I know that it is popular for many conservatives to talk about the greens being the new reds, but this is simply untrue. Communism was based on humanism, not environmentalism. Nazism is the far better comparison precisely because they actually incorporated a serious green agenda into the Third Reich in the early to mid 1930’s. Nazism is based on Nature. Even their racism was rooted in Nature and ecology (see especially www.rmarkmusser.com for a synopsis of what this is all about). On the other hand, Communism is based on humanism and economics. In other words, when reds become green, they are actually moving toward fascism away from Marxism, something which many Germans did in the early 20th century.
That sounds reasonable. I didn’t make up “watermelon”.
Your ideas are conventional, but sadly incomplete. I will address the idea proposed in Jonah Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism” (2007) that Hitler and Stalin were both leftists and that Nazism and communism are more similar than different and more importantly have strong links to American Progressivism. Remember the German commnunist slogan of the 1920s: ‘First brown, then red’. (See on this cite, “The Molech paradigm, Part 2.”
Look for my newest article “The Nazi cult of the organic” to be posted on WorldNetDaily.com on Sat. 3/26. It will expound upon many of your ideas.