Posted on 03/31/2011 5:29:25 AM PDT by scottfactor
It is long past being tiresome. I’m talking about people like you who run around like the iconic Chicken Little yelling the “sky is falling, the sky is falling”.
We are less than 4 months beyond the last mid-terms when US House Tea Party conservatives were elected in sufficient numbers to put a serious dent in the Usurping Marxist Onada’s Marxist Agenda. It may very well be that it is not happening IAW your priorities or as fast as you would like it. But it is happening.
In addition, Tea Party conservative governors are also stepping up to the plate. Wisconsin’s Walker has put the lie to the tenet that attacking the civil service and teacher unions art third rails that must not be touched. Breaking this taboo will spread to other states as well as the finally confront the fact that Obamanomics is worsening America’s 15-20% unemployment record. Translation: Both the business and citizen tax payer base is shrinking. It will continue to shrink.
Upshot: It would require devastatingly catastrophic tax increases of the shrinking tax base, right now as we speak—not some time in the distant future, to be able to afford the public union plutocratic life style. This is called reality.
Keep in mind that it took Marxists—via lies, deceit, subversion and cooption—over 60 years to insert a Marxist in the WH. I think Tea Party conservatives are off to a credible start.
Like you, I wish it would go faster. But the reality, again, is that the Onada regime continues to control the Senate and WH. It also controls much of the federal and state judiciary, Wall Street, too many private sector company Board’s of Directors (GE and GM, for example)the MSM, non-public unions, religious leadership and education.
You naysayers will become relevant to me when you evolve from whining to constructive approaches for dealing with the total Marxist threat.
So, the Bible is “fruit loops”?
Tell your story walking, pal.
So, the Bible is “fruit loops”?
Tell your story walking, pal.
****************************
You’re FRuit Loops, pal. Go back and live in the 12th century like your mooslim buddies.
I guess Free Republic is not free of idiots.
I believe the Bible refers to women being restricted in authority only in spiritual matters, not in secular matters. The office of President of the United States is a secular position not a spiritual one.
I understand, and I know that there are always exceptions.
But, now I have a jerk calling me a “fruit loop” for preferring male leadership. I happen to prefer strong, male leaders—there’s nothing fruit loopy about that.
He also understands the free market and how business works. This is a guy who would drive our economic engine by simply standing aside.
I also like his attitude toward the Chicoms and the Arabs.
Leadership has many different meanings. When we elect a public servant their "leadership" and "strength" are not as important to me as their adherence to their stated principles and their adherence to the constitution. Now if you consider that to be leadership and strength great, if not please consider what you intend to elect as a public servant. Stalin for example was male, strong, and a good leader. I wouldn't want the likes for America.
Of course, when I say “strong, male leadership,” I don’t mean evil leadership. That I hope for virtue in that leader is a given.
He has also declared bankruptcy twice, and holds liberal positions on virtually every important issue we face. Perhaps you should just vote for a democrat that actually admits to being a democrat. That way you know they are honest in one regard.
Ping
“I guess Free Republic is not free of idiots”.
****************************
Fruit loops, I TOTALLY agree with your statement considering YOUR posts and YOUR opinion that woman are not CAPABLE of being leaders. That’s a truly idiotic stance, but people like you can’t see how idiotic they are and hiding behind the bible is really cowardly, so be it.
Someone posted Trumps political donations 100% democrat. Another Bloomberg republican, a democrat that can’t get elected as a democrat so they change their party but govern. as a democrat...all ego, no brain...
I don’t know why you’re being deliberately and aggressively obtuse or why my personal preference for male leadership unhinges you so.
Nowhere did I say, “women are not capable of being leaders.” NOWHERE.
I said I PREFER strong, male leadership. That is my preference, and YES it IS Biblical, whether you like it, or not.
Trump’s donations are not all Democrat. He has given to both parties, although more to Democrats than Republicans. http://www.newsmeat.com/billionaire_political_donations/Donald_Trump.php
Why is it that you only want a male leader?
This is your quote:
“Because men are meant to be, designed to be, the leaders”.
There it is.
So by men, do you mean OBAMA? He’s a “man”. Or how about Mitt Romney, or Huckabee? Those are real “strong” men aren’t they? Seems to me the only leaders today are the women, Palin, Bachmann,even Clinton, so there goes your theory. How about Boehner, the crier, yeah he’s strong too.
Fruit loops, it seems to me that you’re the one who’s unhinged, just because I happen to disagree with you and didn’t kiss your butt for your long winded original post you are being the obtuse and aggressive one, and good for you for referencing the bible.
By the way, does that mean if Palin is the nominee, you’ll sit this one out? LOL! :)
I cant fault Trump for this. The rat media demagogued the case beyond recognition. Almost no one has an appreciation of the facts as a result.
Well I’ve always had a love hate relationship with The Donald. He can be a pompous azzhat and he has an ego the size of Manhattan but then he will sit down in an interview and come up with some really truthful and intelligent thinking. He’s right about OPEC. We should be selling them $100 per bushel wheat.
I’m sure Trump does give a lot of money to Dem campaigns. He is in NY and he has to do business. He probably does pay off the unions to get deals done. What else is new? I do think the guy loves America and what it stands for.
So whatever his reason Trump is definitely doing the country a favor by pushing this eligibility issue which nobody else has the panache to do. Maybe Trump has no real intention of actually running. Maybe he is just trying to eff up Barry Soetoro so the GOP will win. Or maybe he is just ticked off that the Obamao Administration never even had the class to acknowledge Trump’s generous offer to build a $20mil-$30 mil grand ballroom addition onto the Whitehouse as a gift to the country.
What the hell is your problem?!
You apparently missed some of my last comments, and you apparently did not even read my column, since you mentioned Huckabee and Romney.
Yes, men are the natural leaders, but not all men are good leaders. This does NOT MEAN WOMEN CAN’T BE LEADERS.
My preference for strong, male leadership does NOT INCLUDE EVIL MALE LEADERSHIP.
I also never said I would not vote for a woman if that’s the only choice there was.
Now, why don’t you move along and find something constructive to do with your time?
Just one comment on Trump and Obamacare. He is for repeal:
Donald Trump: ObamaCare Is Unconstitutional, Should Be RepealedThis is from the CNS news service.
BTW, have you read the extensive interview Trump did recently with Human Events magazine? I know that Trump is all over the place with his views, but he has moved to the right on many issues. Now, I'm not going to just jump on the bandwagon because Trump is making conservative noises; but I'm not going to reject him on the basis of ten-year old opinions either.
Here is a link to Human Events interview: Can Donald Trump Save America?
As I said, I won't jump on any bandwagons until I hear more. I totally agree with you that we have a field of weak horses. I need hear more about Trump's views on judicial appointments, for one thing. Nevertheless, doesn't he provide pretty strong "male leadership"? That quality doesn't seal the deal, but it's a positive, yes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.