Posted on 04/19/2011 5:38:49 AM PDT by Alaphiah123
Generally, one wouldnt attempt to support ones argument or disprove a falsehood by introducing fraudulent information into the discussion. Yet that is exactly what John King did in his interview regarding Arizonas newly passed bill requiring presidential candidates to prove that they meet the constitutional requirement of Natural born citizenship. The bill sent to governor Jan Brewer's desk was vetoed by Brewer.
John Kings guess was Attorney at Law Orly Taitz a favorite of the Left to disparage as a "birther." What is interesting is in the exchange King makes no attempt at journalistic objectivity he is clearly there to defend Barry Hussein Soetoro.
One would think that a crack news agency like CNN wouldnt use invalid documentation in attempt to prove that there is proof of the presidents eligibility.
(Excerpt) Read more at creatingorwellianworld-view-alaphiah.blogspot.com ...
John Kings guess was Attorney at Law Orly Taitz a favorite of the Left to disparage as a "birther."
Well, if it's all written like that I can see why you might wish to hide it.
Thank you. Took the words right off of my keyboard.
There is a related video at the blog.
I’ll place it here so folks won’t have to visit the blog:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10-4a5T10HM&feature=player_embedded
Taitz's argument: "Look at these documents, look at these statutes, think about these quotes, look at these court decisions, read the Constitution."
John King's rebuttal: "You're crazy!"
Black guy's rebuttal: "You're racist!"
They had talking points when it came to the BC but they had absolutely no idea what to do with the SS claim. I don’t know much about the SS idea but I would like to hear more about it. That was quite entertaining. Incidentally their talking points on the BC were clearly BS. A newspaper article is evidence of exactly nothing. I would like to see someone make a claim that a foreigner is a US citizen in Hawaii and publish that because I believe that it’s probably very easily done
CNN => Communist News Network
So, tell us Al. What was your first language?
Another claim by King was patently false.
The so-called birth announcements don’t list the address of an apartment where the grandparents were living. It lists a residence which the Obama’s never resided together.
You see how they reacted to the charge of Obama using a stolen SSN.
The look on the black guys face was one that said, “What, where did you get that?!?!”
“I’m cutting this interview so we can get some SS talking points” — John King
As evidenced by the blink stares on their faces when Taitz brought up the SS issue
This is classic Obama defense Others who defend Obama on this site use the “Why not post it here” tact to block conversation
Absolutely!
Diogenesis an excellence current event montage of MSM protection of the unconstitutional presidency which they help create.
Block conversation?
We are trying to bring the content to Free Republic to spur the conversation and share the information.
Your excerpts are the only attempt to block what appears of Free Republic.
Why do you not want your message to reach more people?
Have a snacker
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.