Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

“I think he is correct on this, containment appears to be a identified weakness in this circa 1971 design.”

—I’m just correcting the claim that the Fukushima reactors are BWR-1 types. They’re actually all BWR-3 and higher:

http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/CNPP2010_CD/pages/AnnexII/tables/table2.htm

As for containment flaws with this design- could well be, I don’t know. I’ll defer to the experts here.


50 posted on 03/13/2011 12:56:22 PM PDT by Qbert ("I seem to smell the stench of appeasement in the air" - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Qbert
Right. I think the design is pretty similar in many ways across the line, though, and in some articles the design is criticized for its containment design, done to save money.

Here is a generic cutaway of this design:

That said, though, the author describes the first containment as the zircaloy tubes. Check, they have those which we cannot see in this diagram because they are contained inside the bronze colored vessel.

The second containment is the "pressure cooker (bronze colored vessel) in which all the tubes are contained...check, they have that.

The third is the containment vessel, and it appears to have that as well with the big toroidal looking structure at the bottom.

So my impression is this author is describing this type okay...

51 posted on 03/13/2011 1:29:02 PM PDT by rlmorel (How to relate to Liberals? Take a Conservative, remove all responsibility...logic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson