Skip to comments.Tammy Bruce - Sarah Palin Didn't Say She Supports Go Proud, She Said All Voices Are Welcome
Posted on 02/10/2011 7:08:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Tammy lays it all down about what Sarah Palin said and that this isn't all about the Gays but freedom, because with out freedom it doesn't matter if you're straight or gay, I can't put into words all that Tammy said but I do understand freedom and with out it nothing matters.
(VIDEO AT LINK)
Sorry cino-progressives—the gay issue as a wedge to stop Palin just didn’t work.
You guys will just have to come up with more falsehoods, and the results might help you get used to losing.
Take that all you Sarah haters.
Direct link to video:
Yeah, he was too busy building consulates for Mexico, pardoning “ethnic” murderers and cooking squirrel on a popcorn popper to worry about the down low.
Thanks. This is what I’ve been trying to say on this issue, but Tammy Bruce nails it.
Odd that the same people who attack Sarah for turning down a CPAC appearance because they insist that she didn’t say it quite right, are shilling for Michelle Bachman, who DID agree to give a keynote speech at CPAC.
I like Michelle Bachman, but I think we need her right where she is—pushing congress to stop playing games and start really cutting spending. Maybe if she succeeds at that, she can move on up the political ladder. But it’s too soon now.
Well, I hear NAMBLA believes in drastic cuts in law enforcement and corrections budgets...
Are NAMBLA’s voices welcome?? Is The Incest Alliance (I hope that doesn’t exist) welcome? A kiddie pornographers welcome? Are major drug kingpins welcome? A socialists welcome? Are marxists welcome? Are Stalinist welcome?
What does “All voices” mean??
It’s kind of sad that we have to keep getting smoke signals to figure this stuff out. Life shouldn’t be like a CSI episode, we aren’t investigating some great mystery.
Sarah Palin can tell us exactly what she thinks about everything. Until she does, it is clear she has no interest in us knowing these things, and it’s silly to try to “read the tea leaves”.
Great point....The all voices crowd gets an “A” for being tolerate of the deviant.
Why does a private citizen in Alaska who’s not running for any office owe you an explanation on anything? Or did she declare while I was eating dinner?
Sarah Palin 2012...
Palin is hedging her bets. and she’s going to have to take a stand sooner or later. GOProud isn’t just a gay group... their stated mission is to purge social conservatives... including religious members... from the GOP.
I missed it. What did Bachmann say about GOPround when she gave the keynote?
Nice to see Tammy chime in. She has great clarity on a lot of issues, and also really knows how the political left thinks and acts, since she was one of their foot soldiers for so long.
I also admit I root for her because she has had a bit of a rough life. I like to see her do well and hopefully find happiness.
huck said it was their business not sure what Bachman said.
what would you have him do regarding homosexuals? What’s the winning move here?
Based on the comments here, I see little evidence that anyone actually listened to Tammy’s audio.
Tammy didn’t even address the central issue re: GOProud, instead using the same tired leftist tactics, talking of “healthy debate” and having “more important issues.”
Start with DADT
Egalitarianism - the Marxist mantra
GOProud are behaving exactly like liberal gays by forcing their minority position on the majority through guilt. Doesn't work well with conservatives. We're immune. Perhaps CPAC should change their name to GOPAC.
Michele Bachmann was very strong in support of all 3 legs of the stool. Unequivocal, in fact. This is not about gays, it's about the old guard vs. the Tea Party. No doubt in my mind who's going to come out on top.
I see. Mrs Palin can have her own PAC, use her influence to convince voters to support the candidates of her choice, opine on various news shows, compose op-eds for newspapers and write articles for magazines...but ask her a question? How DARE anyone be so bold as to do that!
By the way, genius, where is it fecking written that a person has to formally declare before they are compelled to answer questions about their position on any certain policy?
You or I could start a PAC tomorrow, FRiend. As the caveman said “Might want to do a little research.”
“Sarah Palin didn’y say she SUPPORTS go-proud, she said all voices are welcome.”
What’s the difference?
Oh, I see, that clears every thing up............
Mom, take your prom-hair back home ...?
I think where they get it wrong is by forming an independent organization based on the kind of sex they have. That seems weird to me.
I agree completely. I love Tammy...um...you know what I mean.
That was Bristol.
>>>What does All voices mean??<<<
All are free to voice an opinion. But there’s no guarantee it will be heard, or taken seriously based on merit.
I sure do hope that if she does become a candidate you feckers remain situated behind a keyboard and don't attempt to convince people face-to-face to support Palin. You, et al, have submitted enough that one can be assured that your real confidence in Palin is superficial. If it were genuine, (like the caveman's), you'd never protest to the idea of her stating exactly where she stands. Whether, or not, she is a "private citizen".
You like comparing her to Reagan, well when he was a "private citizen" he made it clear where he stood on every fecking issue. People already knew Reagan's position on any issue before he became a candidate for POTUS.
I'd suggest, (though know it's futile), that you treat Mrs Palin as a person rather than a demi-God(ess).
Good point. My point is where do you draw the big tent line?
NAMBLA? Bestiality? Pornographers for conservative values?
Go Proud wants social conservatives out of the party. Nice people?
I’m not the one who keeps posting 2nd-hand sources trying to explain stuff that could be easily answered if Sarah wanted us to know. If Palin wants you to understand exactly what her position is on an issue, she will tell you. We know she has no problem speaking her mind — she wrote two books, and did a highly acclaimed reality show, and has a regular appearance on Fox, as well as a twitter and facebook account, and reporters scrambling to report anything she says.
But some people don’t want to wait for her to announce her positions, I guess, because they find it more interesting to read the tea leaves, or play detective or something.
I don’t know. Did someone post a thread asking some 3rd-party pundit to explain Bachmann’s position?
If Bachmann wants to let us know her position on an issue, she is certainly capable of telling us. Fortunately for Bachmann, her supporters don’t seem quite as interested in trying to create positions for her by quoting 2nd-hand sources and reading into everything she says.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.