bulk of the “draftees” I worked with (in the USAF to avoid draft into the Army) were, for the most part, pretty worthless. They could be counted on to work - enough to stay out of trouble. And if someone was watching.

Trips to an Army installation were a wonder. While at Ft Hood, for example, I noted that all latrines had no doors - to try and slow the use of drugs on the installation. AWOL rates were high and equipment was not maintained.
Too many people who did not want to be there, were forced to serve.

To be sure, there were some very professional folks serving at the time, and a very large number that were not.

Would a draftee military be cheaper?
Yes, yes it would. You do get what you pay for however.

Would it ‘make’ conservatives out of people?
I doubt it very much.

The culture of America has changed so much in the last, say 40 years, that I doubt a conscript military would even work.

As always, YMMV.

14 posted on 12/26/2010 11:57:28 AM PST by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

Mullen is a Bush appointee.


15 posted on 12/26/2010 11:58:23 AM PST by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

“it would virtually assure a return to the draft and the short terms of service that it would bring back with it.”

I think this time it would be the tea partiers marching in the streets against the draft.


16 posted on 12/26/2010 12:01:23 PM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

If the draft is not an option then perhaps with the “repeal”, we no longer have a viable Armed Forces model. Honorable Service with an all volunteer system is going to be strained to the max once the perverts openly fill the upper ranks, NCO and Officers.


17 posted on 12/26/2010 12:03:12 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
delenda est...
18 posted on 12/26/2010 12:04:11 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Agreed. A military composed of sodomites, aliens, women of dubious gender will have no problem supporting “The Divine One” and his apostles.


19 posted on 12/26/2010 12:06:01 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Will you run for President?


20 posted on 12/26/2010 12:06:09 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson