Skip to comments.Obama’s Green Energy Plants Create “Toxic Brew Of Pollutants”
Posted on 04/27/2011 2:36:55 PM PDT by Nachum
A few days after the Obama Administration proudly announced its latest multi million-dollar infusion for green energy plants, a news report reveals that the government-backed projects actually infest the air with a toxic brew of pollutants.
To support the presidents aggressive push for renewable technology, the administration has steered hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to dubious projects that claim to create energy thats environmentally friendly. Instead, the new power plants are polluting the earth with nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, ammonia and particulate matter. They also release thick plumes and visible dust and fail to monitor equipment or file emissions reports.
Details of how Obamas precious green power plants are actually destroying the climate are featured in an in-depth story published this week by an investigative journalism group. Known as biomass power plants, the facilities are promoted as innovative and environmentally-friendly generators of electricity that are popping up nationwide thanks to Uncle Sams generous contributions.
Many powerful lawmakers, mostly Democrats, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have put their weight behind the biomass plants, which burn trees, construction debris, poultry litter and agricultural mass to create alternative energy. However, concerns about health hazards have created alarms in communities where the plants operate.
Not to worry because the politically-connected and government-backed biomass industry has managed to delay for three years a study into claims that pollution from their factories contaminates the air and harms health. There have even been reports that the variety of pollutants contribute to asthma and heart disease.
In the meantime, the government keeps pouring big bucks into the biomass power industry. Earlier this month the USDA and the Department of Energy allocated $30 million to a Biomass Research and Development Initiative that promises to help advance biofuels, bioenergy and high-value biobased products. This is simply part of Obamas goal to ensure a cleaner, safer and more secure energy future, according to his Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
Obamas Energy Secretary (Steven Chu) asserts that the biomass projects will reduce Americas dependence on imported oil, which in turn, will improve the nations energy security and give it an innovative edge in the global market for clean energy technologies. How can you argue with that?
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
I don’t have a problem with ‘bio-mass’ plants (or Methane generators).
What I do have a problem with is the government giving people my money to run them.
Like everything else. If it can’t make it on it’s own, then it’s not viable.
I should correct myself.
It’s not ‘Methane generators’, but Methane POWERED generators.
Bit of a difference. :0)
Let’s see now. Seems to me the Libs were the first back in the 1950’s, and ‘60’s to legislate the removal of incinerators for home use, and did away with burning of trash that was the cause then of the later Liberal bitch about overflowing landfills.
NOW it’s OK to burn up all that crap, and pollute the air, because they say so!? Where’s the science on any of it?
I asked in a previous post where was the science on any of it?, and of course that was rhetorical, because the Leftist environmentalists are busy establishing precedence to take the place of the science that either doesn't exist, or is as phony as the environmentalists.
Bump! Great work, FRiend. Wish I had more of me to track you all these past months [and in future months].
ON the list, and thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.