Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

More words of wisdom from our friends at Hillbuzz.org
1 posted on 01/20/2011 5:57:05 AM PST by curth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: curth
Good luck with that.

ineluctable

2 posted on 01/20/2011 6:00:34 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth; Al B.; onyx; Brices Crossroads; Lakeshark; sarah fan UK; Josh Painter
What Professor Jacobson leaves out of his analysis is the clear and determined effort on the part of the media to promote Cocktail Party, losing candidates for the GOP 2012 nomination while vociferously attacking Governor Palin.

This can't be said enough. The MSM and JournoListers want to manipulate public opinion so much that the GOP feels compelled to put up more losers like Romney, Pawlenty, Daniels, Gingrich, etc.

We're all onto their game, but if the GOP is stupid enough to fall for the same old tricks again, then it deserves the candidates it selects and the government it helps elect. Screw them!

3 posted on 01/20/2011 6:04:30 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth
All you freepers here who want Pawlenty or Huckabee or Romney better listen to this article carefully.

Who among those past LOSERS who LOST in the primaries to... wait for it.. McCAIN has the balls to take on Obama?

Palin would not only tell it straight in refreshingly direct language we have heard from ANYONE on our side in a long long time, but I also would not put it past her to walk across the stage and slap his silly ass for lying right to her face.

Or challenge that girly man to a hunting contest- first one to shoot and field dress a whole caribou AND prepared a delicious stew wins.

4 posted on 01/20/2011 6:06:01 AM PST by Mr. K (There are 10 types of people those who know BINARY and those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: curth

Rush is on to them as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUtpVrP85Kk

Not only do they not provide any internals, these polls don’t even give her favorable unfavorable with Republicans. This USA Today Gallup poll is essentially the same as the one in November which had Palin at 40-52, right after the smashing GOP victory.

Nancy Pelosi’s favorable/unfavorable is 33-54. So if this poll is to be believed,Nancy Pelosi, the most unpopular House Speaker in 75 years who presided over a once in a century drubbing of the party in the midterms two months ago is roughly as popular as the very same politician—Sarah Palin— who was most responsible for administering the drubbing and has a favorable rating of 76% in her own party (according to Rasmussen).

http://www.gallup.com/poll/145664/Boehner-Favorability-Jumps-Obama-Back-Above.aspx

In other words, they are saying, pay absolutely no attention to the empirical evidence—63 House seats taken—and trust that they weighted the poll correctly with the right demographic and geographic mix and party percentages. Sorry, but I do not trust USA Today or Gallup or CNN, especially when they try to tell me to pay no attention to what eyes see...that black really is white...and white is black (depending, of course, on how they weight it).

If their purpose is to deter Sarah Palin (and I think it is), it is not going to work. She is a good deal smarter than I, and it is easy for me to see through this ruse.


6 posted on 01/20/2011 6:17:39 AM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson