Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Looks like Glenn Beck was right - the islamists and the progressives must be working together. We need to stand strong against this.
1 posted on 02/28/2011 10:12:41 AM PST by FredJake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FredJake

Hummm, they wanna play cowboys and muzzies?


2 posted on 02/28/2011 10:16:27 AM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Barf me with a spoon!!


3 posted on 02/28/2011 10:21:34 AM PST by diamond6 (Check out: http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/home.php and learn about the faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Many Kool Aid Drinking American Liberals are lining to support the implementation of Sharia.(sarc)


4 posted on 02/28/2011 10:27:56 AM PST by gitmogrunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Bring it, Muzzies. I’ll show you what red-blooded Americans do when you go Sharia on our women.


8 posted on 02/28/2011 10:38:10 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
One of the major concerns of people critical of Shariah law is that it is subject to interpretation and evolution. There is virtually no formal certification process to designate someone as being qualified to interpret Islamic law. As it stands today, almost anyone can make rulings as long as they have the appearance of piety and a group of followers.

Anyone want to join my new Cult and make up the rules as we go.

11 posted on 02/28/2011 11:00:57 AM PST by razorback-bert (Some days it's not worth chewing through the straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
One of the major concerns of people critical of Shariah law is that it is subject to interpretation and evolution. There is virtually no formal certification process to designate someone as being qualified to interpret Islamic law. As it stands today, almost anyone can make rulings as long as they have the appearance of piety and a group of followers.

Anyone want to join my new Cult and make up the rules as we go.

12 posted on 02/28/2011 11:01:14 AM PST by razorback-bert (Some days it's not worth chewing through the straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake

Will there be anyone to stand against this?


14 posted on 02/28/2011 11:34:17 AM PST by Excellence (Buy Progresso, take off the label, write "not halal," mail to Campbell's soup company.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FredJake
“We hereby call upon the Muslims in the US, particularly in New York, Michigan, Chicago and Washington DC to take lessons from their Muslim brothers and sisters in North Africa and the Middle East and rise to implement the Shari’ah in America.”

We could certainly use the lesson of Sharia Law vis-a-vis death sentence for insulting Islam. To wit, we need a law making it a capital offense to insult our American heritage.. for example by advocating replacing it with Islamism (political Islam, Sharia Law).

15 posted on 02/28/2011 11:36:53 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson