Skip to comments.Is green the new red (communism)?
Posted on 03/22/2011 2:14:04 PM PDT by EllisWashingtonReport
Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudo-scientific fraud I have seen in my long life. ~ Dr. Harold Lewis
Ten days ago, Harold Lewis, Ph.D., emeritus professor of physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, tendered his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr., Princeton University, president of the American Physical Society, because Dr. Lewis finally realized that he could no longer support what he called the "successful pseudo-scientific fraud" of global warming.
Remember, to the Democratic Party and RINO Republicans, truth doesn't matter, because to them truth is relative. All that matters to liberals and progressives is Nietzsche's "Will to Power" and control over the people. Like the Islamic doctrine Taqiyya, which sanctions deceit to further Islam, to progressives the end justifies the means; therefore, lying, stealing, killing and perverting the Constitution and science is acceptable to utopian socialists as long as they "change the world."
Recall the words of New Deal brain-truster Stuart Chase who, after visiting the Soviet Union in the 1920s, asked with incredulity, "Why should Russians have all the fun remaking the world?" Progressives are very resilient, so when Soviet communism finally collapsed after 70 years of world wide tyranny, progressives and liberal Democrats pushed the existential green movement to the forefront, which was in reality the same old exhausted red communism in a new disguise.
Green is now the new red (communism).
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
It HAS been, FOR YEARS!!!
watermelon. green on the outside red on the inside
Yes it is, and it’s been my tagline for quite awhile now.
A lot of text to come up with an obvious answer.........
On a side note, if Castle in DE repudiated his House vote for C&T and had promised he would oppose any effort to bring it up in the Senate, he would have easily won the seat and would have been seated in the lame duck.
Alas, he was a true believer in the hoax ... as I am afraid that a President McCain would have been.
Right, it’s just the same old red.
The fundamental emotion of this movement is a pathologic fear of industrial civilization and of science and technology, and the hatred of man and his achievements. The basic premise is the anti-man idea that nature possesses intrinsic value in and of itself apart from all contribution to human life and well being.
I remember in about 1990 when Gorbachev was noted as part of the GREEN party.....anyone else remember...and suspect?
Wow! I was surprised by the fast response to my latest posting. Your comments were particularly instructive. I will follow up on your points in my next article this Sat. @ www.wnd.com.
The author is a little late by about 20+ years.
Of course it is. It is overrun with commies and socialists.
For gosh’s sake 20 years ago Gorbachev set up THE GREEN CROSS in the Presidio building in San Fran.
Stupid media moron thinks he’s the first guy to ever ask the question, like nobody knows it, he’s found something new.
Didn’t you just ride the Viking Kitty the other day?
Nation-building? No, Christian-building (Liberation Zotology!)
www.EllisWashingtonReport.com ^ | 01/22/11 | Ellis Washington
Posted on Sunday, March 20, 2011 10:41:31 AM by EllisWashingtonReport
Cloward-Piven and Saul Alinsky linked to Obama and his minions are headquarters.. but not the only headquarters..
Soros and the Soros archipelago.. of groups are the battle lines..
There is the uncivil Civil War.. moving right along..
Everyone is a part of it.. by direction or indirection.. On purpose or just enabling it.. every soul is part of it..
The way to WIN IT is by de-funding the federal government.. take away "the MONEY" and it is un-fueled.. ham-stringed.. de-balled.. The Civil War then becomes chicken scratchings.. just clucking.. It is a WAR of entitlements..
The Entitlement WAR.. no money.... no entitlement.. no re-apportionment.. no re-distribution.. no affirmative action..
I know that it is popular for many conservatives to talk about the greens being the new reds, but this is simply untrue. Communism was based on humanism, not environmentalism. Nazism is the far better comparison precisely because they actually incorporated a serious green agenda into the Third Reich in the early to mid 1930’s. Nazism is based on Nature. Even their racism was rooted in Nature and ecology (see especially www.rmarkmusser.com for a synopsis of what this is all about). On the other hand, Communism is based on humanism and economics. In other words, when reds become green, they are actually moving toward fascism away from Marxism, something which many Germans did in the early 20th century.
That sounds reasonable. I didn’t make up “watermelon”.
Duh. The greens have been called “watermelons” for quite some time now. Is World Nut Daily just catching on to what was meant?
Yes I understand. I have been hearing about watermelons for several years now. I think the first time I read it was from Chris Horner, or perhaps Steve Milloy.