[Dan(9698)]

second go at an injunction.

The finding that the law was void, makes it so an injunction is unnecessary. The law is void.

[SAJ]

The injunction will **become** necessary if the party-to-be-enjoined can be shown to be not complying with the declarative judgment (i.e. that the law in question is void, but defendant is engaged in implementing it regardless).

If you or I were the defendant in a similar (obviously not identical) case, we would be summarily found guilty of contempt, and likely jailed for the egregious nature of the contempt. Unfortunately, this is not an option for the judge here, and a subsequent injunction will need to be issued.