One federal judge who ruled on an Obama eligibility lawsuit put it very succinctly: “Plaintiffs attempt to subvert this grant of power to Congress by convincing the Court that it should disregard the constitutional procedures in place for the removal of a sitting President. The process for removal of a sitting president-REMOVAL FOR ANY REASON— is within the province of Congress, not the Courts.”—US District Court Judge David O Carter, Barnett, et. al. v Obama, 10/29/09
Since that decision, no Court, in scores of attempts, including 13 attempts at the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled any differently from Judge Carter.
On the statement by Judge Donald Carter: In all the hearings previous, he was really zipping along toward an airing of eligibility issues, granting standing to the petitioners. Then he suddenly reversed, and OBTW, had acquired a new law clerk from the defendant’s then counsel, Perkins Coie (Seattle.) And, if memory serves, this particular clerk had an unusual credential an African background perhaps Kenyan, not African-American, African.
Corrections with apologies:
1. Judge is David not Donald Carter.
2. New clerk for the case, Sidhartha Valendra (sp.?) is not from Kenya.