Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Representative Ron Paul: Obama's Constitutional Eligibility To Be President Is Irrelevant
Birther Report ^ | April 21, 2011 | Birther Report

Posted on 04/22/2011 12:26:07 PM PDT by RobinMasters

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
If you want to see this movie, download it here :

A Question of Eligibility

PDF Report : Obama Eligibility Primer (32 pages)

Download the PDF Report here

Sign the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Petition

The Jerome Corsi's forthcoming book “Where's the Birth Certificate ?" : WheresTheBirthCertificate.com

1 posted on 04/22/2011 12:26:08 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.


2 posted on 04/22/2011 12:29:16 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I'm not ready for the old folks home yet.

3 posted on 04/22/2011 12:30:30 PM PDT by McGruff (When it comes to Obama's birth certificate. Trust, but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

If its irrelevant, then show the documents and move on.


4 posted on 04/22/2011 12:32:55 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (BHO II naturalized as U.S. Citizen after becoming an Indonesian National)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

The man is, overall, an embarrassment at best.


5 posted on 04/22/2011 12:34:04 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I cant wait to see what the Ron Paul supporters have to say about this.


6 posted on 04/22/2011 12:34:38 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crz

Ron Paul could say farting is unConstitutional and they would agree with him.


7 posted on 04/22/2011 12:35:40 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Hey Paul! If you consider one part of the Constitution irrelevant, then you must consider all of it irrelevant. You can’t ignore one portion of the Constitution to suit your position while enforcing the rest. It’s an either or proposition.


8 posted on 04/22/2011 12:37:43 PM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

My first thought also but seeing how they support this idiot, I can imagine their responses a bit tho.


9 posted on 04/22/2011 12:41:30 PM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Always suspected that the Constitution was irrelevant to the Paulestinians.


10 posted on 04/22/2011 12:47:03 PM PDT by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

He may as well resign his office. If he doesn’t know the answers and has no desire to get them then he isn’t worth a plug nickel.


11 posted on 04/22/2011 12:47:45 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

I just tore up my campaign for liberty donation check.


12 posted on 04/22/2011 12:49:01 PM PDT by naturalborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Defend Liberty

I must say I am a little surprised. Mr. Paul is treating the Constitution just like Obummer...or a Chinese food takeout menu.


13 posted on 04/22/2011 12:52:34 PM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (DeMint/Ryan 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.

THAT is one of the most BRUTAL comments I've ever seen on Free Republic.

And I like it.

Because it's true.

Ron Paul the "constitutionalist": The Constitution is irrelevant.

I've often wondered if he's reading some sort of strange redacted version of the document.

14 posted on 04/22/2011 12:54:15 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (What part of NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE do you fail to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: naturalborn
I just tore up my campaign for liberty donation check.

Now that's brutal too.

Hittin' 'em where it really hurts.

15 posted on 04/22/2011 12:55:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (What part of NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE do you fail to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Exactlly


16 posted on 04/22/2011 12:57:30 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

He should call in to Mark Levin. Would Levin interview him or give him the 20 second clock?


17 posted on 04/22/2011 12:57:50 PM PDT by zippythepinhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zippythepinhead

“Would Levin interview him or give him the 20 second clock?”

Ron Paul would sound like “Crazy Jim from Brooklyn” if given the 20 second clock.


18 posted on 04/22/2011 1:00:39 PM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (DeMint/Ryan 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Brutal and I like it too. Well said.


19 posted on 04/22/2011 1:00:43 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

It comes from the same flaw liberals have in how they read it. They start out with their beliefs in mind, then read into it what they want to make it work. Almost every piece of legislation the most lib congressman writes, he can give you what he thinks is a Constitutional justification for it, and it is usually an illogical twist.

For the Paultards, they don’t use the Constitution or even the underlying belief in individual freedom as the foundation. They instead, start with what RuPaul says about it and make it fit his world view.


20 posted on 04/22/2011 1:06:29 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson