Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Governor Has the Power to Replace the Vacant Democratic Legislators
Bobbi85710's Mouth in the South Baby Boomer Banter ^ | 2/18/11 | Bobbi

Posted on 02/18/2011 2:47:36 PM PST by Nachum

Wisconsin Constitution

Page 48

The Democratic Legislators have vacated their posts and moved to another state, there is no question that the governor is well within his rights to call an election. God speed Wisconsin!

(Excerpt) Read more at bobbi85710.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: governor; power; replace; wisconsin; wisconsinshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last
Link- to the section of the WI constitution page letting the Gov. do this.

I, would love to see him try to fire these Demohacks to watch Obama's head spin.

1 posted on 02/18/2011 2:47:39 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Corn in the popper!


2 posted on 02/18/2011 2:49:50 PM PST by JaguarXKE (Life - It's 10 percent circumstances and 90 percent how you react to circumstances - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

emails are in order . let the governor know the people are behind him and to replace those derelicts.


3 posted on 02/18/2011 2:50:47 PM PST by Catsrus (Have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Don’t think it works unless they actually resign or break a law and get thrown out. I’d like to think he can just do it, but it seems sort of vague.


4 posted on 02/18/2011 2:50:47 PM PST by edpc (It's Kräusened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I like this governor.

And with the union head willing to make concessions, you know where the public is standing on this story.


5 posted on 02/18/2011 2:51:00 PM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Oh, that *WOULD* be awesome to see.
Write a letter, certified mail, to him with the idea and the relevant Constitutional section.

:)


6 posted on 02/18/2011 2:51:00 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Wisconsin Democrat Absentee Madness [LIVE THREAD]
7 posted on 02/18/2011 2:51:00 PM PST by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

That was fast!

Wisconsin Democrats could stay away for weeks
Friday, February 18, 2011 1:52:47 PM · 67 of 92
Uncle Miltie to Jean S
There must be a constitutional process for a Legislator unwilling to complete their term.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies


8 posted on 02/18/2011 2:52:08 PM PST by Uncle Miltie ("And did you exchange a walk on part in a war, for a lead role in a cage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Sounds like this guy has a possible future running with Sarah Palin for POTUS and VP.


9 posted on 02/18/2011 2:52:45 PM PST by Eye of Unk ("These people are either at your neck or at your knees" A quote by Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I guess the question becomes, at what point is a seat considered vacant.


10 posted on 02/18/2011 2:52:49 PM PST by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

Dang. Got to buy the “industrial size” drum of popcorn.


11 posted on 02/18/2011 2:52:58 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Please let this happen! It seems like the perfect time and the perfect opportunity to shove Obozo out the door.


12 posted on 02/18/2011 2:54:11 PM PST by DrDude (Focused like a LASER on creating jobs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Good Idea Ping.


13 posted on 02/18/2011 2:54:24 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He should just declare them mentally incompetent and replace them.


14 posted on 02/18/2011 2:55:49 PM PST by jerseyrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

15 posted on 02/18/2011 2:57:30 PM PST by Califreak (Soros is the root of all evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The governor has the authority to call an election for a vacancy but I don’t see that he has the authority to declare a seat vacant.


16 posted on 02/18/2011 2:58:29 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Did they steal a publicly owned vehicle and
drive it out of state? Are they using public funds
without authorization for the travel? Taking the
vehicle could be grand theft or better assessed
against all of them. Put out a warrant for their
arrest and ask I’LL to extradite them.


17 posted on 02/18/2011 2:59:03 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’ll send him a $100 campaign donation if he’ll just try and fire these wussies...


18 posted on 02/18/2011 2:59:27 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

1. Governor announces calmly that he will declare vacant the seat of any legislator whose absence from the floor plainly is voluntary / obstinate (as is provable these days by their public statements, Tweets, etc.) if the absence lasts 72 hours or more.

2. Wait the 72 hours.

3. If any Dems fail to appear on the floor in time, declare the seat vacant and schedule a special election for each. (This immediately whittles away the # of legislators required for a quorum, because it lowers the number “elected” (validly holding office).)


