Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark R. Levin: Dual Citizenship is Citizenship by Statute, Not 14th Amendment Citizenship
ConstitutionallySpeaking ^ | April 7, 2010 | Linda Melin

Posted on 04/07/2011 12:46:23 PM PDT by patlin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: K-Stater

“Knock yourself out. “

From the conversation so far, I think it might be the equivalence of casting pearls before swine. I’m beginning to think that talking to you is like teaching a pig to dance. I’m wasting a lot of time, and I’m annoying the pig.

I might do it later for amusement. Right now I have to go Responsibilitys call.


121 posted on 04/08/2011 5:32:26 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Exactly. And until there is such a law passed, no one can be in violation of the law.

Wrong. The law needs to be clarified. There doesn't need to be any new law as it already exists in Article II of the law of the land.

122 posted on 04/08/2011 5:58:42 PM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

gotcha


123 posted on 04/08/2011 7:04:44 PM PDT by patlin (Reagan was a Democrat before he was a Republican: "I didn't leave the Democrat Party, they left me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I’m wasting a lot of time, and I’m annoying the pig.

There is nothing really that you need be annoyed over.

124 posted on 04/10/2011 10:34:05 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
English Law would have maintained the Nobility and the official Clergy.

As would Vattel. Or haven't you read the book?

Read the Federalist papers. This issue is discussed in there as well. I would excerpt them for you, but I’m suspecting it would be a waste of my time. Not yours, of course. You might actually get some knowledge on you.

Knowledge? Not from your posts it appears.

125 posted on 04/10/2011 10:36:55 AM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater

I think you are a Liberal partisan attempting to misdirect. You might even be part of a paid team. You obviously know too much about the information being discussed to get it so completely wrong by accident.

No one is that stupid. Therefore you are an agent of the enemy. That’s what I think.


126 posted on 04/10/2011 2:22:32 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I think you are a Liberal partisan attempting to misdirect

If everyone on this forum who disagrees with you is a liberal partisan attempting to misdirect then the liberals outnumber the conservatives by a large margin.

No one is that stupid.

Oh I don't know about that.

127 posted on 04/10/2011 2:25:19 PM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater

I am not playing this game with you anymore. You are obviously intelligent enough to comprehend what has been put in front of you. The fact that you WILL NOT means that you are not amendable to facts or reason.

I happen to know that there are Liberal partisans all over this issue on lots of different blogs, and I think You are one of those. You are just a source of noise trying to prevent others from hearing the truth.

Obama is NOT eligible under Article II because he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen. Indeed, at this point we don’t even know if he’s an American citizen of any sort. He is a lying con man that has done great damage to the nation, and hopefully those people who have enabled and protected him will eventually feel the wrath and vengeance of the American people whom they have betrayed.


128 posted on 04/10/2011 2:33:43 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater

Of course you don’t know about that. The first rule of fooldom is to be unaware of the condition.


129 posted on 04/10/2011 2:36:33 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
The first rule of fooldom is to be unaware of the condition.

I'll defer to your expertise in the rules of fooldom.

130 posted on 04/10/2011 2:40:21 PM PDT by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: K-Stater

“I’ll defer to your expertise in the rules of fooldom.”

Your pathetic counter-riposte invokes the FALLACY OF AUTHORITY! Ha ha ha ha...

Here. Get an education then come back when you are better prepared. :)

http://www.constitution.org/col/logical_fallacies.htm

Don’t they teach this stuff in LIEberal land?

Actually I shouldn’t even show you that. It might give you some ideas for fallacies you haven’t tried yet. Ah well, at least I can amuse myself watching you flop about. :)


131 posted on 04/10/2011 5:08:12 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson