FINAL REPORT: Obama's Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate "Natural Born" Status

The Daily Pen ^ | April 2, 2011 | Penbrook Johannson

[Creme Brulee]

A new investigation of Obama’s birth announcements appearing in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified “Live" birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined "vital event" by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.

[cycle of discernment]

Hesch agreed that there is probably information in the original medical birth record which undermines Obama’s identity as a politician and that is the reason why Obama is refusing to disclose it.

“Oh, sure, he is hiding something,” he said, “that is a fact and that is the only reason NOT to disclose it. Because, if the original medical record supported his current identity, he would be stupid to keep it hidden. It would only support him in that case.”

When asked his opinion about Obama’s case, Hesch said that is a certainty in his mind that Obama’s birth documentation was subjected to administrative processes or amendments and that his medically verified natal records show information that the local vital records authority is able to protect under law under the guise of identity protection.

“Of course, it’s ridiculous,” said Hesch, “the Secret Service is not required here. This is natal information which occurred 50 years ago, not a public appearance where the president is under any threat. The only reason to hide the original record is to protect something Obama doesn’t want people to know about him and how that information adversely impacts his ability to be president. It’s plain and simple to me.”

[immadashell]

I guess the realists will just keep working to vote him gone instead of relying on document magic to dissolve him.

And then all future lists of Presidents of the United States should show an asterisk after his name.

[Red Steel]

Well, thank goodness that’s settled.

No. Not so for Obama.

“The birth announcements were printed from unconfirmed information provided to the Newspapers by the Department of Health without the DOH or newspaper editors confirming the actual location of the birth with any hospital in Hawaii,” says Crosby in a phone call from Oahu, “I found thousands of birth registration records of children born outside of Hawaii who have their announcements published in these two newspapers by cross referencing the announcements with the U.S. Department of Health Vital Records Report for Hawaii.”

We see that you can call the Hawaiian newspapers about a birth halfway around the world and they will print about it.

[cycle of discernment]

comments:
cfkerchner said...
Very good report. This confirms what I had deduced using tools from years of being a hobby genealogist when I filed my lawsuit against Obama & Congress in January 2009. Here is my recitation of that deduced narrative to explain Obama’s fraudulent nativity story and the two newspaper birth announcement to Bill Cunningham on his radio show in August 2009 broadcast out of Cincinnati OH.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ

Again excellent field work in Hawaii and if anyone doubts that Obama was only falsely registered (probably by Grandma Dunham) as physically born in Hawaii and not actually born there (which it is very obvious to anyone investigating all the reports about Obama that he was not really born there) your report puts the last nail in the Obot’s spin and talking points coffin.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/50610336/Obama-Ineligible-14-Mar-2011-Washington-Times-National-Weekly-edition-pg-5

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org

April 2, 2011 8:57 AM
Puzo1 said...
Excellent field work which confirms our suspicions regarding Obama being born in Hawaii. For other evidence which supports this suspicion, see my essay entitled, A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Born in Hawaii, at
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
http://puzo1.blogspot.com

April 2, 2011 11:34 AM

[ladyjane]

It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots.

Excellent reason to ignore the Constitution. Not.

[GlockThe Vote]

Bfl.

[Doogle]

..how much more info exposing this scumbag is needed?

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2490825

[fish hawk]

O’Reilly has been told this over and over and yet still thinks that paper ad is conclusive evidence that Obama is legal. I've told him that, how would he like to see that same Honolulu paper with his birth notice right under Obama’s. The point being , when it comes to printed papers and documents they can be altered in many ways.

[humblegunner]

We see that you can call the Hawaiian newspapers about a birth halfway around the world and they will print about it.

Surely.

And that removes Obama HOW exactly?

[shield]

How much more evidence do we need. It actually doesn’t matter if he was born in HI. He claims his father is BHO Sr. who was a foreign student on a foreign student visa...who cares if we have a BC or not...he is not QUALIFIED to be a president of the USA.

[fish hawk]

I get a kick out of people like you. Even if it shows him illegal and nothing happens about it, don't you want to know the truth? The truth being that he lied to you all along. I'm a “birther” but I don't expect anything out of this until way after Obama is out of office and maybe never. Still I want to know the truth.

[Lazlo in PA]

"Hey. You Birthers are dopes. We looked in to all of this on the Factor. We didn't find a BC but Obama was born here. You can trust me. I'm looking out for the folk for f$%k sake."

[American Constitutionalist]

" Did anyone notice the announcements are not in any alphabetic order, or in order of birthdate? This is because, in 1961, birth registration numbers were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers, the DOH does. It appears that Obama’s birth was registered in an office not used by any of the birth registrations offices who received birth certification from either Kapi-olani Medical Center, or Queens Medical Center which use two local offices near those facilities,” said Crosby. "

Rut Roh Saggy , that means ? and proves that Obama was not born at any hospital in Hawaii.

Notice ? he says ? " in 1961, birth registration numbers were issued based on the location of the local Vital Records office in which the registration was recorded. The hospital does not assign these numbers, the DOH does "

The registration numbers are not issued by the hospitals, they are issued by the Department of Health in Hawaii.

So that means ? someone filled out a birth registration at the DOH in Hawaii.

If Obama was not born in any hospitals in Hawaii ? where then ? did either his mother, grandmother, or someone else get the information for those registration numbers ?
Could it be very well ? that the Kenyan birth certificate registration numbers that Lucus Smith posted be the same numbers what Obama's grandmother or someone else called into Hawaii from Kenya ?

[Red Steel]

And that removes Obama HOW exactly?

It means that the propaganda put out by the OBots is false. That getting a Hawaiian newspaper to write a blurb about a birth didn't have to be from an Hawaiian hospital.

[humblegunner]

The truth being that he lied to you all along.

Some of us are not surprised by that fact.

Point is that the best thing to be done about it is to vote him out.

[BluH2o]

This article is excellent ... assuming naysayers in the liberal MSM, not to mention several so called conservative commenter types, will read this ... it will certainly give them pause for thought. The evidence against Obama being qualified to be POTUS is mounting ... quality information of this kind is damning ... no question.

[Politicalmom]

I am interested because I NEVER want this to happen again.

[Creme Brulee]

Well, thank goodness that’s settled. So, this’ll have him ousted tomorrow? No? More ineffectual fluff & puffery? I guess the realists will just keep working to vote him gone instead of relying on document magic to dissolve him.

Did you even bother reading the article, before posting that comment? Of course not. Because, had you read it, you would have seen no suggestion that this information could be used to remove him. It simply explained how birth announcements came to appear in Hawaiian newspapers. In other words, it addressed the bogus claim that somehow these announcements are enough to prove he was born in Hawaii.

[combat_boots]

“It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots.

Excellent reason to ignore the Constitution. Not.”

You know, if people are willing to kill you off politically, there isn’t a whole lot of difference. Your ability to function, travel freely, work, afford anything...is directly affected. If Blacks and others are willing to go physical and kill others once learning the Truth, what would they do for a lie? Tear up LA? And this says exactly what about them and their living in the US?

[txhurl]

No, the best thing to be done is to deny him ballot on enough states that he doesn’t bother running in 12.

Which IS voting him out, in a pre-emptive way. Skipping all the commercials, too.