19 posted on 02/18/2011 2:59:49 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Ask IL to extradite them. Damned automatic
spelling “fixer” screwed up my post.


20 posted on 02/18/2011 3:02:02 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Photobucket
21 posted on 02/18/2011 3:04:03 PM PST by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

22 posted on 02/18/2011 3:04:08 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Awesome! FYI, if any of you live in the western part of Wisconsin, the Minnesota marxists are planning a rally in Hudson, WI, tomorrow around 9:30. Anybody is welcome to FReep them.
23 posted on 02/18/2011 3:04:26 PM PST by rabidralph ((Mu)Barak must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Um, I doubt that Scott will go there.

The Dems really booted it. To run away on the first little thing that didn’t appeal to them is causing them to be a laughingstock. There is much worse to come - what are they going to do - seek asylum in Canada?

They will come back sheepishly. They will learn, eventually, to take it. Just like the Repubs had to “take it” for years.


24 posted on 02/18/2011 3:04:31 PM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
The governor has the authority to call an election for a vacancy but I don’t see that he has the authority to declare a seat vacant.

I think he should try it anyway. If he must, go to court and the election commission to show reasonable cause. See if the legislators show up to avoid court. See if they take any illegal donations to defend their seats.

The Rats would do it in a heart beat. Time to play it their way.

25 posted on 02/18/2011 3:06:42 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The “run to avoid a quorum” trick works if you can leave one person behind to force a roll call to check if a quorum is there. But what happens if the Republicans just don’t call a roll and assume that there are 20 Senators there and start voting on those things requiring a 3/5 quorum? Can they just deem there to be a quorum unless someone demands an actual roll call... but if there were a Dem there to do it they would have the 20 they need? What legal options do the Dems have if the Republicans just start voting things in 19-0 and “assume” that the Dem (there had to have been one somewhere) just abstained?


26 posted on 02/18/2011 3:12:13 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Do it!

Do It!!

DO IT!!!!!


27 posted on 02/18/2011 3:12:22 PM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

About the only way they could pull off “intolerable pressure” on one of those legislators would be a very backdoor means, using one of the more disreputable tricks involved with the drug war, asset forfeiture.

Simple put, since legislators cannot be arrested on State charges, or obliged to attend State court in civil actions, they have limited immunity.

However, because of drug war rules, property can be “arrested”, even if its owner is not charged with a crime. Any home, property, or vehicle of these legislators could be seized if so much as a minuscule amount of drugs were found in or on them—or are alleged to be by an anonymous informant.

Of course, if the legislator returns home promptly, it can all be cleared up quickly. But until then, their expensive sports car, for example, will be held in a police impound lot. Or if they live alone, their home can be secured by the police as a potential crime scene.

Once local or State police had done this, of course, they would have to contact the federal authorities, but that could take days or weeks.


28 posted on 02/18/2011 3:14:19 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

That’s been my question. The dems are traveling on SOMEONE’S dime. If it’s on the taxpayers they are going to get slaughtered next election. My guess is the unions are paying, but that doesn’t look so good for the dems either.


29 posted on 02/18/2011 3:20:35 PM PST by boop ("Let's just say they'll be satisfied with LESS"... Ming the Merciless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

[governor is well within his rights to call an election]

...at the same time run a full page ad in the paper needing teachers IMMEDIATELY.


30 posted on 02/18/2011 3:22:01 PM PST by RetSignman ("It's about saving our Republic, STUPID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I am sure to hear the weepy cry of baby democraps all the way down in South Texas if he does this. I want to see it happen, and to see the losers kicked out if they don’t want to be there.


31 posted on 02/18/2011 3:24:09 PM PST by King_Corey (www.kingcorey.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

I guess the question becomes, at what point is a seat considered vacant.

Or ... can such a provision be codified into state law with a simple majority of the legislators present to vote.


32 posted on 02/18/2011 3:24:36 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE
Corn in the popper!

Rum in the glass!

33 posted on 02/18/2011 3:29:09 PM PST by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Dang. Got to buy the “industrial size” drum of popcorn.

Darn. Trying to find the magnum size bottle of rum. Is it almost party time?

