Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2011 3:52:28 PM PDT by Walter Scott Hudson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Walter Scott Hudson

This is simple. The NWO. That is what is up. They are forming the Arab Union to go along with the EU. We will be next if they succeed as the North American Union with Canada and Mexico. Amero Dollars look less Kooky every day.


2 posted on 03/28/2011 3:58:07 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (Obama Sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

This was one of the comments to a related article — and NAILS the issue:

No treaty is even “co-equal” to the Constitution. Jefferson wrote in the Senate’s Legislative Parliamentary Manual that treaties are “legislative acts” of no different character than any other legislation, and that they may therefore be overridden by the Congress at any time just as any other Act may.

Furthermore, the US Supreme Court specifically ruled in Reid v. Covert, “This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.” - Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.

Key points the the ruling:

1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution.

2) Treaties cannot amend the Constitution in effect.

3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress.

Further from the ruling: “No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution.” [my emphasis, to show that the executive is included in the scope of the ruling]

Reid continued to say that if there is a conflict between a Congressional enactment and the terms of a ratified treaty, then “the statute to the extent of conflict, renders the treaty null.”

This is not the only SCOTUS ruling relevant, In Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, the Court held that regarding the treaty power expressed in the Constitution, “It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or a change in the character of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter without its consent.”

As Jefferson pointed out in a letter to Wilson C. Nicholas in 1803, regarding “those who consider the grant of the treaty making power as boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.”


3 posted on 03/28/2011 3:58:07 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Walter Scott Hudson
SEEN TPM
4 posted on 03/28/2011 4:05:00 PM PDT by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

Well the Consitution is sure important to all the “right” people...I mean the ones who REALLY count. /s

American Muslim Union

“Younes, who founded the Paterson-based grass-roots organization in the hopes of serving the American Muslim community and promoting equality, told the roughly 500 attendees that religious freedom is a constitutional right.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2696044/posts

I just KNOW that hillary and suha would agree.


5 posted on 03/28/2011 4:06:37 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Note: I do NOT capitalize anything I don't respect...like obama and/or islam...but I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

Liberals have no use for the Constitution, unless it can be used to thwart Republicans.


6 posted on 03/28/2011 4:11:54 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

7 posted on 03/28/2011 4:14:12 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Walter Scott Hudson

Good to see MSM is doing their research. /extreme sarc.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2693331/posts

FLASHBACK: Senator Clinton Says Bush Must Ask Congress Before Using (any use of) Force Against Iran
AP ^ | February 14, 2007

Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:10:21 AM by maggief

WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton warned President Bush on Wednesday not to take any military action against Iran without getting congressional approval first.

“If the administration believes that any, any use of force against Iran is necessary, the president must come to Congress to seek that authority,” Clinton said in a Senate speech.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


14 posted on 03/29/2011 3:53:55 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson