What a tool. I'd like to have him explain how this statistic is relevant to...anything.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
David Brooks likes to do the same thing with gerbils that Richard Gere does.
2 posted on
02/27/2011 11:27:48 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
More people own Unicorns than read David Brooks.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Huh? Many more people watch FOX News every day than read the NY Times every day.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
So? More people own Picassos than watch MSNBC.
5 posted on
02/27/2011 11:28:56 AM PST by
Patrick1
("The problem with Internet quotations is that many are not genuine." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Brooks choose a telling metaphor.
6 posted on
02/27/2011 11:29:02 AM PST by
AU72
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Stick to gerbils, Dave. At least you know them firsthand.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
More people saw their toes off and eat them as Hors d’œuvres than know who David Brooks is or who care about his opinion.
8 posted on
02/27/2011 11:29:38 AM PST by
rlmorel
(How to relate to Liberals? Take a Conservative, remove all responsibility...logic...)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
IF that’s true, then there are more ferret owners than CNN,MSNBC, and all the other news channels combined. Makes for a lot of ferret poop.
9 posted on
02/27/2011 11:29:58 AM PST by
Keith in Iowa
(FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
David Brooks is no conservative.
He’s an intellectually dishonest, leftist enabling twit.
10 posted on
02/27/2011 11:30:24 AM PST by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
David Brooks - the progressive’s poster boy of a good “conservative”.
12 posted on
02/27/2011 11:31:30 AM PST by
aquila48
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
what about the overlapping set? eh?
people who BOTH own a ferret and watch fox news.
got you there sucker.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
David Brooks: ‘More people own ferrets than watch Fox News’More people named their ferrets David Brooks than read his article.
14 posted on
02/27/2011 11:32:10 AM PST by
dragonblustar
("... and if you disagree with me, then you sir, are worse than Hitler!" - Greg Gutfeld)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Hey David... many more ferret owners use the NYT for cage lining than read the rag... and I’d bet you I’m closer to the truth than you...
16 posted on
02/27/2011 11:33:10 AM PST by
dps.inspect
(the system is rigged...)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Wow, cool, I had no idea there were hundreds of millions of ferrets out there.
18 posted on
02/27/2011 11:33:35 AM PST by
CincyRichieRich
(Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Looks like he ferreted out that factoid from this article
http://www.vailvalleyinstitute.org/amdiv/Fiorina.html
*******************
There were roughly ½ million people on this e-mail list. Now in absolute numbers, that’s a big number — 560,000 people. That happens to be the same number of Americans who own ferrets. And since ferrets are illegal in California and in New York City that number is clearly an underestimate. So, in other words, if you go out and pick out a random American voter, the odds are higher that that person owns a ferret than that that person was on Howard Dean’s e-mail list.
************************
19 posted on
02/27/2011 11:33:51 AM PST by
libertarian27
(Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Ferrets have higher IQs than David Brooks.
20 posted on
02/27/2011 11:34:02 AM PST by
LibFreeOrDie
(Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts; All
Which means 10 times as many people own ferrets than read David Brooks.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Not bloody likely.
Mr. niteowl77
23 posted on
02/27/2011 11:38:47 AM PST by
niteowl77
(I don't mind them stewing in their own juices, but I do mind them stewing me in their own juices.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I don't know who David Rooks but If more people have Ferrets than then follows that there are more Ferrets than liberals, More ferrets than watchers of CNNNBCCNSABC....
24 posted on
02/27/2011 11:40:12 AM PST by
mountainlion
(The government is not my god no matter how much they preach.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
i want to amend my earlier post. been thinking, ferrets don't strike me as particularly “liberal”.
so its probable most people who own a ferret watch fox news. therefore i think it unlikely that more people own ferrets than watch fox news since that implies that most of the non fox watching public is disproportionately ferret owning.
plus ferret owning is regional, and in those high ferret ownership (also right to work right to ferret states) fox watching is higher than the non ferret NY media market.
statistically speaking of course.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