34 posted on 02/18/2011 3:30:59 PM PST by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Each Rep and Senator has a place to sit in their respective chamber, that place is called a seat. The seat is vacated when you refuse to sit in it during session. One can argue a bunch of BS, but that’s what it means to vacate one’s seat. Let the courts decide what a vacated seat means. The American people know. My employees know what a happens when they vacate their seat.
I like mine with butter, please.


35 posted on 02/18/2011 3:35:13 PM PST by Floribama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Put out a warrant for their arrest and ask I’LL to extradite them.

Except for treason, they're immune from arrest. Read the rest of the section posted of the WI constitution.
36 posted on 02/18/2011 3:43:13 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Here’s another solution: have one Republican officially change parties.


37 posted on 02/18/2011 3:59:18 PM PST by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“The “run to avoid a quorum” trick works if you can leave one person behind to force a roll call to check if a quorum is there. But what happens if the Republicans just don’t call a roll and assume that there are 20 Senators there...”

I LOVE IT. I can see it happening (in a loud, deep voice): “...and not hearing any objection, I DECLARE a quorum to be present.”

LOL


38 posted on 02/18/2011 4:05:24 PM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

Brilliant, Genius, Simple..... I love it.


39 posted on 02/18/2011 4:07:06 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Link- to the section of the WI constitution page letting the Gov. do this.

The seats aren't vacant.

40 posted on 02/18/2011 4:08:55 PM PST by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
These Democrat legislators are communists. I've been saying that Democrats are communists. It is their belief in a strong central Government and controlled by Marxist that is the main basis. Putting King Obama as dictator is one of their main objects since King Obama is a dunce and can be used for their purpose.
41 posted on 02/18/2011 4:11:19 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The members are absent but the seat is vacant.

I would rather explore the right of the governor to withhold pay from them while they are absent.


42 posted on 02/18/2011 4:23:33 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Which are you? A producer, a looter, or a moocher of wealth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

They need 20 Senators, the fact that all absent are democrats
they phrase it in a way that could be confusing.


43 posted on 02/18/2011 4:32:08 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

They need 20 warm bodies. Quorum doesn’t care about party affiliation.


44 posted on 02/18/2011 4:38:11 PM PST by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Oh how I hope one of his advisors reads here. Wouldn’t it be lovely if he announced tomorrow that if they were not back in session by X date that a special eletion would be called to replace every one of them.... LOL


45 posted on 02/18/2011 5:29:10 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Doesn't Wisconsin have recall? I thought that was the law since laFollette’s day. it seems tome some freepers could take the law of the state in their own hands and recall a legislator or two.
46 posted on 02/18/2011 5:41:52 PM PST by bilhosty (Don' t tax people tax newsprint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
The “run to avoid a quorum” trick works if you can leave one person behind to force a roll call to check if a quorum is there.

I wondered the same thing. When my State Senator (Texas) legged it to New Mexico a few years ago, they left one Dem behind to raise a point of order that there was not a quorum. In Texas, the Dems could leave one behind, and still deny a quorum. The Wisconsin Dems cannot. I suspect that they (1) hope the Republicans, in what used to be a "good government" State, are too fastidious to ram it through, (2) hope that the Wisconsin Courts will ignore the "enrolled bill rule" (which says a Court cannot judicially review whether a bill certified as passed by the Legislature, really was lawfully passed), and (3) hope that the Unions will appreciate the fact they stayed bought.

47 posted on 02/18/2011 5:47:01 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Ooops. Thanks.


48 posted on 02/18/2011 6:47:24 PM PST by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All

Vacant is the wrong word; “abandoned” makes it work. Failure to answer quorum calls may be the key.


49 posted on 02/18/2011 8:48:16 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012: don't retreat, just restock [chg'd to comply w/ The Civility in Discourse Act of 2011])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I saw this at MISH today:

"Inquiring minds are reading snips from a Letter from FDR Regarding Collective Bargaining of Public Unions written August 16, 1937.

All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management.

The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations.

Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of Government employees.

A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable. "

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/02/public-union-protesters-more-like-greek.html

FDR against strikes by public unions!!!!!! Take that libbies!!!

50 posted on 02/18/2011 8:55:09 PM PST by TruthConquers ( Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson